|
|
PIG
NEWS DIGEST
| COMMENTARY
|
JANUARY 2012
|
America Hangs in the Balance.
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts
This is a very dangerous time in American history. Everywhere we turn the enemies of our freedom are marshaling their forces, getting ready for that final assault that will suffocate our liberty.
I'd like to tell you that this assault is being mounted by enemies from far away places, but I can't. America faces those threats too, but the enemy who is poised to condemn us to unrelenting tyranny is already here, lurking among us.
We nurtured this enemy in government schools that replaced education with indoctrination.
We empowered this enemy in colleges and universities where their hatred of American liberty reached critical mass.
We allow the enemy in our midst to twist reality beyond recognition from their positions in the mass media.
We allow the enemy in our midst to undercut our liberty bit by bit, from their positions inside our government.
We cut our own throats by letting them buy us off with their wealth transfer payments disguised as tax rebates, and assorted other tax-funded bribes.
The enemy in our midst is that mouthy, neo-Socialist rat bastard who we refuse to face down with some well chosen words and badly needed reality checks.
How the hell did we get here? How indeed.
Your inalienable individual liberty is a birthright, not a gift from a benevolent government. When it comes to your rights, the State has two options. If the State takes the high, lightly traveled, road it will respect and defend your liberty by establishing a political environment that maximizes each individual's rights. If the State takes the low, well traveled, road it will heed the Siren song of the clamoring, tyrannical mob by infringing, violating, minimizing and repealing your rights.
This low road rights infringement rarely happens in one, tyrannical revocation. Normally, your rights are eroded away over a long period of time, trimming a little off this right, pretending that one never existed, and redefining another, until you wake up one day as a slave of the all-powerful State. We're not watching our rights being swallowed a chunk at a time. We're allowing the State to decimate our liberty through a thousand little bureaucratic bites. It's a lot like losing your hair. You don't notice those strands slipping away a few at a time, until one day you wake up a cue ball.
This nibbling is evident from sea to shining sea, if you know where to look. If you're a business owner, the Nanny State makes you pay for the 'privilege' of letting some job for life bureaucrat micro-manage your company. You're told how much you need to pay via minimum wage laws. If you look cross-eyed at the properly-hyphenated you're destined for EEOC hell for job discrimination. If you have the insane idea that you have the inherent right - for good or ill - to determine what benefits you'll provide, decide who will be hired or fired, and determine who will be allowed to avail themselves of your goods and services, you're headed for a rude Nanny State awakening.
If you're a media purveyor who thinks he, she, heshe, or it should be allowed to present entertainment that will please an adult audience, you're destined to do a header into the FCC's decency dimwits. If you're an adult who wants entertainment meant for adults, not some dipstick's unsupervised 3 year old, you're doomed to bitter disappointment thanks to the bureaucrats who dance to the tune played by Brent Bozell and Donald Wildmon. Puritanical pinhead paranoia trumps your inalienable liberty.
If you're a politically aware individual who thinks you should be allowed to put as much of your own money as you want behind the candidate of your choice, get over it. If you want to take out ads to expose the shortcomings of your elected tormentor during the waning days of the campaign, get over it. The Incumbents are protected by The Guaranteed Re-Election Act - A.K.A. campaign finance reform. That's right, politically active Sparky, your elected tormentors have criminalized your no longer "free" political speech.
Like the Nanny State pinheads, rational adults have two viable options. We can allow these political punks to keep nibbling away at our inalienable individual liberty. Or, we can stand up, swat them aside and tell them to knock it the hell off, right goddamn now. You can do what you want, but this sovereign individual is more than ready to bitch-slap some liberty-nibbling pinheads. Enough already!
A Memorably PIGish Moment
Source: Hambo's Hammer [01/12/12]
After viewing the images of the Marines taking a whiz on the corpses of some room temperature Taliban, I still don't understand the fuss. Maybe it's a flaw in my character.
Trying to understand, I looked at a couple factors.
First, I look at the so-called 'victims'. It's nearly impossible to get choked up over anything done to THEM. We're talking about the Taliban, some serious assholes whose idea of 'fun' is throwing acid in the faces of Afghan wenchlets whose only crime is going to school. We're talking about the Taliban, allegedly human turds who are the most barbaric rat bastards on Earth.
Next, I look at who has their panties in a wad over them. The first out of the box was CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations). They are outraged...hardly a shock. Comrade Shrillary has her knickers in a knot over it and is huffing and puffing as only she can. Last, but far from least, there are the Moonbats in the MSM who are ramping up for an Abu Ghraib class scandal which will give them an excuse to vilify the United States Marines.
Finally, the incident has been called "inhumane", "indefensible", and "reprehensible", plus much, much, more, by the usual suspects. They are entitled to their opinion, even when it's dead wrong. Given the infamous, inhuman, actions perpetrated by the Taliban, the scumbags no shit deserve ANYTHING that is done to them. Reaping what they sow? You better believe it, Sparky.
Some critics say that OUR warriors should take the high road. Some critics insist that OUR warriors must be held to a higher standard. BULLSHIT. We're fighting a brutal, sadistic, enemy who make the Marquis de Sade look like Mother Theresa. That, in my opinion, disqualifies them for 'the high road', and 'a higher standard'.
I say it's time to hit them where it hurts. How? Their weakness is their unwavering adherence to OLD SCHOOL Islam. It's about time we use that belief against them. As far as I'm concerned, pissing on their corpse is a suitable beginning. Why? This quote from a friend says it all: "The least we can do is send them on their way to their 72 virgins reeking of hot American piss." Truer words, PIGsters. Truer words.
As far as the Taliban are concerned, I say PISS ON THEM!
Distinctions
Source: Hambo's Hammer [01/10/12]
If you listen to VRWC talk radio, you've hear some caller ask the host to delineate the differences between Demoncrats and Republicans. The first thing that comes to mind is a quote I heard in passing. When asked about the need for a third party, the celebrity (I apologize for not scribbling down his name) said "We don't need a 'third' party. What we need is a second one." Truer words, PIGsters. Truer words.
After giving the party particulars some thought, I found more similarities than differences:
Taxes:
Political hacks from both parties have show a demented zeal for using this nation's punitive taxes, fees and assessments to perpetrate social engineering on the American populace.
Border Jumpers:
Political hacks from both parties seem poised to legalize the 12 to 20 million border jumpers who infest our nation. Some talk tough, but when you shovel aside the rhetoric, it's just hot air covering up their unwillingness to boot these invaders out of our country.
Jihadikazes:
Nobody seems willing to man up and face the facts that - like it or not - Islam is the enemy that we're fighting. Neither party confront the inconvenient truth that Islam is a flavor of supernaturalism that preaches world conquest.
Nanny State Growth:
Both operate under the conviction that 'bigger is always better', but each feels compelled to add, "it works best when we're in charge".
What's the difference between Americas two political clans?
One is backward-looking, is plodding toward a cradle to grave Nanny State, and believes you need to be saved from your sinful impulses by the coercive power of the Nanny State. Its patron saints are Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater. Its symbol is the elephant, a plodding creature with a long memory.
The other is sprinting toward a cradle to grave Nanny State and is convinced that you're too stupid to run your own life so you must be saved from your intellectual shortcomings by the coercive power of the Nanny State. Its patron saints are John F. Kennedy and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Its symbol is the jackass (ok, I know it's a donkey, but 'the jackass party' rocks my world), a creature that is almost as annoying as the members of this party.
What's the difference between the Demoncrats and the Republicraps? One group of statusts puts a 'D.' after their names, the other group of statists puts 'R' after their names.
Pagan Scribbler Wisdom
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts
Item: A Presidential Restore Point
What America really needs is the functional equivalent of the Microsoft Windows 'Restore Point' for the Presidency. When a dangerous political virus - Marxism, for example - invades the Oval Office in the form of a Dumbo-eared Moonbat, we could immediately, 'restore' the presidency to an earlier, more stable, condition, one where rational adults inhabited the White House.
I know what you're thinking and you're right, more or less. YES...Technically, we already have something similar, a presidential election every four years. That's all well and good, but it has a dark underbelly: the Oval Office invading virus gets to eat away at our liberty for 4 years, before we can eject him, her, himher, or it.
Inalienable individual liberty can be a serious BITCH about shit like this.
Item: Rick Santorum's priorities
According to a news report, Rick Santorum is crisscrossing Iowa on his "Faith, Family & Freedom" tour. I don't have any PIG-worthy issues with the concepts underscored by his three keywords: FAITH, FAMILY, FREEDOM. I do, however, feel compelled to ask if they are listed in the proper order.
Are the three words listed in alphabetical order, deliberately? Perhaps, but given Rick Santorum's beliefs, I suspect he listed them in the order of their importance, to him. I get that, but, the quasi rational adult in me won't let it slide.
Rick, dude, you're not running for PASTOR of the United States. You're not running for FAMILY COUNSELOR of the United States. You're running for PRESIDENT of the United States. Your focus is/ought to be the POLITICAL realm.
In the POLITICAL realm, FREEDOM must come first. Why? Because without FREEDOM, you can't exercise your FAITH. Without FREEDOM, your FAMILY will be born, live, and die as slaves to an all-powerful state. FREEDOM is the foundation upon which everything else in your life is built. Life, like houses, must begin with a solid foundation. If you don't get that right, everything else falls apart.
If Rick's number one, overriding, concern is FAITH, then why bother with FREEDOM at all? Why even bother running for POTUS, a job that is supposed to maximize the individual liberty (FREEDOM) of each American? A President's job is to establish a solid foundation of individual liberty so each American has the FREEDOM to practice his, her, hisher, or its FAITH. A President's job is to establish a solid foundation of individual liberty so each American can raise a new generation of sovereign individuals...AKA raise their own family.
I think Rick should know this stuff, and maybe he does. Maybe politics dictates that you open with the FAITH card. So be it.
Parting shot: Much ado about nothing? Perhaps, but, like so many things in life, the Devil is in the details. |
DECEMBER 2011
|
Signs & Portents
Source: Hambo's Hammer [12/30/11]
* The News Nitwits are taking a walk down the 2011 block of Memory Lane. Like the two blocks which precede it, the 2011 block visited by the News Nitwits, has thousands of shrines venerating a Dumbo-eared Moonbat. If you look closely, you'll notice that all the graffiti reads "It's all Bush's (Bush 43) fault."
* Smugly sanctimonious talking heads preach their annual sermon about the too, too, real dangers of drinking and driving. But, in the next breath, they spout so much depressing, demented, drivel, that you're compelled to reach for that handy dandy Jack Daniels bottle.
* The cable pitstop with the asinine new name, The SyFy Channel, delighted my lovely bride by reanimating their venerable Twilight Zone Marathon.
* In Hollywood (Mexifornia), person, or persons, unknown, decided to dabble in Urban Renewal. For the third night in a row, an unknown firebug torched cars parked in the carports next to apartment complexes.
* Underscoring the epic decline in American culture, a Las Vegas watering hole shelled out a reported $600,000 to Pornstar Karda$hian to parade her fat ass around at their party, on Saturday, December 31, 2011.
* In Mexifornia, sovereign individuals will exercise their liberty, while they still can, by strapping an unloaded firearm to their hip then chowing down on a bowl of Shark's Fin Soup. Tomorrow, both activities join such things as governmental fiscal discipline, and a veneration for American sovereignty on the banned in Mexifornia scrapheap.
*The One has flown off to the cuckoo's nest (Hawaii), where he's living LARGE, on our dime.
Yup, all the signs and portents point the same thing: we've reached the magic moment in the year, when it's, once again, time to press the reset button on our calendar. We'll, once again, shake off the excess baggage left over from 2011. We'll try our utmost to start off 2012 with the sincere, albeit misguided, conviction that the worst is behind us. We'll convince ourselves that 2012 offers us smoother ride through the twists and turns ahead of us.
Of course, by dinnertime on New Year's Day, our hangover will be gone and we'll once again face the thrills, chills, and spills of objective reality,with clear minds, and unclouded eyes.
Parting shot: Can 2012 be better than 2011? You bet, but it's not going to just fall into our lap. Like anything else worth having, we'll need to work at it.
Guest Commentary
Source: Net Right Daily [12/16/11]
[ALG (Americans for Limited Government) president Bill Wilson, sounds an ominous warning on the bill that would exterminate freedom of speech in cyberspace.]
Internet piracy bill: A free speech 'kill switch'
By Bill Wilson — What began as an attempt to restrain foreign piracy on the Internet has morphed into a domestic "kill switch" on First Amendment freedom in the fastest-growing corner of the marketplace of ideas.
Proposed federal legislation purporting to protect online intellectual property would also impose sweeping new government mandates on internet service providers — a positively Orwellian power grab that would permit the U.S. Justice Department to shut down any internet site it doesn't like (and cut off its sources of income) on nothing more than a whim.
Under the so-called "Stop Online Piracy Act" (SOPA) the federal government — which is prohibited constitutionally from abridging free speech or depriving its citizens of their property without due process — would engage in both practices on an unprecedented scale. And in establishing the precursor to a taxpayer-funded "thought police," it would dramatically curtail technology investment and innovation – wreaking havoc on our economy.
Consider this: Under the proposed legislation all that's required for government to shutdown a specific website is the mere accusation that the site unlawfully featured copyrighted content. Such an accusation need not be proven — or even accompanied by probable cause. All that an accuser (or competitor) needs to do in order to obtain injunctive relief is point the finger at a website.
Additionally, SOPA would grant regulators the ability to choke off revenue to the owners of these newly classified "rogue" websites by accusing their online advertisers and payment providers as co-conspirators in the alleged "piracy." Again, no finding of fact would be required — the mere allegation of impropriety is all that's needed to cut the website's purse strings.
Who's vulnerable to this legislation?
"Any website that features user-generated content or that enables cloud-based data storage could end up in its crosshairs," writes David Sohn, senior policy council at the Center on Democracy and Technology. "(Internet Service Providers) would face new and open-ended obligations to monitor and police user behavior. Payment processors and ad networks would be required to cut off business with any website that rights-holders allege hasn't done enough to police infringement."
The Center's president and CEO, Leslie Harris, points a bleak picture of the impact SOPA and its companion legislation in the U.S. Senate would have on the world wide web, arguing that the legislation would "(jeopardize) the continued development of powerful new forums for free expression and political dissent."
"If these bills pass, there will be major collateral damage to Internet innovation, online free expression, the inner workings of Internet security, and user privacy," Harris writes.
Google's public policy director Bob Boorstin takes it one step further, arguing that the bills "would put the U.S. government in the very position we criticize repressive regimes for doing — all in the name of copyright."
The proliferation of free expression on the Internet has spawned a vibrant new marketplace of ideas — toppling the old legacy media construct and ushering in an era of enhanced accountability in which thousands of new voices provide heightened scrutiny of our elected officials.
Obviously, silencing those voices and stifling the web's innovative potential would exact a heavy toll on this new accountability — and on the U.S. economy. In a letter urging their colleagues to oppose SOPA, U.S. Reps. Zoe Lofgren and Darrell Issa speak to this very concern.
"Online innovation and commerce were responsible for 15 percent of U.S. GDP growth from 2004 to 2009," Reps. Lofgren and Issa write. "Before we impose a sprawling new regulatory regime on the Internet, we must carefully consider the risks that it could pose for this vital engine of our economy."
Safeguarding intellectual property is certainly an important goal. The ability to protect one's work product is vital to the proper functioning of the free market — and key to preserving its innovative potential. However in enhancing property protections, we cannot permit the government to trample over our right to free speech and due process.
SOPA is the equivalent of curing a headache with a guillotine. It may stop piracy, but it would shut down our economy and unconstitutionally erode our most basic freedoms in the process.
Bill Wilson is president of Americans for Limited Government. You can follow Bill on Twitter at @BillWilsonALG.
What I'd Really Like For Christmas
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts
What do you get for a pagan scribbler who - whopper alert - has everything? What would put the HO, HO, HO back in Hambo's Christmas? On advice from my legal eagle, Iggy Kowalski - yes I mean the same Iggy who has me on a first name basis with every IRS auditor from sea to shining sea - I'm not going THERE.
I am allowed to tell you that I'd be thrilled spitless to get one, or more, of the following items in the stocking that's hung by the chimney with care:
* A sanity saving Christmas season during which nobody mentions The One's name, nobody broadcasts his voice, and nobody poops out his image.
* A YouTube video showing Senator Harry "Crypt Keeper" Reid being tarred and feathered by outraged rational Nevada adults.
* A newscast that, for a change, does NOT piss me off so majorly, that my neighbors implore the cops to send in a SWAT Team.
* A front page National Enquirer story about Barney Frank being caught in his chaps, uh, taking it like a man from terminally horny, blind as a bat, moose with very low standards.
* A TMZ item which blabs the thrilling news that the Kardashian bitches Mom, Sasquatch, Porn Star and Kourtney have been abducted by E.T.
* A POTUS who spends all of his waking hours PRESERVING, PROTECTING, and DEFENDING the Constitution of the United States, instead of trying to flush it, and the nation he was elected to serve, down a socialist crapper.
* A PIG-worthy Elephant Clan Oval Office contender who is deadly serious about shutting down at least 5 federal departments before he breaks for lunch on his first day in office.
* The signed, sealed, and delivered, irrevokable resignation of every civilian federal employee from sea to shining sea..
* A Christmas devoid of the depressingly familiar Grinchiness from Evangelizing Atheists, Secularists, Torah True Believers, and all the other chronically offended, fringe-dwelling wingnuts.
* A popular uprising - a Second American Revolution - with a single stated goal: restoring our birthright of INALIENABLE individual liberty. "We hold these truths to be self-evident"? You better f-ing believe it, it's about damn time, Sparky.
* At least one boom box station which provides weekend programming which entertains, enlightens and/or inspires.
* A heretofore 'lost', final, quatrain by Nostradamus which reads, "If you believed any, or all, of that happy horse shit, I have this awesome bridge that I'd love to sell you", signed Michel 'Shecky' de Nostredame.
* A great meal in my favorite eatery which is NOT disrupted by some asshat's insane bellowing into his cell phone blight.
* A street legal 'get out of jail free' card which allows me to bitch-slap any Bluetooth butthead who gets in my face while talking into one of the damn things.
Is that too much to ask? Probably.
|
NOVEMBER 2011
|
Atheist Evangelism 2011
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts [11/20/11]
Tis the season and that means it's time for those relentless funsters, the Evangelizing Atheists, to do what they can to thrill the snot out of religionists, in general, and Cross Cultists, in particular. In many ways, this year's atheist evangelism is business as usual. That means that, once again, the primary method of atheist/agnostic evangelism involves signs, billboards and strategically placed advertisements on public transportation. It has been happening for several months, but seems to be following a well-established pattern, by reaching a peak, during the Christmas season.
Admittedly, the pattern is playing out in a familiar fashion. It's familiar, but there is a difference, this year. A couple years ago, the following Hambo prose summed up the tone of 2008 vintage atheist evangelism:
Depending on the group, and/or individual, behind the sign, it can be as benign as the one shown in the accompanying image - "Reason's Greetings" says it all, for this pagan. In some places another, slightly more assertive, sign, which appeared on billboards and busses, reads "Imagine No Religion". These 'in your face' statements of non-belief can also be as provocative as the one that has true believer panties wadded from sea to shining sea: "Religion is but myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds." (A sign by the Freedom From Religion Foundation which was set up next to a nativity in Washington's state capitol.)
This year, some evangelizing atheists living behind the Orange Curtain (Mexifornia's conservative bastion, Orange County) got an early start (late October), when they deployed a billboard invoking Thomas Jefferson via this quote: "I do not find in Christianity one redeeming feature. It is founded on fables and mythology."
There's just one devilish detail that the evangelizing atheists didn't pin down, before they deployed their billboard. According to the minions at the Jefferson Library Collection at Monticello it's not a legitimate Jefferson quote. In fact, if the evangelizing atheists had asked them about it, the Jefferson Library Collection minions would have informed them that it's enshrined on its page of 'spurious Jefferson quotes'.
So far this year, the evangelizing atheists haven't rocked my world, like they did in 2010 with a sign that Canada's evangelizing atheists deployed on busses in British Columbia: "Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence. Allah Bigfoot UFOs, Homeopathy, Zeus, Psychics, Christ".
WOW! When you lump those who worship Allah and/or Jesus in the same category as someone who believes in Bigfoot, that's throwing down the gauntlet.
Admittedly, evangelizing atheism is, on occasion, 'fun'. Despite that, I, too, wonder 'what's the point'? What, exactly are these 'religion sucks' adherents trying to accomplish? There are, I think, several viable possibilities:
• It's a plaintive wail by atheists/agnostics that "We're people too." It's, in essence, similar to the GLAAD BAAG mantra: "We're here. We're queer. We're in your face."
• It's a blatant frontal assault on supernaturalism, in essence, a throwing down of the philosophical gauntlet. If it's a debate on the merits of supernaturalism vs reason, "Bite me, supernaturalism breath" strikes me as the wrong opening move.
• It's their way of getting into the Christmas spirit, which, in this case, involves pissing off as many true believers as possible. If that's the goal, it's time to bring W's "Mission Accomplished" banner out of mothballs.
• It's nothing more than an exercise in free speech. In this instance, the atheists/agnostics would seem to be saying, "You're promoting your supernaturalism" in the public square which was paid for, in part, with my non-believer dime. It's only fair that I promote my philosophy in that same public square, which was paid for, in part, with your true believer dime."
• It's nothing more, nothing less, than a plea by otherwise unremarkable individuals, for everyone's attention.
What, you ask, does a pagan scribbler named Hambo think of all this theist vs atheist panty-twisting angst? I'm as ambivalent to these atheist 'tis the season' antics as I am to a Nativity scene in the public square. Neither of them rocks my world. Neither of them rots my socks. I do, however, like many things about the Christmas season:
• I like the Christmas music - taken in small, manageable doses - and that includes secular and holy roller carols alike.
• I like the decorations.
• I like the way tykes get giddy over Santa Claus.
• I like that sappy movie, 'A Christmas Story'.
• I like everything about the Santa Claus part of Christmas. If the Cross Cultists, the Kwanza Klub, the Torah True Believers and, yes, the atheists, have their own agenda at this time of year, so be it. I will enjoy Christmas for my own reasons, in my own way, and that's final.
Parting shot I: I am compelled to admit that the bus sign that invoked Bigfoot made me laugh. Is it snarky? Yup. Is it insulting? Probably. Is it an stunning example of political incorrectness on an epic level? You better believe it, Sparky.
Parting shot II: This year, the evangelizing atheists dazzled me with a jaw-dropping outburst of hubris. How? How indeed:
Atheists and humanists serving in the U.S. military are leading an organized push for official recognition of their own chaplains, or something akin to chaplains. They contend that they are being left out, even though they say they outnumber participants in established religions. (CNSNews)
An Atheist Chaplin? Seriously? Holy Oxymoron, Batman! If you think this is evangelizing atheist flummery, get over it:
Former Army Capt. Jason Torpy, president of the Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers, contends the number of humanists in the military is between 10,000 and 40,000 and argues that many who do not claim a religious preference are likely atheists.
His organization, which he said has been a 501(c)(3) organization for five years, is leading the charge to install humanist clergy in the military.
Torpy said that under current rules, Catholic chaplains refer Muslims to Muslim military clergy, while a Muslim clergy is obligated to direct Jewish members of the military to a Jewish military clergy and so on. But, he said, humanists are left out when it comes to a support system.
"Those are all putting them in touch with their people," Torpy told CNSNews.com. "So in that way, humanists can provide that same service and just as important, all the currently serving chaplains who are Jewish or Hindu or Muslim need to provide that connection and that support and that recognition and affirmation to humanists as well."
Under the current practice, he said, the Department of Defense is using a religious test for public office, something that is specifically prohibited in the Constitution, and a standard that is biased toward theistic religions.
"The Department of Defense has kind of a definition of religion, but they only have one kind of religious test for public office," Torpy said. (CNSNews)
Atheist Chaplins takes 'edgy' evangelizing atheism to a whole new level.
Hambo Meltdown of the Week
Source: Hambo's Hammer
Enough Already
The list of infuriating bullshit that MAJORLY pisses me off is getting longer.
* I'm fed up with Kim Kardashian, whose only claim to fame is a pathetic sex tape on which her flopping and moaning evoked images of the frantic final moments of a beached whale's life.
* I'm fed up with the Marxist assholes pretending to be objective journalists. They seem to be the ONLY ones who don't know that they'll be the first ones rounded up, if/when Marxism reigns from sea to shining sea: goodbye newsroom; hello gulag.
* I'm fed up with the Herman Cain bimbo eruption that sucks up all the air time on VRWC talk radio. How many times, every f**king day, must I listen to the same reports, the same commentary, the same boring bullshit, before I grab Old Betsy and head for the nearest bell tower?
* I'm fed up with the occutards whose only 'accomplishment' is turning American cities, from sea to shining sea into open sewers which are infested by rapists, muggers, drug dealers, disease-ridden urban campers, and property destroying assholes.
* I'm fed up with celebrity 'justice' which talks tough, then wimps out when it comes to making the legend in his, her, hisher, or its own mind reap what he, she, heshe, or it sowed.
* I'm fed up with a court system that's teaching thespian bimbos like Lindsay Lohan, that, for her, no matter what she does...no matter how many laws and/or court rulings she violates, there are NOT any adverse consequences.
* I'm fed up with the bait and switch bullshit that the Republican Party calls a presidential primary.
* I'm disgusted with the Republican Party scam artists who perpetrate this sham of a primary, making voters think they have a choice, when it comes to picking the Oval Office candidate.
* I'm infuriated that the Republicans will play 'it's his turn', by ramming another liberal loser - Mitt Romney - down the throats of Elephant Clan primary voters.
* I'm outraged by Elected Tormentors, who feign shock and dismay over America's sorry condition, then brazenly pretend that they didn't play a critical role in flushing this once great nation down the crapper.
* I'm beyond pissed when it comes to a Dumbo-earred Commie who obviously despises the job he was elected to do, but refuses to get out of the damn way so somebody with legitimate POTUS credentials can take over then put America back on the right track.
* I'm fed up with a certain publisher's dithering, when it comes to replacing his seizure-prone computer.
* I'm fed up with the motherless rat bastards whose idea of a joke is this ASININE Daylight Savings Time bullshit.
Enough already...it's time for Old Betsy, Big Bang, and I to load up then go do what we gotta do.
ENTITLE THIS, PARASITE BREATH!
Source: Top Story Archive
Entitlement, n.
A class warfare based, Nanny State pyramid scheme which gives money stolen from achievers to the chronically needy to make the parasite scumbags stop caterwauling.
(PIG's Dictionary of Words and Phrases)
A battle is raging for the heart, the soul, and the iconic character of America. It's a titanic battle which pits that American classic, the rugged individual, against a relative newcomer, the relentlessly greedy parasite. It's a battle which, based simply on that arch-enemy of Korrectness - merit - the rugged American individual should win. He should, so why is this American classic losing? Why indeed?
Rugged American individuals make few demands. All they need is a liberty-intensive environment that will allow them to strut their stuff in that impartial arbiter of individual merit, the marketplace. Ironically, this rugged American individualism is exemplified by legal immigrants, who arrive in this once great nation with little more than their hopes and dreams. Driven by their inherent work ethic, these legal immigrants, time, and time again, show native born Americans what one highly motivated individual can accomplish.
The other side of the immigration coin, the relentlessly greedy parasite, is best illustrated by another kind of immigrant, the kind who swarms over our undefended borders, uninvited. Unlike their legal immigrant counterpart, these parasites are burdened down by their insatiable need. Since their native land sucks, they feel entitled to be coddled, pampered, and supported by legal American denizens.
A Mexifornia Colonista, 17-year-old Gladys Castro, is a suitable example.
Since she arrived in Mexifornia as an 8 year old border jumper, Gladys has benefitted from American largess, as an outstanding scholar at a taxpayer funded cess-school. Is she thankful for the $100,000 American taxpayers shelled out for her education? Not exactly. Gladys is whining, because her border jumper status prevents her from getting more taxpayer dollars to pay for her tuition at UC Berkeley. In order to get a taxpayer funded student loan, Gladys needs something she doesn't have and can't readily obtain, a Social Security number.
I know what you're thinking and you're wrong. This isn't another border jumping scumbag tantrum. Gladys isn't singled out for her immigration status. She was singled out for her inherent feeling of 'entitlement'. Did she arrive her with that 'gimme because I'm entitled' chip on her shoulder? Perhaps, but I doubt it.
No dummy - her 4.09 GPA proves that - I think Gladys Castro learned her entitlement mentality, after she arrived here.
She learned it from a tenured teacher who is 'entitled' to a 'can't be fired, under any circumstances' job.
She learned it from Colonista 'activists' who indoctrinated Gladys, when they assigned her the holy hyphen.
She learned it from public employee union members who are 'entitled' to a job for life at an inflated rate of pay and a guaranteed retirement program which makes the highest paid CEO green with envy.
Last, but far from least, she learned it from Prompter Punk who made the entitlement mentality the cornerstone of his regime. In this case, I'm referring, of course, to those entitlements which are an Elected Tormentor's favorite tool. In this slacker-dominated era, entitlements are employed by Elected Tormentors who want to pay off these relentlessly needy parasites who will punch a chad for them if the price is right.
Entitlements have been around for decades, but there's a systemic problem that's getting worse: the demands of the relentlessly needy keep escalating.
• Minimum wage was cool, at first, but, too soon, the parasites were demanding a living wage.
• Unemployment checks were cool, at first, but, too soon, the parasites started demanding a promotion to the welfare check gravy train.
• Guaranteed healthcare in a hospital emergency room got it done, at first, but, too soon, the parasites wanted to graduate to a doctor's waiting room via Nanny State funded universal healthcare. They got their 'entitlement' and the taxpayers, many of them unborn, got Nanny State debt, which exceeds our annual GDP.
• 'Free' public Educrap was cool, except it's just too hard, so budding parasites in training demanded a high school diploma and a college scholarship just for showing up for roll call each morning.
• Public housing, rent control and housing subsidies are spiffy, but parasites feel entitled to much, much, more. They demanded, and got, a Nanny State mandated right to purchase a home, no matter how financially unsuited they are. As a result of their home ownership entitlement, a housing bubble developed, then burst, leading to an international financial collapse.
None of this is breaking news to rational adults who have been there, heard that, from the Free State of PIG for years. It's a tragically familiar part of America's parasite culture. None of that has changed, but there are troubling new hints that this culture of entitlement is creeping into unexpected places.
• CEOs of financial institutions are entitled to elude that nasty 'reaping what you sow' element of objective reality. Why? One of their homeboys is Secretary of the Treasury, plus, two of their bought and paid for Elected Tormentors (Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd) are in a perfect position to refill those empty, financial institution, coffers with taxpayer money.
• CEOs of American automakers are entitled to sidestep the richly deserved fate that ensues when you make catastrophically bad business decisions. Why? The unions, whose insane contract demands paved this highway to hell with red ink, are key Demoncrat constituents who played a critical role in ushering in the Obamunist Error.
If you have the stomach for it, you can shrug off a parasite's cacophony of caterwauling. If you can tolerate the stench, you can bulldoze your way through a parasite's barrage of self-serving bull crap. It's a dirty job, but a necessary one, if you want to get to the heart of the matter, where an essential question demands an answer.
Does a parasite's unrequited need place a mandate for the unearned on an achiever - our rugged American individual? For that answer, I defer to one of my muses:
'No man can have a right to impose an unchosen obligation, an unrewarded duty or involuntary servitude on another man. There can be no such thing as "the right to enslave."
A right does not include the material implementation of that right by other men; it includes only the freedom to earn that implementation by one's own effort.' (The essay, 'Man's Rights' by Ayn Rand)
Ayn Rand's meaning is clear, but, if you need it spelled out for you, I'm up to the challenge.
Gladys Castro has the freedom to get a first rate education. She does not, however, have an inherent 'right' (she's not automatically entitled) to make me pay her $30,000 a year tuition at UC Berkeley.
If he's financially qualified, Peter Parasite has the freedom to try to purchase a home. He does not, however, have the inherent 'right' to coerce me into guaranteeing his mortgage with my tax dollars.
Sally Schoolmarm has the freedom to pursue a teaching career. She does not, however, have the inherent 'right' to make me keep her on the payroll when her job performance sucks.
Harry Hyphenated has the freedom to seek gainful employment, and make the best deal his skills merit. He does not, however, have the inherent 'right' to force an employer to hire him at an inflated wage that's dictated by the Nanny State.
Stan Slacker has the freedom to seek voluntary assistance in getting his life together. He does not, however, have the inherent 'right' to demand that I put food on his plate, a roof over his head, and money in his pocket because he's a ward of the taxpayer funded Nanny State.
Charlie CEO has the freedom to be as stupid, as reckless, as he wants with stockholder money. He does not, however, have the inherent 'right' to force the American taxpayer pay for his stupidity, by making good his losses.
Ernie Elected Tormentor has the freedom to be as generous as he wants with his friends and supporters. He does not, however, have the inherent 'right' to make the American taxpayer finance his pork barrel beneficence.
It's simply a matter of time, before the entitlement culture reaches critical mass during the Obamunist regime. Why? Because entitlement is based on immutable traits and/or group affiliation, instead of an individual's skills, experience and accomplishments. Group think, anti-individualism, is the cornerstone of Messiah Barry's political agenda.
The entitlement culture might rock Messiah Barry's world, but it doesn't rock mine. Nobody is entitled to the unearned fruits of an other person's labor. Nobody is entitled to demand that Uncle Sam go out and mug an achiever, then give the parasite a cut because the slacker is unwilling, or unable, to EARN it for himself.
The only things you are entitled to are set forth in the Declaration of Independence: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If you want more than that, you're required to go out and EARN it. The United States Constitution is NOT a license to rob achiever Peter to pay parasite Paul.
Enough is enough! I'm fed up with the entitlement mentality. I'm fed up with parasites who demand that somebody else supply their unrequited needs. If they can't persuade another individual to INVEST in their future, VOLUNTARILY, then they need to polish up their sales pitch and Emerilize their qualifications. That might not be the Obama Regime's style. It might not be 'the Chicago way', but it's absolutely the American way.
It's time to condemn the entitlement mentality to history's scrap heap while we still have time. We the People need to get back to basics. We the People need to restore that iconic figure, that American classic, the rugged American individual, to his, her, hisher, or its rightful place in our nation. We the People need to act NOW, while there's still time.
You're ENTITLED? Not on my dime and never in my America, parasite pinhead Sparky. |
OCTOBER 2011
|
Halloween Party
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts
[Yes, this is one of those 'what costume should they wear' rants. Yes, this idea has been done to death. I get all that, but don't really give a rat's ass. I think you'll agree that, this one has a worthwhile 'moment', or two.]
If, on behalf of America, the Free State of PIG threw a Halloween Party, here are some of the horrors who might show up. You see them at a safe distance, on the boob tube or the Internet. You hear them on the radio. You see them leave a stinking stain in your fishwrap. Now, imagine your 'thrill', when they show up at our Halloween Party, trying to prove that you really can fool some of the people all of the time.
We predict that, like it or not, the following Halloween costumes will etch themselves in your memory:
Dressed in a baseball uniform, Harold Camping would portray the title character of Ernest Lawrence Thayer's poem: 'Casey at the Bat'. It's a compelling choice, since, like the Mighty Casey, Harold Camping is best known for 'striking out' as a doomsday prophet.
Mitt Romney wouldn't fool anyone, when he arrived dressed as a flipflop. It might be a joke to him, but I'm not laughing.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz should arrive, dressed up as a giant Kotex. I don't know why she made that call, but it's very appropriate, since she's always on the rag.
Dressed as a court jester, Joe Biden would keep hopping around on one foot, because the other foot would be lodged in his mouth. This would save us the trouble of slapping a muzzle on this yammering idiot.
Sarah Palin would arrive dressed as Joan of Arc, a costume which we deem very appropriate, since the press punks and disgruntled Palinistas like Tammy Bruce, who would be dressed as Catholic clerics, keep trying to burn Sarah at the stake.
Angelina Jolie would wow us, when she arrived dressed as the Pied Piper. Things would get touchy, later, after she got too close to her role and tried to make off with the pick of the tyke litter.
Messiah Barry Obama would demonstrate his usual lack of imagination, by showing up dressed in his Jesus robes. We'd need to keep fishing Barry out of the swimming pool, when he tried, repeatedly, to prove that he really can walk on water. No matter how hard we would try, we probably couldn't make him understand the difference between flip-flops and water wings.
Congressman Barney Frank's costume wouldn't really be a costume at all, since it's the outfit he wears on weekends, when he's wandering on the docks trolling for sailors: a pair of chaps. Trust me, the sight of Barney's flabby butt flapping the breeze will haunt you for YEARS.
Crammed into a pair of terrifyingly tight pants, Kim Kardashian would appear, at first glance, to be dressed as a piece of fruit. It would take us a while to realize that we are looking at her Jupiter size butt, not a costume shaped like an over-ripe, over-size, peach.
The attendees would have one very anxious moment, when a Sasquatch crashed the party. About the time I finally unlimbered Old Betsy, I would realized that it wasn't a free-ranging yeti, after all. It would be, in fact, Lamar Odom's beastly bride, Sasquatch Kardashian.
The festivities would hit another, fun killing, speed bump, when some guests arrived at the PIG Bunker dressed as cops. They would be very convincing, especially, when they nailed us for making too much noise. We, belatedly, would realize, that, once again, our humor challenged neighbors had called the cops to complain about our high volume PIGish fun.
Life is just one damn thing after another.
Misplaced Priorities
Source: Hambo's Hammer [10/08/11]
Apparently, I have it all wrong, when it comes to the presidency of this nation conceived in liberty. I had the silly idea that the Oval Office is a seat of secular power, the qualifications for which are set forth in Article II of the United States Constitution. Apparently, I'm tragically deluded on that score.
Somewhere along the line, the Oval Office stopped being the seat of secular power and became an outpost of supernaturalism. When, exactly, did the Oval Office become the Oval Pulpit? When did the White House stop being the president's domicile and start being a Toll Booth on the Highway to Heaven? When, exactly, did the United States of America become a Theocracy whose ruler must pass a rigid, no exceptions allowed, theology exam that delves into every conceivable element of the Evangelical flavor of Cross Cultism? I haven't got a clue.
In a rerun of the 2008 election cycle, some Cross Cultists, are painting a rhetorical bull's-eye on Mitt Romney's Mormonism. Yes, again! If you're thinking 'here we go again', join the club. Instead of Mike Huckabee, the mud-slinging supernaturalist is a Toll Taker (Man of the Cloth) who is, some 'insiders' opine, doing Rick Perry's dirty work:
On Friday, Robert Jeffress, a senior pastor at First Baptist Church in Dallas who supports Texas Gov. Rick Perry and introduced him at the Values Voters Summit, called Mormonism a "cult" in remarks to reporters.
When Perry took the stage, he said Jeffress "hit it out of the ballpark" with his introductory remarks in which he called the Texas governor a "proven leader, a true conservative and a committed follower of Christ."
But Perry's camp said later that Perry disagreed with Jeffress description of Mormonism as a "cult" and that the Values Voters Summit organizers chose the pastor to introduce the Texas governor. (Fox News)
Robert Jeffress must have a different version of the United States Constitution than the one I use: the pocket-size book put out by the Cato Institute. Unlike my copy, Toll Taker Bob's contains a religious litmus test that, automatically, disqualifies a pagan like me. His special copy makes a Mormon like Mitt Romney equally unsuitable. Why? Because neither of us conforms to Toll Taker Bob's brand of religiosity.
I have a hot flash for Toll Taker Bob and his Evangelical homeboys. Religiosity isn't high on my list of hot button Oval Office qualifiers. I don't care how a candidate views the Trinity, the virgin birth and assorted other things that rock Roberty Jeffress' world. I'm much more interested in silly things like:
*What is the candidate's track record on minimizing government and maximizing individual liberty?
*How will the candidate handle our sworn, Jihadikaze enemies who seek nothing less than our utter and complete destruction?
*What is the candidate's track record on defending this nation's sovereignty by rolling up the 'welcome' mat and smacking the border jumping scumbags with it?
*What has the candidate done to remove the Nanny State from the marketplace?
*Which government departments and programs will be the first ones that the candidate will eradicate if he, she, heshe or it is elected.
*What has the candidate done to prove that they have a healthy respect for, and mounted a rousing defense of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"?
The next Oval Office occupant already has a full plate with those legitimate presidential functions set forth in Article II of the U.S. Constitution. Isn't about time they paid attention to the president's real job, instead of playing 'gotcha' with the Evangelical's theological litmus test?
There are more than enough chinks in Romney's political armor without all this "Did you know that - GASP - he's a MORMON?" bull crap.
Parting Shots: Here is some additional information on this bull crap:
Item: Why is Hambo so forceful on this matter?
I consider this 'is Romney the right kind of Christian' stuff an unnecessary distraction while we are in the process of selecting our next president. I have a very short fuse when it comes to stupidity and this crap screams MORONS.
Item: What set me off?
While listening toVRWC radio. I kept hearing one true believer after another sounding off on the fine points of Mormonism and why it's a 'cult'. Those pesky details were, for them, the be all, end all of presidential politics. Those devilish details seem to rock their world. They don't rock mine. Why? See the next item.
Item: What, exactly, do I know about Mormons?
More than you think. I spent some quality time in Utah...back in the day. I don't pretend to be an expert, but I do have more than a basic understanding of their faith. Are they weird? You bet. Are they 'deal breaker' weird? Not even close, despite magic underwear and getting baptized for the dead. I liked them then, and I like them now. Good people sums it up nicely.
Item: Is Mormonism a cult?
Not in the commonly accepted sense of the word, but I'm the wrong person to ask. Why? I consider all religions to be 'cults' - in the broadest possible sense of the word - in many ways. Is that a slam against all religions? Not necessarily. It simply recognizes certain underlying facts about supernaturalism. I won't elaborate, unless you press me for those dastardly details.
Item: Does character matter to a pagan scribbler?
You bet, but I don't measure an individual's moral fiber by the flavor of supernaturalism they profess. For me, 'actions speak louder than words' still rules the day. I don't care what Romney professes. I don't care about the details of his theology. I do care about the way he has conducted his life, and on that score, he seems to pass my personal 'character' criteria with flying colors.
Conclusion:
I keep remembering Ronald Reagan and his term in the Oval Office. He was a devout Christian, and I respected him for that. More important, to me, was his clear vision of what our government IS and how far it has strayed from what it OUGHT TO BE. I want more of that, and less of this "Mormonism is a cult" crap. |
SEPTEMBER 2011
|
THE GREAT AMERICAN NANNY STATE'S DIRTY LITTLE SECRETS
America's Nanny State nitwits view the United States Constitution as a pesky fact of life that could make their lives miserable, if they were compelled to comply with it. Thanks to a willing complicity on the part of Congress and the American court system, they are no longer required to adhere to all those pesky government restrictions that our Founding Fathers imposed on them when the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788 (The Bill of Rights were ratified in 1791).
SECRET I: CONSTITUTIONAL INVERSION
From the onset, our Elected Tormentors and the army of bureaucratic trolls who do their dirty work chafed under the U.S. Constitution's unambiguous restrictions on the federal government. They understand, too damn well, that the Founding Father's Constitutional game plan was to establish an island of government surrounded by an ocean of inalienable individual rights. Gradually, inexorably, deliberately, generations of Elected Tormentors inverted this original concept until, today, we have a small, shrinking, island of besieged individual rights that's surrounded by a relentlessly rising ocean of government.
One of the most annoying elements of this Constitutional inversion is the Brave New World of individual rights. I know what you're thinking: what about the Bill of Rights? The Bill of Rights is comprised of amendments that were created to underscore the uncontested fact that the U.S. Constitution did not give the federal government any power to intrude in certain vital areas of inalienable individual liberty: freedom of speech, the right to keep and bear arms, the right to peaceably assemble. In the Brave New World of rights the preferred mantra goes as follows: "Where does the Constitution give two male individuals the right to marry? Where does the U.S. Constitution give an individual the right to smoke pot? Blah, blah, blah" The short answer is obvious: "It doesn't." We know that the Constitution does not contain an exhaustive list of individual rights. Why should it? The Constitution is, from start to finish, a document that places explicit restrictions on government. The better question about rights is this: "Where does the Constitution give the federal government - explicitly - the right to dictate when and how an individual can exercise his freedom of speech 30 days before an election? Where does the U.S. Constitution, explicitly, give the feds the right to tell a business how it should operate, what it can manufacture and whom it should hire?"
The Founding Father's views on rights - and the Bill of Rights - is contained in the egregiously neglected 9th Amendment:
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Constitutional Inversion is the dirty Nanny State secret that turned an ocean of rights into a shrinking island of rights. It sucks and it utterly and completely pisses me off.
SECRET II: THE COMMERCE CLAUSE
The preferred weapon employed by Nanny State nitwits who are eager to intrude into our lives is the Constitution's commerce clause. Willfully stretching the original meaning beyond recognition, the Beltway bozos give themselves the power to intrude in every aspect of our lives. For example, in a 2005, ruling the U.S. Supreme court ruled that, under the commerce clause, the Capitol Hill cretins had the right to impose federal marijuana laws on an individual who grew pot for his own use, on his own land and never tried to sell it. Why? Because some-damn-how his activities impacted the "current" of commerce.
For those who want a hint on the real purpose of the commerce clause, here's Hambo's far from scholarly assessment. During the Colonial period, each colony was a separate entity with its own ties back to the crown and the English government. The individual colonies were like mini nations with their own laws, charters, and trade practices. When they banded together to fight for independence, then form a new nation, the old mini nation concept had to be scrapped. The way to build a single nation out of individual colonies/states was to take down the barriers that made it difficult for citizens, goods and services to move from one state to the next. The commerce clause gave the new federal government the power to prevent an individual state from erecting trade barriers with its neighboring states. That, as I understand it, is the original meaning of the commerce clause.
In the ensuing centuries, the commerce clause was inflated to give the Beltway bozos the power to dictate such things as: auto design, broadcast content standards, educrap standards, regulate the hiring practices of private firms, dictate food content, restrict drug availability. The list is long and getting longer every damn day.
Here's an excerpt from a well-written article on the meaning and abuse of the commerce clause: Interstate Commerce Myth
The authority to regulate trade is identical among the States as with foreign countries, and what you cannot regulate among foreign countries is equally prohibited among the States. If Congress cannot prohibit citizens of Moscow from growing pot in their backyards, then they are equally prohibited from outlawing backyard pot growing within the jurisdiction of local governments in the United States. (Federalist Blog: Interstate Commerce Myth)
The instant the federal court system stamped a seal of judicial approval on this expansive "if you can tie it to commerce, you can regulate it" interpretation, it opened a political Pandora's Box that unleashed an insatiable Nanny State on our individual liberty. This egregious misinterpretation of the commerce clause led to the liberty-nuking carnage that followed.
SECRET III: THE PUBLIC BURDEN SCAM
The Nanny State's extra-constitutional intrusion into the health care marketplace - Medicare, DeathCare, and assorted other welfare state crap - rolled out the red carpet for a gem that's the weapon of first resort for socialists and shysters. It's called "the public policy issue" scam and it gives these scumbags an excuse to plunder capitalists deep pockets and dictate, in great specificity, how they must run their business. A prime example is the on-going Tobacco Jihad.
The Tobacco Jihad is erected on the dubious "public policy issue" canard. The argument is crude, but heretofore effective. Smokers are endangering their health. By endangering their health with this legal, but unhealthy, product, they impose "costs" on the Nanny State. Therefore, when the smoker incurs these healthcare costs he "burdens" the Nanny State due to the Nanny State's extra-constitutional intrusion into the medical marketplace. The solution, according to the socialists and shysters, is to force the tobacco industry to "pay" the "costs" incurred when the Nanny State blatantly stuck it's nose where the U.S. Constitution says it doesn't belong. This public burden scamnailed tobacco growing and manufacturing capitalists for billions of dollars. Did this extorted money go to compensate the Nanny State for its expenses? Get real. The lion's share of it lined the pockets of shyster scumbags. The remainder went to various states to give them more ill-gotten boodle to spread around. Bottom line: the shysters get richer and the socialists get more power to intrude into our lives.
The "public burden" scam was so amazingly successful - and profitable for shysters - that the same scumbags are gearing up for another assault on American capitalists. This time, the target is "big food". They're using the game plan that worked so well in the Tobacco Jihad. First, they flood an eager to spread the bad news media with the health dangers of trans fatty acids, and assorted other fates worse than death. Next, they try to coerce "big food" into "voluntary" compliance. Finally, declaring that the situation is a national crisis, they invoke "public policy issue", trot out dubious studies and statistics about the dangers of trans fatty acids, then go to court to "recoup" the healthcare costs incurred by the Nanny State. Once the process is complete and "big food" is plucked clean, they'll start looking for another set of deep, capitalist pockets to pick. They won't stop until they've cleaned out every-damn-body.
SECRET IV: STRINGS ATTACHED
The Beltway bozos are complete scumbags, but, they're not stupid and that last fact makes them especially dangerous. They devised a devilishly simple way to intrude into our daily lives. I like to call this gambit: "Our money, our rules". The plan is, as usual, crude but damn effective. First, they kindly "offer" to share the "costs" of certain activities that are, per the U.S. Constitution, beyond their control. Educrap is a prime example. Spouting drivel about their concern for the educational development of American tykes, these Beltway bozos are generous to a fault. HOWEVER, there's the fine print to consider. "Since you're taking our money" the Beltway bozos insist, "you are required to follow our Draconian rules about how you conduct your business". With that foot in the door, the Beltway bozos dictate, in great specificity how, what, where, and upon whom the educrap is perpetrated.
Setting aside the fun fact that it's not the Nanny State's money - it's your money that they stole from you - this "our money our rules" crap is depressingly effective. I'm compelled to admit that few, if any, Educrats can resist the Siren song of "free" money. Strings or no strings, they're ready, willing and downright eager to grab as much of it as they can. The same, is true for various other American entities who take "free" money from, or do business with the Nanny State.
SECRET V: WILLFUL NEGLECT
The dirtiest Nanny State secret isn't that big a secret. I'm referring to the fact that the Nanny State willfully and deliberately neglects one of its legitimate functions: safeguarding our nation's borders. The Nanny State nitwits are so busy doing all the crap that the Constitution forbids them from doing, they can't/won't take the time to fulfill one of their primary, unambiguous functions: safeguarding our nation's borders.
Sometimes this willful neglect is driven by ulterior motives. In part, that's the case here. Key members of the Nanny State - Vincente W. Bush and Chico Obama come to mind - flat out do not want to secure our borders. Why? In W's case the reasons aren't clear. It does appear that he's obsessed with establishing a border erasing, American Union patterned, in part, after the European Union. There's probably more to it than that, but I'm not sure that it matters. In Obama's case, his willful neglect of our porous borders is part of his blatant bid for Hugo Chavez class perpetual, personal, politicial power.
The primary reason for willful neglect is political inertia. Quite simply, it's much easier to do nothing and hope that the problem will magically resolve itself or mutate to a form that's not politically radioactive. We saw this at work in the mid 60's when the Capitol Hill cretins perpetrated the first "final solution" to the border jumping scumbag problem. Twenty years later, the problem got radioactive again, so they perpetrated the "final solution II", an amnesty program that succeeded beyond their wildest dreams in making the trickle of border jumpers turn into a goddamn tidal wave. This same "if we ignore it long enough it will go away" thinking is starting to take hold on Capitol Hill concerning the Jihadikaze rat bastards who are so eager to destroy us. If ignoring our Jihadikaze problems works as well as ignoring the border jumping scumbag invasion, I'm house-hunting on Pluto.
PARTING SHOTS
Is there any reasonable way to stop the Nanny State from swallowing us, our liberty, completely with their Dirty Little Secrets? Yes, but it won't be easy, or popular. The ultimate Dirty Little Secret is that, in too many cases, sovereign individuals allowed Nanny State largess to transform them from rugged, self-reliant individuals into parasitic wards of the all powerful Nanny State. That makes the preferred solution - a return to Constitutional principals - a tough sell. Gloomy Gus that I am, I fear that it will take a complete collapse of the Great American Nanny State's house of cards to make a properly-Constitutional American government a viable option.
Assuming a critical mass of sovereign American individuals can be achieved, I'm convinced that a new Constitutional Convention will be needed to plug the loopholes that these power-obsessed Beltway bozos opened in the our nation's founding document. Until that glorious day arrives, learn to swim, PIGsters, because the ocean of government is thisclose to swamping our shrinking island of rights.
I hear you pounding your desks out there, PIGsters. I hear you bellowing: "What the hell does all this have to do with Political Correctness, Hambo?" It has everything to do with Political Correctness. Cultural Marxists rely on relentless Nanny State growth to help them snuff out our inalienable individual rights with their p.c. bovine excrement. Therefore, daring to believe in a limited, properly-constitutional government is the ultimate form of political incorrectness. Are we all on the same page now, doubting PIGster Sparky?
Setting The Record Straight
[Two years ago, We the People scared the crap out of the entrenched asshats who infest Washington D.C. Like a warning shot across the bow of a ship, the events of 09/12/2009 sent an unambiguous message to the Elected Tormentors: stop, right damn now.
Fast forward to the present and the Elected Tormentors have resorted to name calling, in an effort to stem the rising TEA Party Tide that pink slipped so many richly deserving Elected Tormentors in last year's mid-term elections.
To counteract this frontal assault on We the People, I am reposting the Top Story I posted about the 09/12/2009 demonstrations.]
ANSWERING THE CALL
On 9/12/09 a critical mass of sovereign American individuals demonstrated their resolve to defend their inalienable liberty.
In the wake of an event which the Obamunist media tried to ignore, attempted to minimize, then decided to denigrate - the 9/12/09 march on Washington - the FSOP feels the need to set the record straight. It wasn't a temper tantrum by Republicans who lost their mojo. It wasn't an assemblage of redneck rustics who had a racist hissy fit over a black president. It wasn't a faux protest funded by dark right-wing forces with deep pockets. It wasn't any of them.
If 9/12/09 wasn't any of those things, what was it? It was a mobilization, an initial marshaling, of liberty-venerating forces in the war for America. Both sides know that the stakes are high. Both sides know that the winner of this war gets to determine the fate, the future, of this land conceived in liberty. Both sides understand that only two outcomes are possible: inalienable individual liberty, or Nanny State slave shackles.
The first to take the field, the enemies of liberty staked out the high ground at the pinnacles of our government, in the middle decades of the 20th century. Entrenched inside their Beltway Bastion, the statists have done everything in their power to make their federal fortress impregnable.
Once secure in their Capitol Hill citadel, the two dominant elements within the enemy camp engaged in internecine warfare, a king-of-the-hill battle for the right to impose their will upon the clueless masses outside the citadel. Snake-fascinated, the masses deluded themselves into thinking that one side, or the other, had their best interests at heart, a brain-fart for which they paid dearly, as both sides fleeced the masses of their liberty and property.
On January 20, 2009, the final battle for America began, when an unrepentant, America hating, capitalism despising, Marxist was inaugurated as President - Messiah for Life - of the United States. Full of themselves, and 'it', a tidal wave of glassy-eyed Obamunists threw down the gauntlet on that day, daring any free ranging rational adults to come and pick it up. Would any sovereign individuals dare to invade the Beltway Bastion?
On September 12, 2009, the largest assemblage of sovereign American individuals in the history of the USA - realistic estimates range from 500,000 to 1,500,000 - invaded the Beltway Bastion to accept the challenge thrown down on January 20, 2009.
For the first time, since 1776, the battlelines are clearly defined. For the first time, since 1776, the stakes are so high, that sovereign individuals are motivated to set aside business as usual, to defend the core principles which make America that beacon of liberty, the Shining City on the Hill.
The statist enemy is led by a malignant narcissist, a man who believes everything the Broadcast Blowjob Brigade spews about him. The weapons at his disposal are formidable. He enjoys a captive, power-obsessed, congress that is led by Elected Tormentors who have spent decades embedding themselves in their seats of power. He has a slavishly subservient mainstream media which will warp objective reality into any shape the Narcissist-In-Chief wants or needs. He has millions of fanatically devoted foot soldiers who will unwaveringly, unquestioningly, follow his every order.
Opposing the intimidating power of the statist enemy is an aspiring tyrant's worst nightmare. It's a venerable force in American history which takes uphill battles against powerful, entrenched enemies in stride. It's a force of such renown, that it is honored - by name - with the opening words of the United States Constitution: We the People of the United States.
On 9/12/09, unlike the statists opposing them, America's sovereign individuals didn't gather under the banner of some POTUS wannabe, a legend in his own mind cable news clown, or a boom box host with a devoted, nationwide audience. Energized by their own, personal, motives, the sovereign individuals gathered together, voluntarily, for a common purpose. They don't need a standard bearer to lead them, because they understand that voluntary cooperation between sovereign individuals who are pursuing a common goal is the limitless source of American strength and resilience.
The meaning of 9/12/09 is clear. The battle for America has been joined, and it promises to be a prolonged, bruising, battle, where no quarter will be given, and surrender is not an option. The lines of battle are clearly defined and the fierce battles waged along them aren't for the fainthearted.
Limited, Properly-Constitutional Government vs Unrestrained Nanny State Growth
Statists view the U.S. Constitution as an archaic relic of America's ignoble, white, racist, past which needs to be abolished, to unleash the full, coercive power of the Nanny State. Ideally, it should be abolished completely, since its devilish details prevent the Narcissist-In-Chief from achieving Hugo "Skipper" Chavez class, tyrant for life status. On the other hand, if they simply ignore it, that gets them there, too.
Sovereign individuals are, belatedly, confronting the fact that, for at least a century, Elected Tormentors have willfully, deliberately, exceeded their legitimate, Constitutional authority. Fed up with these Elected Tormentor power plays, sovereign Individuals mobilized to restore the U.S. Constitution, as the Founding Fathers intended it: a document which sets strict, non-negotiable limits on the Nanny State, by clearly delineating the government's powers.
Individualism vs Group Think
Statists have dazzled their glassy-eyed devotees with a steaming load of crap called the group identity. Under this fetid folly, each member of the statist horde is hounded into trading in his, her, hisher or its individual identity (and the accountability that goes with it), in exchange for one, or more, group labels. The most popular labels are based on immutable traits and/or lifestyle choices, but many seek a false sense of security in one of the approved political labels, like 'progressive', 'moderate', or 'liberal'.
Sovereign individuals know that the greatness of America lies in the untapped potential that resides inside each of its sovereign individuals. They realize that this powerful force is much too valuable to squander for the sake of a label based on immutable characteristics, or culturally-derived affiliations. Individual liberty, the kind immortalized by Thomas Jefferson's historic tribute to sovereign individualism - The Declaration of Independence - requires that each of us refuses to be diminished by a group identity. It requires that each of us refuses to be pigeonholed by a one-size-fits-all label. Sovereign individuals understand that, if you want to be counted, you must put yourself on the line as that utterly American entity, an individual.
Capitalism vs Nanny State Restrictions
Statists are like a tyke using a magnifying glass to torch ants on an ant hill. They're endlessly amused by the way their victims struggle to overcome the artificial barriers that they put in their path. Statists find an American dreamer's resolve to crawl up the ladder of success through hard work and applied intelligence laughable. If the poor fool is willing to pay the fare at each Nanny State toll gate...if he's willing to keep going with the Nanny State's hand in his pocket, so be it. The joke is on that dreamer. If he succeeds, the Nanny State will pick him clean, before, and after, he dies.
Sovereign individuals took to the streets to demand that the greedy Nanny State bastards "knock it off". They have their hands full going toe to toe with the marketplace, trying to build a better life for themselves, and their family. They busted their butt to earn their keep and all they demand from the Nanny State is their birthright to dispense with their own property, wealth, as they see fit.
Equal Opportunity vs Equality of Results
The statists turn reality on its head when they invoke a stinker called the level playing field. Instead of deploying a single, objective standard, statists use different criteria for each recognized group label. They believe that the primary purpose of government is to impose an equality of results through the coercive power of the Nanny State.
Sovereign individuals trust in their own ability, and view Nanny State 'assistance' as an insult. They welcome the challenge of testing themselves against an impartial standard like the marketplace and scholastic exams like the SATs. They believe that the only purpose of government is to create an environment that maximizes individual liberty, then gets the hell out of the way. Sovereign individuals call this 'an equality of opportunity'.
The events of 9/12/09 are replete with irony. The last time rank and file Americans took to the streets in vast numbers, the issues, then, as now, were profound. Many marched for racial justice, a goal they achieved when the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed into law. Elsewhere, during the middle decades of the 20th century, 'students' marched in the street to end an unpopular, tragically bungled, war. They, too, got what they wanted. The irony is that those 20th century protesters who waged battle with 'the establishment', have traded places with their enemy. In 2009, the civil rights marchers, the peace at any price pukes, have become the establishment. Now, the individuals marching in the streets of the nation's capitol - and in locations from sea to shining sea - are protesting THEM, the NEW establishment. Call me names if you must, but I suspect that the humor of the situation, the irony on steroids, eludes them.
What, you ask, does any of this have to do with the FSOP and political correctness? If you can't see that, we'll spell it out for you. The events of 9/12/09, and the battle they represent, are motivated by sovereign individuals who demand nothing less than their inalienable right to conduct their lives without unwanted Nanny State intrusions, plundering and/or safety nets. In this first year of the Obamunist Error, there's nothing more politically incorrect than a sovereign individual who stands up, in the center of the Beltway Bastion, and shouts, "Leave me the hell alone, you statist scumbags."
Was 9/12/09 a flash in the pan, or a declaration that America's sovereign individuals are finally prepared to fight for their liberty? That's your call, sovereign individual Sparky. Make that call now, because the statists are anticipating an uncontested victory.
Historical Amnesia
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts
"Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. "
- George Santayana
Conventional wisdom states that Americans have long memories, especially when it comes to seeking revenge, after we're attacked. That bit of American lore has the ring of truth, but it's not as etched in stone as it should be. On this tenth anniversary of the September 11 attacks, this is a perfect time to dust off those brain cells, jettison lesser concerns, and REMEMBER that we are in a WAR for our SURVIVAL. Before we get into that, this is a good time to review our history of remembering other historic moments in American history.
On April 21, 1836, at the Battle of San Jacinto, revenge minded Texans shouted 'Remember the Alamo' when they kicked Santa Anna's ass. Those outraged Texans made the Mexicans pay for that final, deadly, assault on the Alamo (March 6, 1836). The Mexican War (1846-1848) demonstrated that the Texans remembered the Alamo long after they secured their independence from Mexico. Predictably, those memories have faded, in the ensuing decades. It's human nature, and it's, invariably, a mistake. Texans might need to remember the Alamo again, if they want to save Texas from the new army of invading Mexicans. Remembering won't be popular, with all the Colonista bastards clamoring to roll out a red, 'here's your free citizenship, Chico' carpet for this new wave of invaders.
On February 15, 1898, while anchored in Havana harbor, the USS Maine, pride of the United States Navy, was blown up. The causes of the explosion are hotly debated to this very day. At the time, Americans rallied behind Uncle Sam, shouting "Remember the Maine", laying the blame for Maine's destruction at Spain's doorstep. Between April and July of 1898, Americans remembered the Maine and exacted a measure of revenge in a short, triumphant, war with Spain, that drove the last nail in Spain's globe-spanning empire. Afterwards, Americans quickly forgot this short war and got on with their lives. In 2008, nobody remembers the Maine, or the Spanish-American War, except those America hating Korrectniks who point to our acquisition of Cuba, the Philippines, Guam, and the Caroline Islands as proof of Uncle Sam's unrelenting Imperialism.
FDR called December 7, 1941 "a date which will live in infamy", and he was right. Americans did remember that infamous date, while our nation marched toward that final victory over Japan, on August 15, 1945. Many Americans, whose wounds never fully healed, remembered that infamous day, long after the last shots were fired. But, in the fullness of time, the pain of the wounds abated and that 'date which will live in infamy' faded into the background. Now, only the patriot few remember that infamous date and its painful lesson about the folly of letting down your guard. Today, their reward for sounding the warning is getting vilified as racists by peace at any price Korrectniks.
September 11, 2001 is another date which will live infamy. It is a date which America has never, so far, fully avenged. It is a date that should burn in our minds, when we remember our horror, then our rage, while we watched Jihadikaze asshats fly those airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. It is an infamous date that we vowed to honor by remembering the sacrifice of the courageous passengers on United Flight 93, who gave their lives to prevent another attack, by bringing the airliner down near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. September 11 is the infamous date when our world turned upside down and hurled us into a prolonged war against a determined, Jihadikaze enemy.
When we watched the planes fly into the World Trade Center, the anger seared the image in our brains.
When we watched valiant members of the NYPD and NYFD put their lives on the line by entering those mortally wounded buildings, we vowed to remember. Afterwards, we vowed to avenge the deaths of the 411 emergency responders who died during that heroic rescue attempt.
When we watched those glorious monuments to capitalism collapse into rubble, we vowed to remember it, avenge it.
When we watched the Islamikaze horde take to the streets to celebrate the murder of 2,998 'Infidels', the image of their antics was burned into our memories. Enraged, we promised to remember, and make these bastards pay.
When the identities of the 19 Jihadikazes were revealed, it told us what we already knew. The hijackers - 15 Saudis, 2 from the United Arab Emirates, 1 Egyptian, and 1 from Lebanon - were all Mecca Maniac asshats on a quest for those 72 virgins. At that instant, we knew the identity of the enemy - Jihadikazes - and what motivated them - Mecca Mania. From that moment, we were hell bent on making both pay for what happen on this date which MUST live in infamy.
In the days after September 11, we swore we'd make them pay, and we kept our word, for a while. We vowed that we'd hound Osama to the very gates of hell and beyond, until we put him out of our misery. We started off in rousing fashion, by storming into Afghanistan, where we kicked Osama's Taliban hosts out of power. Several times, we came close to nailing Osama, but never managed to seal the deal. We kept hounding him, but despite his attacks on us, we let politics blunt our thirst for vengeance.
Rank and file Americans never wavered in their quest for payback. Rank and file Americans refused to be distracted by the appeasers, the Quislings, and those among us who were actively giving aid and comfort to our sworn enemies. We kept on remembering, but it wasn't easy, because our leaders started to waver.
Unwilling to call a spade a spade, those entrusted with the prosecution of our war on Jihadikazes, went gutless and girlie, with bull crap about a War on Terror. We knew then...we know now...that terror is a TACTIC, not an entity. How are we expected to win a war, when our leaders are afraid to name the enemy? Islam, Islamikazes, make no bones about being at war with us. Why the hell are we afraid to respond with, "Right back at you, I'm going to nuke your Jihadikaze ass Sparky"?
While we did our best to keep those images from September 11, 2001 uppermost in our minds, the America hating scumbags, foreign and domestic, did everything in their power to subvert our efforts in this world-spanning battle.
Some Americans started to forget, when the nay sayers claimed that Uncle Sam had it coming for his many sins against the Religion of Peace.
Some Americans started to forget, when the peace pukes shouted 'Bush lied, soldiers died', distracting us with claims that the renewed attack on Iraq was W's way of cleaning up his daddy's unfinished 'Desert Storm' business.
Some Americans started to forget, after the News Nitwit Quislings tried to repeat their Vietnam War ending bull crap by vilifying, slandering, and dishonoring our brave men and women on the front lines in this war. They tried to make our warriors the villain, and, in too many cases, it worked.
Distracted by a looming recession, soaring oil prices, the housing bubble implosion, and a presidential election cycle, we allow ourselves to forget that we're still in a war for our survival. We're so distracted by our domestic concerns that we're forgetting that it's still a very dangerous world out there.
Jihadikazes are more determined than ever to destroy us, because they know something we've chosen to forget. They know that their pious tyranny is doomed as long as our liberty is alive and well.
While we're letting September 11, 2001, a date that MUST live in infamy, fade away in our memory, the Jihadikazes in Iran are working feverishly to amass enough nukes to make everyone from sea to shining sea glow.
While we're forgetting the anger that welled up inside us, when at least 200 people trapped in the World Trade Center jumped to their deaths, rather than be burned alive, the Jihadikaze Imams in Saudi Arabia export their liberty killing beliefs to America.
While we're forgetting the courage of the 40 passengers on United 93, Jihadikazes around the world, including the USA, are systematically undermining our free speech, and other inalienable liberties. Worst of all, WE LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT.
On this tenth anniversary of that date which MUST live in infamy, it's time to brush the cobwebs off our memories. It's time to brush aside lesser matters and get our priorities straight. It's time to remember who started this war, time to renew our resolve to WIN IT. It's time to remember that oil prices, economic woes, plummeting housing values and election cycles don't mean a damn thing if we don't secure the blessings of liberty. None of our petty, domestic, concerns matter, if we don't defend our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness against the Jihadikaze rat bastards who are determined to exterminate us.
If you value our liberty, forgetting is not a viable option.
Hambo's Annual Labor Day Rant.
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts
If you've ever wondered why the Free State of PIG doesn't honor Labor Day with a Top Story, wonder no more. Quite frankly, especially in the 21st century, the labor unions who exemplify this faux holiday aren't thrilling us spitless. That's especially true in 2011, after the highly publicized hissy fit, tantrum, and RAMPAGE that the labor unions perpetrated in Madison, Wisconsin, this Spring. Just getting started, they took their show on the road to Ohio, and New York, where Verizon's union employees indulged in thuggery, intimidation, and sabotage. There's a lot more of that crap which I could cite, but why bother, since you should all be up to speed on that, by now.
A day to honor labor unions? In 2011? Seriously? I don't think so. No matter what essential topic you name, they're on the wrong side of it. Given organized labor's deleterious impact on a sovereign individual's life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, the FSOP won't set aside a picosecond on September 5 to hoist a brewskie to honor BIG LABOR. Why? We refuse to give PIG props to the public employees unions, teachers union, and auto workers unions, or any other organized labor group which are key players in this increasingly oppressive Obamunist Error.
What, exactly, is Labor Day? If you cyber surf to the Department of Labor Internet speed bump, you'll learn that the American version of Labor Day dates back to 1882. You'll also find this high sounding, bureaucratic, bull crap to justify this salute to BIG LABOR:
Labor Day, the first Monday in September, is a creation of the labor movement and is dedicated to the social and economic achievements of American workers. It constitutes a yearly national tribute to the contributions workers have made to the strength, prosperity, and well-being of our country.
Social and economic achievements? Let's take a closer look at that.
Teachers unions are high on our list of groups that deserve to be nuked out of our misery. First, and foremost, being a tenured member of a teacher's union means you'll never have to hear the words "You're fired." No matter what you do, you'll never have to pay the piper for your incompetence. Hell, in most government cess schools, the only way you'll get in serious trouble with your union happens if you're foolish enough to educate your young charges instead of indoctrinating them.
In liberty-impoverished blights like Mexifornia, teachers unions are powerful political players who, routinely, impose their will on feckless Elected Tormentors and brain dead chad punchers. They shape the political landscape, with unrelenting advertising campaigns, which inhibit liberty and impoverish unwary achievers.
When it comes to unionized teachers, their primary social and economic achievements involve producing properly indoctrinated, neo-Marxist meatheads who can't read, write or compute but are brimming with inexplicable self-esteem.
As fun as the teachers unions are, they're bush league, when compared to the pernicious social and economic achievements of unionized, job-for-life, public employees. When it comes memorable social and economic achievements, public employee unions, like the SEIU, are without peer. For example, at every level of government in Mexifornia - city, county, state - one budget-busting item is drowning them in a tidal wave of budgetary red ink. What is it? It's public employee retirement plans. Generous to a fault, these scams allow the union worker to retire at 50 with, at least, 90% of their pay, then return to their job, THE NEXT DAY, at, virtually, the same pay.
From sea to shining sea, public employee unions like the SEIU dictate public policy, using bought and paid for Elected Tormentors, including Prompter Punk himself. They say "jump" and their Elected Tormentor toadies bellow "how high". If those pesky sovereign individuals try to take back their government, the SEIU's purple-shirted thugs goose-step into peaceable public assemblies to shout, and/or beat, the sovereign individuals into compliance.
Don't wait for the FSOP to get warm and fuzzy over the social and economic 'achievements' of unionized teachers and public employees. Any alleged good they do is overwhelmed by their destructive impact on our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Screw them, and the sorry nag they rode in on.
Jealous of the social and economic achievements perpetrated by unionized teachers and public employees, so-called 'civilian' unions made a compelling, annoyingly successful, bid for their piece of the taxpayer funded pie. Did it work? You better believe it, Sparky.
Eager to please, Demoncrats doled out billions via make-work projects funded by the Porkulus Bill, all of which will reward labor unions.
The same Demoncrat horde worked feverishly, to pass the 'card check' bill which would make it much, MUCH, easier for union organizers to intimidate recalcitrant, rogue individuals into 'agreeing' to be unionized.
The auto industry bailout bill handed two of the Big Three automakers to the United Auto Workers Union on a Commie Red, Obamunist platter.
Marching to the beat of organized labor's drummer, the Nanny State has shackled business owning individuals with suffocating restrictions and unrelenting interference. In addition to complying with minium wage - and 'living' wage - laws, business owning individuals must eke out a profit, while the Nanny State second-guesses every staffing decision, then micro-manages the business's benefits package.
Our antipathy to labor unions goes beyond the aforementioned social and economic achievements. That's only half the story. Organized labor's underlying principles are, in the FSOP's considered opinion, diametrically opposed to the individual liberty on which this nation is built.
Under the union's 'collective' bargaining rules of engagement, longevity trumps individual excellence. It doesn't matter if you're the best at your job, your pay raise will be exactly the same as those three slackers who foist off their work on you. If, however you're a relative newbie, you'll always be earning less than those slackers, whose paycheck is based, exclusively, on longevity.
Union rhetoric is infused with anti-capitalist diatribes which denigrate the achiever(s) who rolled fate's dice by going all in on a new business. Instead of saluting the achiever for risking everything he had on his personal version of the American Dream, the union thugs vilify the achiever as an 'exploiter'. Instead of honoring the achiever who made their own job(s) possible, the union thugs do their utmost to bring the achiever down. For example: the biggest, noisiest union thug celebration I've ever witnessed happened after the union's insatiable demands and prolonged strike forced the company they targeted to close its doors, permanently. They were out of a job, but they called it a victory, because an achiever, a capitalist, went down for the count.
Summing it up, labor unions are anti-capitalist, anti-excellence, and anti-individual. Don't hold your breath waiting for us to salute THAT bull crap on Labor Day. Does that mean we won't take some time out from our summer ending festivities to honor America's working men and women? Hardly. The FSOP is ready, willing and eager to honor America's hard-working men and women. BUT, we insist on saluting the right hard-working people, for the right reasons.
On Labor Day, on many other days, we salute that dirt under the fingernails individual who keeps our ride in top working order, without sending us to the poor house. It's a dirty job - especially keeping Hambo's paganmobile functional - but it's accomplished with compelling expertise.
On Labor Day, we salute the food wrangler at our local deli who greets us by name, knows our preferences, and serves us with friendly efficiency.
On Labor Day, we salute the service we get from our web hosting service. We know we're small potatoes on their ledger sheet, but, no matter how busy they are, they take the time to answer our pesky questions and still manage to convince us that they appreciate our business.
On Labor Day, we hoist a brewskie to honor the computer gurus at our internet service provider, who spotted a problem we had with our e-mail, then sent us the answer to our question, before we had time to ask it.
On Labor Day, we honor all the working men and women who understand our, occasional, financial limitations, prompting them to suggest a bang-for-the-buck solution, without making us feel like a charity case.
On Labor Day, we salute the working men and women who keep their outpost of capitalism open for an extra half hour, allowing us to meet our own pressing schedule.
On Labor Day, we take a moment to thank the working men and women who understand the importance of excellent customer service. This, in our estimation, is a major social and economic achievement, since it allows us to reward excellence with our continuing patronage.
On Labor Day, we send a heartfelt shout out to the working men and women who take the time to help us solve our pressing problem with a referral, when their outpost of capitalism doesn't offer the goods and/or services that we need.
What's the difference between these achievements by America's working stiffs and the overblown social and economic achievements attributed to organized labor? The actions the FSOP honors, salutes and venerates are examples of individual excellence. It's the kind of individual pride in one's work, which is sorely lacking in a unionized environment. They're mundane examples of the individual excellence which helped forge the solid foundation on which this once great nation was built.
The Free State of PIG refuses to play killjoy, by ruining your Labor Day. If you still decided to hoist your brewskie to honor organized labor, so be it, but do it with your eyes wide open. If, like us, you choose to salute those real working stiff heroes who make your life a little bit more liveable, one transaction at a time, that's an utterly PIG-worthy idea.
Labor Day still isn't our idea of a good time, and it never will be. On the other hand, if we could create a Capitalism Rocks holiday, that's a whole new ball game.
|
AUGUST 2011
|
Hambo's Quake Take
Source: Hambo's Hammer [08/23/11]
Mexifornia denizens are, understandably smug over of the high anxiety generated by the 5.9 magnitude quake in Virginia, that shook buildings and rattled nerves in Washington D.C. They're quick to point out that, by Mexifornia standards it was a 'moderate' shaker, thus not worth all the fuss.
In a way, the Left Coast smirkers are right, but not entirely. First of all, there's a matter of building codes. In Virginia, the code is not written with quakes in mind. Also, there's the matter of building materials. Unlike Mexifornia, the East has a lot of venerable brick and mortar buildings which don't fare well in an earthquake. If you examine the pictures of the damage from the New Zealand quake, you'll notice a lot of brick and mortar strewn everywhere.
Here in the PIGdom, I viewed the D.C. quake in a much different light. To me, it appeared that Old Ka-Boom has finally had his fill of the Beltway Bozos, so he decided to get in some warm-up shots - the quake - before hit gets serious about that long overdue smiting.
I hear those snickers out there, but your laughter is ill-advised, since PIG's TENURED Professor of Piety, PIGster J, has examined my 'warm-up shot for the smiting' notion and given it his provisional seal of approval. That's right, PIGsters, it appears that, better late than never, the celestial smiting of the Capitol Hill clown posse is now in play.
That's gotta elicit a rousing 'AMEN' from the congregation.
Core Principles
Source: Pagan Scribbler Rant
Like the 'truths' which the Founding Fathers invoked so eloquently, in the Declaration of Independence, there are also - in our PIGish opinion - certain core principles which are, or ought to be, equally 'self-evident'. Am I that full of myself? Perhaps, but in this instance, I'm not full of 'IT'.
We hold the following core principles to be 'self-evident' and therefore essential components of the egregiously maligned American character:
There is no inherent, or Constitutional, right which protects you from being offended.
The coercive power of the Nanny State should not, MUST NOT, 'shield' you from things you don't want to see and/or don't want to hear. If it gives you a boo-boo, that's your personal, individual, problem and is not, never should be, an excuse for a Nanny State intervention.
If it bugs you, grow a pair. If it still bugs you, take your complaint directly to the perpetrator. A sovereign American individual does not run caterwauling to the Nanny State, every time, he, she, heshe, or it gets a boo-boo.
Failure and/or defeat play a vital role in the development of a sovereign individual's character.
Admittedly, the lessons learned from failure and/or defeat are painful ones. But, sooner or later, no matter how many safety nets the Korrectniks and Elected Tormentors build beneath you, your life is going to hit a speed bump. If you learned the proper lessons on the playing field as a tyke, you're going to cope with life's nasty little surprises with minimal difficulty.
On the other hand, if you played on little league teams where no score was kept and no winner declared...if you attended a school which passed everyone, regardless of an individual's scholastic deficiencies, you'll be devastated by life's first speed bump. Nanny State safety nets turn life's regulation prat falls into a shattering crisis.
Failure and defeat are great teachers which, among other things, help an individual, as Dirty Harry said so eloquently "know his limitations". Sovereign American individuals take failure and defeat in stride. After learning the relevant lessons from them, sovereign American individuals pick themselves up, dust themselves off, then, a little bit wiser, they get on with their lives.
Each individual is defined, for good or ill, by his, her, hisher, or its thoughts, words, and deeds.
Your immutable traits - gender, ethnicity and race - are not the be-all, end-all, of who, and what you are. They are, in the grand scheme of things, irrelevant, because they're issued at birth. It's that very irrelevancy which makes them so popular with the Nanny State, which has a pathological aversion to sovereign individualism.
Like it or not, you are defined, as an individual, by what you've said, what you've done, and the thoughts which motivate your words and deeds. You are, like it or not, defined by the VOLITIONAL elements of your life.
Each individual is judged, for good or ill, by his, her, hisher, or its thoughts, words, and deeds.
The One is the poster punk, when it comes to fleeing from taking personal accountability for his own actions. If you can stand to listen to his relentless bloviating, you'll learn that he isn't responsible for any of his own thoughts, words and/or deeds. Bart Simpson's "I didn't do it" sums up The One's attitude, perfectly. He's so terrified by the taint of personal failure that he's equally terrified to take credit for something that seems to be working. What if - GASP - it all goes wrong, down the road?
A sovereign individual accepts the blame for his, her, hisher, or its own mistakes. A sovereign individual also takes full credit for his, her, hisher, or its successes. It's this 'I did good, on this one' element of the American character which thrills the snot out of our international critics, who defame us as 'arrogant'. What the whiners overlook is the fun fact that, after a sovereign individual takes that victory lap, they immediately begin work on the next challenge on their agenda. That, too, is a core element of the American character.
Life is not a zero-sum game.
This is an especially bitter pill for the Nanny State class warriors, who spend every waking hour vilifying, punishing, and impoverishing achievers. In their fevered brains, the success of an American achiever comes 'at the expense of' that 'noble' ward of the Nanny State, the chronically-needy parasite.
Sovereign American individuals understand that the success of one achiever is the fertile, economic, soil which spurs the growth of other achievers. Bill Gates' legendary success at Microsoft spawned whole new industries. The same phenomenon is playing out in the area of telecommunications. Success, does not come at the expense of others. Success does not breed a wave of failure to achieve that 'zero sum'. Success, by its very nature, breeds more success. The Nanny State's role in this process involves staying out of the achievers' way.
Life is inherently unfair, but it is not, inherently unjust.
One of the primary elements in the Nanny State's on-going obsession to "transform America" involves negating - by artificial, Draconian, means - life's inherent unfairness. There's no room in this "transformed America" for life's unequal distribution of skills, aptitudes and intellect. That's why, in their mindless zeal to achieve an equality of results, the Nanny State has thrown out the single, objective standard which presents an identical hurdle for each individual. Instead, the Nanny State's social engineers give 'favored', but otherwise unqualified, individuals a much lower hurdle, while forcing 'undesirable' individuals to surmount an impossibly high barrier.
Sovereign American individuals welcome the challenge to test themselves against life's single, one-size-fits-all, standard. The only thing they want from their Elected Tormentors is a rational government that engenders an environment that maximizes each individual's inalienable liberty, allowing each individual to go as far as their skills, intellect, and hard work will take them.
I don't give a flaming f**k how many times The One spouts this mindless, "transforming American" drivel. I don't give a flaming f**k how often this malignant narcissist assaults my intelligence with his yammering. I will not surrender my sovereign individualism without a fight. I will not jettison the core principles I just set forth. Does that make me another Thomas Jefferson? No, it makes me what Obamunists hate most, that relic from a bygone era, a rugged American individual.
I will do everything in my power to promote the core elements of the American character. I will start by making them part an parcel of my daily life. If The One, and his Rabid Moonbat Marxist horde, have a problem with that, they can BITE ME.
Guest Commentary By Old Frank
OLD FRANK'S TAKE ON RAISING REVENUES
Right on. And to raise taxes is not the same increasing "revenues." Never in the past have tax increases been used to cut the debt (buy back government paper). Rather, they have invariably been used by Congress as new opportunities to spend even more on new and existing programs!! Taxes DON'T increase revenues. Conversely, revenues are always increased when business and commerce takes off – more people working –paying taxes – fewer on unemployment, food stamps, Medicaid, and all the rest of tax and spend rat-holes, and prosperous, confident people BUYING.
So what are the reasons why companies (those entities despised by the Obama bunch that actually MAKE jobs and pay taxes) are sitting on cash rather than investing on new plants, equipment and hiring? Two big reasons stand out – lack of demand (anemic sales, poor consumer confidence) and a plethora of needless and goofy new regulations that make hiring more expensive and risky, combined with threats of increased taxes and tons of new OSHA, EPA, rules and other alphabet soup nonsense. Jobs, jobs, jobs – laser-like focus? What a laugh. For example, at the very time we are in a deep and lengthy recession, with high unemployment and low revenues, the Obama bunch saddled the economy with "green" rules – finding that even the very breath we exhale (carbon dioxide) is 'toxic' to the environment and issuing rulings that increase the costs of the very electricity needed by factories and businesses – and homes – of all sizes. These rules seek to punish existing power production facilities – especially those fired by coal, the very fossil fuel that we are blessed with in greater abundance than any other nation on earth. The Obama bunch also hates petroleum of all kinds and is generally pleased that gas is hovering at the $4 a gallon level – even though this high price adds costs to every single product we manufacture, store, sell, buy and use. And, this focused hatred of all things petroleum has cost hundreds of thousands of high paying (and tax paying ) jobs for those normally engaged in drilling and producing oil products here in the U.S. "Green energy" meanwhile is terribly expensive, unreliable, and environmentally hazardous – and to exploit it further will require additional hundreds of billions to upgrade the power grid to accommodate the periodicity of "green" power (wind & solar).
Oh and for every one of those oil producing jobs that remains on hold, the American people take a twofer hit: not only do we lose the taxes that those employees would pay, we must BORROW money to pay the unemployment benefits, food stamps, Medicaid and so on down the line, for every one of those thousands of workers..
With Obama and a congressional majority, the Democrat crowd had the opportunity to fulfill its long suppressed "wish list" of social experimentation and regulatory rampage at the very time that our nation faced a sclerotic economy. Brilliant, eh? All loved by the like-minded, fellow-travelling, usual suspects in the mainstream media and sold to our malleable neighbors as "hope" and "change."
One final point. While on vacation in Europe earlier this summer, I had the occasion to visit with my grandson a major public hospital, in the capital city. It was a fairly new, very large facility. I couldn't help but notice the shabbiness and dinginess of the floors, walls, furnishings, and even some of the staff. Break, break, Earlier this week, I took my neighbor to our local hospital (five minutes away) and waited with him until they wheeled him away for surgery. The place was (is) spotless, floors that shine, furniture that is comfortable and clean (no holes) and an entire staff that was helpful, cheerful, and professional. The room they had for my neighbor after surgery had the usual bed tray, but on it his towels were artfully entwined in the shape of a beautiful swan, next to the "on-call" order-up menu, and not a speck of dust or finger mark anywhere to be found. All of this care and comfort for a Medicare patient! Obviously what we needed here in the good old USA was a European style healthcare system with dirty floors, delayed surgeries, missing medicines, surly nurses and staff, and so on. "Change we can believe in!" But hey, Paul Krugman, professor and NYT pundit, assures us that our future is the British national healthcare system and that, in his words, …."it works!"
How could (can) so many of us be so dumb?
Old Frank
|
JULY 2011
|
PIG SEZ STFU
Source: Hambo Meltdown
It's coming from all points of the political spectrum and we're fed up with it.
Few days pass without a news report, from somewhere in the world, that shows it's alive, well, and EVERYWHERE.
Enough already!
We've had our fill of whining, whimpering, bitching, blubbering, complaining, and caterwauling.
We've had our fill of alleged humans who think their hypersensitivity gives them the right to dictate what sovereign individuals can say, write, do, read, watch on the boob tube, see in a movie theater, or listen to on the radio.
They can't, or won't, wrap their mind around a non-negotiable element of objective reality: there is no inherent right which prevents you from being offended. No matter how bitter that pill is to swallow, you must cope with the fact that the right not to be offended DOES NOT EXIST.
Since so many of the world's alleged humans aren't paying attention, I'll, once again, give you the non-negotiable facts about your inalienable individual liberty birthright:
* There is no Constitutional "right" that protects you from being offended.
* You don't have the right to criminalize all speech, all images, all activities that you deem inappropriate for your rugrat.
* You don't have the right to silence others because you don't want to hear what they say.
* You don't have the right to stop others from creating and displaying certain images because you don't want to see them. (Are you paying attention, CAIR? Am I coming through loud and clear Donny?)
* You don't have the right to stop consenting adults from engaging in private, consensual, sexual activities because you disapprove of them.
* You don't have the right to invoke the government's monopoly on the use of force to coerce other individuals to surrender their inalienable right to their own life, their own liberty or the pursuit of their own happiness.
* You do not have the right to use coercive Nanny State power to force them to adhere to your narrow, puritanical, view of propriety.
Inalienable individual liberty in general, and free speech in particular, is a real pisser. It's an unrelenting thrill ride during which all concepts - including your sacred cows - are tested, molested and denigrated. The ensuing free exchange of ideas - all ideas...sacred to profane and everything in between - is an equal opportunity offender, especially for certain notoriously thin-skinned individuals. Like it or not, it's part and parcel of inalienable individual liberty.
Blah, blah, blah. I'm putting myself to sleep with this abstract bull crap. It's time to kick it up several notches and deal with some specifics:
If you're an Atheist in the Freedom From Religion Foundation who got a painful boo-boo over the USPS' new Mother Theresa stamp, that's your personal problem. I don't give a damn how much it offends you, banning it to 'make it all better' isn't an option. Just close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, hum REAL LOUD, and GET OVER IT.
If you're a stoned on Old Ka-Boom supernaturalist who goes postal because a Mexifornia landmark, Mt. Diablo, is named after the Devil, that's your personal problem. I don't give a damn how much it offends you, forcing a name change on rational adults who like 'Mt. Diablo' is not an option. Just close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, hum REAL LOUD, and GET OVER IT.
If you're a 'ginger' who lives down under and got a boo-boo over an Aussie zoo's advert about 'rangas' (Aussie speak for orangutans AND slang for red-heads), that's your personal problem. I don't give a damn how much it offends you, making them pull the advert is not an option. If 'ranga' is too much to bear, just close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, hum REAL LOUD, and GET OVER IT.
If you're so pathetic that a brief glimpse of Janet Jackson's coco-colored hooter during a Super Bowl broadcast makes you queasy, that's your personal problem. I don't give a damn how much it offends you, using it as an excuse to dictate what I can watch is not an option. If peek-a-boob makes you catatonic, just close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, hum REAL LOUD, and GET OVER IT.
If you're a hard core, pro-abortion advocate who has a hair-incinerating meltdown over Pam Tebow's forthcoming - I'm glad I took the serious, personal, medical risk to have my Heisman Trophy-winning son, Tim, instead of getting an abortion - Super Bowl advert, that's your personal problem. I don't give a damn how much you don't want to hear it, coercing CBS into nuking it, is not an option. If this no shit, life or death drama knots your knickers, just close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, hum REAL LOUD, and GET OVER IT.
If you detect hidden - from any rational adult - GLAAD BAAG imagery in a character on a lame kiddie program, Teletubbies, that's your personal problem. I don't give a damn how much it offends you, trying to have it banned from the tube is not an option. If you're too stressed to handle it, just close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, hum REAL LOUD, and GET OVER IT.
If you're a slacker who gets huffy over job adverts which ask for applicants who are 'reliable' and 'hard working', that's your personal problem. I don't give a damn how much it offends you, demanding that the Nanny State slap a 'discriminatory' label on it is not an option. It's time to do what you gotta do: cower in mom's basement, close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, hum REAL LOUD, and GET OVER IT.
If you're a properly pious pinhead who has a memorable meltdown, when you encounter a bikini or lingerie clad wench at your local coffee kiosk, that's your personal problem. I don't give a dam how much it offends you, dictating a coffee barista's dress code is not an option. If you can't handle a coffee wrangler's dangerous curves, just close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, hum REAL LOUD, and GET OVER IT.
If you're a gutless wonder who has a hyperventilating hissy fit over shock jocks whose standard fare is Frat Boy prattle and locker room humor, that's your personal problem. I don't give a damn how much it offends you, using the Nanny State's monopoly on the use of force to drive them off the airwaves is not an option. If you can't handle it, and you're too technologically challenged to change the station, just close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, hum REAL LOUD, and GET OVER IT.
If you're a Morality Nazi who is outraged that the Merriam Webster dictionary in Moonbeam's or Testeronny's classroom defines "oral sex" as "oral stimulation of the genitals", that's your personal problem. I don't give a damn how much it offends you, having an essential learning tool like a dictionary pulled from the classroom is not an option. If you can't handle the fun fact that your precious snowflakes discussed this topic, in much more graphic terms, on the playground, just close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, hum REAL LOUD, and GET OVER IT.
If you're a Colonista who thinks it's racist, when an American proudly declares that the USA has one flag, and one language, that's your personal problem. I don't give a damn how much it offends you, replacing the Stars & Stripes with another flag and/or replacing English as the language of this land, is not an option. If you don't like it, then slither back to that beloved blight on the globe where you can GET OVER IT, under the flag of your choice, in any language that thrills you spitless.
Admittedly, our preferred solution - just close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, hum REAL LOUD, and GET OVER IT - has its limitations. There are some cases where a more drastic solution, one specifically tailored for a given situation, is required.
For example, what about certain alleged humans who have turned being chronically offended into their life's work? In some cases - those paragons of tolerance who make 'the Arab street' so thrilling - the answer is simple. Since these liberty phobic Islamikazes are perpetually offended, the solution is obvious. Fit them all out in their finest homicide bomber explosive vest, entice the entire insane Islamikaze mob into those precious Arab streets, then blow them to the hell they deserve, simultaneously. No closed eyes needed. No fingers in the ears. No loud humming. LOTS OF GETTING OVER IT.
There are, I'm compelled to admit, other charter members of the professionally offended, for whom there is no cure. Why isn't there a cure? Because for them, being chronically offended is their profession. I refer to Ethnocrats who make a nifty living from being offended: Je$$e, Al Sharpton, Calypso Louie, and others of that ilk. I also refer to Morality Nazis who have carved out a lucrative market niche while being offended, on behalf of the children and/or 'for the Lord'. For all of them 'getting over it' is not an option, so it's time to bring out the FSOP's heavy artillery: STFU, asshole...Don't make us come over there.
You have the right to be a chronically offended, caterwauling piece of crap. It's no skin off my nose. You do NOT have the right to force me to change MY life, because my choices as a sovereign individual are 'offensive' to a hypersensive asshat like you. If you can't wrap your mind around that, I'll simplify it for you: sit down, STFU, and GET OVER IT.
Debt Ceiling 101
At least two years ago (that's the last time the U.S. Senate passed a budget bill) the Congressional Clown posse, intentionally, passed a budget which allocates a LOT more spending than We the People can afford. It works like this: if, for example, tax receipts would only cover 60% of the spending plan they enacted, the remaining 40% would need to be borrowed. Unfortunately, deficit spending is alive and well.
Borrowing the remaining funds isn't rocket science, but there's a problem: the debt ceiling.
The debt ceiling is a Nanny State imposed limit on how much red ink they can generate. It's the functional equivalent of the limit on your credit card, with one difference. You can't raise your own credit card limit, but Uncle Sam can.
Uncle Sam claims he needs to raise his debt ceiling to cover the spending he authorized. I get that, but I'm not convinced that it is the only, or the best, choice.
Instead of giving himself the right to add more red ink to the national debt, why doesn't Uncle Sam revisit the spending he authorized, and reduce it, by any means necessary, to match his 'revenue'? That's the choice we would need to make, if we maxed out our credit card. Our Elected Tormentors refuse to go there, and their reasoning is painfully clear. The money they're squandering is ours, not theirs. Furthermore, when Hell freezes over and they decide to pay down the debt, the money won't come out of their pockets, it will come out of OURS.
Don't be fooled by all this 'spending cut' hot air. It's not what you think. To a rational adult a spending cut means you will spend less money, in real dollars, than you spent last year, last month, or last week. To an Elected Tormentor, a 'spending cut' is a reduction - usually a very small one - in a planned spending INCREASE. For example, if Uncle Sam planned to increase his annual spending by 25%, before a spending cut, a 'Draconian spending cut' might mean Uncle Sam would need to settle for a 20% increase in annual spending.
To me spending 20% more than you did the prior budget cycle is a spending INCREASE. Only in the reality insulated region of the Twilight Zone where Elected Tormentors do their dirty work is this a spending CUT.
As you can see, nothing is exactly what it seems to be, when it comes to Nanny State spending. If you think that misconception is accidental, you're delusional.
The inconvenient truth We the People need to face is this: the people elected to represent us are spend-a-holic asshats who can't be trusted with OUR money. That's another reason We the People need to pink slip every damn one of them.
Guest Commentary
Source: Our E-Mail Inbox
[This one is take it or leave it. Are these Ted's own words? Don't know. Don't care. Whoever wrote it, NAILED IT. It's well worth reading.]
YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN STUPID
by Ted Nugent
You have the right to remain stupid, and what you say and do can and will be used against you in the court of public opinion. Unfortunately, the court of public opinion is expanding into a stupid is as stupid does joke. And they have a president and gang of thieves in the United States government to represent them.
So goes the sheeping of America. Welcome to Euro II.
With the level of dishonesty, fraud, abuse of power, corruption, rampant irresponsible and downright criminal behavior and their vehement refusal to be accountable, our government has clearly lost its collective mind, and its soul.
The brain dead, zombie like nonsenses blurting out of democrats' pie holes is mind boggling as they feebly attempt to rationalize raising the debt ceiling, scrambling mindlessly to explain how increased runaway, criminal spending on gluttonous, wasteful, superfluous crap is a good thing.
"Honey, we're in debt up to our ass, let's go shopping and increase our gluttonous indulgences. Yeah, that's the stuff."
Is there a Dr. Phil or an Oprah to counsel psychotic bureaucrats? Somebody has to put a halt to this insanity as quickly as possible. We the people of the Tea Party are trying with all our might, but there must be somebody in government that can stop this. Somebody?
The separation of Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches of government have turned into one big gang of complicit goons, scratching each other's backs and scheming to increase their own dishonest teaming up on we the people. Oh how they have forgotten their oath to the US Constitution. Oh woe are they.
A nasty unclean gaggle of Americans read the nonstop reports of mass graves in Mexico, the mountains of dead bodies, the unending exhuming of slaughtered innocents and decapitated citizens and public officials at the hands of evil drug cartels, then nonchalantly purchase another load of the mind and life destroying dope that these subhuman heathens pedal. You have to be on dope in order to fail to admit how your illegal or "medical marijuana" consumption creates wanton death and mayhem in your own communities and country. Thanks for nothing idiots.
Freddie and Fanny and their complicit gang of America hating snake oil salesmen represent the most clear and present economic raping and pillaging in our country's history, and instead of ending the tragedy, the perpetrators are given bonuses and hired by our already criminal infested government. And they call it "creating jobs". Mao and Al Capone would be proud.
In the American West where actual inhabitants have been raising hell for twenty plus years how grizzly bears pose a serious and constant threat to people's lives and livelihood, inept, ignorant bureaucrats force dangerous policy by calling these overpopulated bears an endangered species. A hiker gets killed by a grizzly again and these geniuses' response is to remind people to whistle and bang on pots and pans.
In the middle of a war on terror, invaders invade our southern border with impunity, and instead of living up to their oath to protect America, soulless Fedzillacrats erect signs on American soil, not warning the invaders to leave, but rather warning American citizens to stay out of the invaded territory. Meanwhile, the feds sue Arizona for enforcing American laws.
Charlie Rangle, Tim Guitner, Tom Daschle and God knows how many other criminal tax cheats get caught red handed and none of them are brought to anything resembling justice. Are you kidding me?
Chicago Mayor Daley and now Rhom Emanual, along with NYC mayor Bloomberg, forbid their subjects to protect themselves, but charge their subjects increased taxes for their own heavily armed security detail.
Texas rightly decide to execute a convicted murderer rapist of an innocent little girl, and the president and secretary of state sides with the murderous, rotten to the core UN goons instead of with their own country. Are you kidding me?
I end up in a state of the art emergency room at a Canadian hospital with a serious blood gushing dog bite and wait six and a half hours to see a doctor. In Waco, Texas, I wait less than a minute. Our fearless community organizer in chief wants to fundamentally transform American healthcare into Canadian healthcare. Unless of course you qualify for a crony, payoff waiver of this diabolical scam otherwise shoved down the throats of we the people. Are you kidding me?
Food stamp pigs increase their fraud and criminal abuse of an already proven failed welfare slavery system, and our numbnut politicians let Obama increase it four fold. Are you kidding me?
Cloward and Piven write the ultimate America hating guideline on how to bring down the greatest quality of life in the history of mankind, and the Obama administration puts their ideas on the fast track in broad daylight, yet no one stops him. Are you kidding me?
Four so called Supreme Court Justices declare American citizens have no fundamental right to self-defense, and nobody makes a peep. Are you kidding me?
Unions continue to demand more compensation for less productivity or quality control. The list of jobs Americans are not willing to do gets longer by the day as soilent green foreigners continue to kick our ass because they don't allow such a list. Are you kidding me?
With another glaring smoke and mirrors defiance of their pledge to government transparency, the number one cop in America, aided and abetted by the vehemently anti-gun president, knowingly break the law and their oath to the US Constitution by running illegally begotten guns to Mexican murderers, then try to blame legitimate American gun dealers. Nothing like a good backfire to spotlight the cockroaches.
I could go on, but I'm getting sick to my stomach. As are an increasing number of American citizens sickened by the flagrant criminality of our government. I would like to go on record, that the US Government is now more offensive and in violation of self-evident truths and God given individual rights and liberties than the British government was in 1775. Make note bureaucrats- we have had enough, are completely fed up with the insanity, and we officially put you on notice; you're fired. When we go to the polls in 2012, we are committed to give most of you a good dose of what unemployment feels like. And from now on, you will have to create your own jobs, because governments, especially a bloated, criminally abusive government like we have in the USA today, is unforgivable, unsustainable and will not be tolerated any longer.
I would highly recommend you all seek treatment for your allergies to logic, truth, goodwill, decency, accountability and The American Way. Because if you don't get help soon, God only knows what will become of you.
A Suffocating Stench of Injustice
Source: Hambo's Hammer
In light of the verdicts in the Casey Anthony trial, today, I understand why lady justice wears a blindfold. I don't blame her for not wanting to watch what is done in her name. The question uppermost in my mind is why - given the stench rising from the rotting corpse of our so called justice system - she isn't holding her nose, instead of the now obsolete scales of justice?
I don't need to be chloroformed, duct taped, then dumped in a swamp to rot, to see the implications of this decision and those from assorted other high profile trials. What we mere mortals view as unpardonable crimes, enlightened jurors view in a different light. It happens after they are led to the promised land of Korrectness, where the only unforgivable crimes are being successful, self reliant, and that most reviled entity, a sovereign individual. For most other 'victims of society', there's a guilt absolving excuse:
Michael Jackson's perverted passion for young boys wasn't his fault. He couldn't help himself because his daddy was, and still is, a rat bastard. Rational adults couldn't hear his 'cry for help' but that Southern Mexifornia jury did.
O. J. Simpson's murderous rampage wasn't his fault. He couldn't help himself, because whitey had oppressed him into acting out against institutionalized racism. Rational adults couldn't hear his pleas for 'racial justice', but those morons on that L.A. jury could.
Casey Anthony, through neglect, stupidity, or malice, played a leading role in rendering her daughter room temperature then left her mortal remains to rot in a swamp, but it wasn't her fault. It wasn't her fault when she didn't even report Caylee's 'disappearance' for at least a month. It wasn't her fault when she partied while her daughter's body decomposed. It wasn't her fault when she lied, repeatedly, to everyone, including the police. None of it was her fault, because her daddy had sexually abused her. Rational adults couldn't hear the cries of the damaged child inside Casey, but 12 Florida fatheads did.
The 'visionary' jurors who rendered these verdicts have a tenuous connection to objective reality which enables them to hear these, and many other, disembodied voices. Curiously, by tuning in to the voices in their head, the jurors can't hear the cries for justice coming from Nicole Simpson, Ron Goldman, and Caylee Anthony. It's this special kind of hearing acuity which guarantees that 'victims' like O. J., Mikey, and Casey are no longer answerable to the laws that govern the rest of us...their oppressors...rational, adult, individuals.
When I look at a miscarriage of justice, like the one I just witnessed in Flori-DUH, I envy Lady Justice. I understand the blindfold, too, too, well. I'd understand even more, if she wore earplugs, and held her nose to block out the sickening stench of 'visionary' juror stupidity.
Caylee Anthony deserves justice. She didn't get it in that Florida courtroom. Maybe she'll get it in heaven, when her cries for justice motivate Old Ka-Boom to warm up his celestial smiter.
Parting shot: The bitch got away with it. Now, it's time for her to ca$h in and get rich for her role in the death of her rug rat daughter. Crime doesn't pay? Maybe, back in the day, but it's a slam dunk that the same kind of myopic asshole that voted 'Not Guilty' will reward this Anthony bitch. They'll be the first ones to buy her book, and the first ones to patronize the movie of HER valiant struggle against a justice system which just didn't understand how that 'the little brat was cramping my style'.
Caylee Anthony is dead, and this bitch is laughing all the way to the bank.
Caylee Anthony is dead, and, as far as I can tell, there isn't a single member of the Anthony family who gives a rat's ass.
Caylee Anthony is dead, and the shysters who got her mommy off the hook are dancing on the little girl's grave.
Caylee Anthony is dead and nobody will ever be held accountable for her untimely demise.
At times like this, objective reality really pisses me off.
Giving The Founding Fathers Props
Source: Top Story Archive
Since I declared July Founding Fathers Month, I decided to re-post this venerable rant. Why? Because I can, and because I thought it necessary to give PIGish props to the visionary men who created this once great nation which The One, and his Marxist cohorts are hell bent on destroying.]
FOUNDING FATHERS, n.
The epitome of Political Incorrectness, they were visionary nation builders who created a new kind of nation which elevated inalienable individual liberty to its rightful place - beyond the suffocated grasp of the Nanny State.
It's popular to lionize and/or denigrate those legendary individuals whom we call 'the Founding Fathers'. They deserve to be honored for what they accomplished. However, they were merely mortal men with the same combination of virtues and vices that are the hallmark of being human. They weren't perfection personified, but they managed to rise above themselves to create something that has, so far, stood the test of time.
I'm willing to be so bold as to call these Founding Fathers "PIGsters" because they were, like you and I, fed up with a bloated Nanny State that swung wildly between ignoring the colonies and trying to suffocate their liberty with brute force. They were tired of a Nanny State that perpetrated such assaults on their liberty as the Townsend Acts and the Intolerable Acts which were enacted without their participation and used to bend the American colonists to the Nanny State's will. They were tired of being subjected to, subjugated by, that distant Nanny State's monopoly on the use of force. They were fed up with the Nanny State's relentless assault on their liberty. Eventually, these Founding Father PIGsters decided to do something about an utterly unacceptable situation.
After a false start under the Articles of Confederation which did little more than spread chaos, these exceptional men created something that came thisclose to perfection: the United States of America. They created a nation of, by and for those rugged individuals who had sought out the opportunity that the new world offered. They built the kind of nation that gave these rugged, utterly American, individuals the opportunity to see how far their own talents, intellect and energy could take them without the Nanny State breathing down their neck.
These visionary nation builders crafted a constitution that elevated inalienable individual liberty to its rightful place - beyond the suffocated grasp of the Nanny State. Deliberately, explicitly, they wrote a constitution that strictly limited to power of the Nanny State to intrude upon the inalienable individual liberty of those rugged, sovereign individuals known as Americans. They build a new nation wherein the national government was a small isolated island surrounded by an ocean of inalienable individual liberty. They forged a new kind of government that knew its place and didn't interfere with a sovereign individual's life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
These Founding Fathers - PIGsters all - gave Americans all the necessary tools to create a new kind of nation, one where the government knew its rightful place. It wasn't perfect but it was close enough and it should have worked.
What the hell went so wrong that we got trapped in this shadow of its founding glory America? How did we stray so far from that founding vision to a Great American Nanny State that has turned the tables on sovereign individuals? In this opening decade of the 21st century, that small island of government surrounded by an ocean of inalienable individual liberty has been transformed. Today that small, constantly shrinking, island is what remains of our inalienable individual liberty and the ocean that surrounds it is a ravenous Nanny State that wants to swallow the last shred of our freedom.
The America that allowed rugged, hard-working individuals to achieve their dream and enjoy the fruits of their labor, is gone. In its place we have a Nanny State that punishes those hard-working achievers by stealing the fruits of their labors and giving it away to the clamoring army of parasites. Hard work and self reliance are in disrepute and in their place "NEED" reigns supreme.
Instead of getting out of the way and letting each sovereign individual carve out his piece of the American dream, we have a Nanny State that pays farmers not to grow crops and intrudes on the marketplace with 'price supports'. We have a Nanny State that micro-manages a business owner's ability to hire, fire, set working conditions for and determine the proper pay for his, her, hisher or its employees.
The Founding Fathers' America, where our government knew its place, is a distant memory. Today, the Elected Tormentors give themselves more power with each passing day and do their utmost to enslave America's besieged rugged individuals.
We've strayed so far from that Founding Father's America that even VRWC clowns who give lip service to inalienable individual liberty get it wrong. They begin from the false premise that the U.S. Constitution explicitly defines our liberty. When it comes to inalienable liberty their question is back-asswards. They ask "Where in the constitution does it give an individual the right to ____?". The proper question - the liberty-minded question - is "Where does the constitution give the Nanny State the power to intrude on that inalienable liberty?"
The nation that our Founding Fathers created has, in short, become remarkably similar to the Nanny State that provoked our Founding Fathers in the first place. The Great American Nanny State is as willing to trample our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness as King George and his minions. The Great American Nanny State is as eager to bend us to its will as the Brits were 'back in the day'. Intolerable Acts? Let me name a few: Affirmative Action, Americans With Disabilities Act, Campaign Finance Reform, Socialist Security, the FCC, Department of Education, FDA, EPA, eminent domain, Hate Crime Laws, Smoking Bans, the Death Tax, social engineering through Draconian tax policies, plus the Border Jumping Scumbag coddling bills of 1965 and 1986. That's just a few of the intolerable acts that would have our Founding Fathers updating the Declaration of Independence.
Our Founding Fathers created the first nation in which a sovereign individual's inalienable rights reign supreme. It's time for each and every sovereign American individual to rededicate himself to this uniquely American principle.
It's time to return to inalienable individual liberty and it's corollary individual accountability.
It's time for each and every sovereign American individual to demand that our Elected Tormentors get back to basics.
It's time for each and every sovereign American individual to demand the restoration of America's founding principles.
This week, we honor those Founding Fathers for their willingness to defy the most powerful nation in the world and give its reigning monarch the finger. We need to seize this opportunity and take a moment to ponder how far America has strayed from the path of sovereign individualism and inalienable individual liberty. We need to take stock of ourselves and start looking for a road back to the Founding Fathers' vision of America. We've lost something essential to our liberty and I, for one, want it back.
At this very moment, our men and women in uniform are risking, sacrificing, their lives to defend our liberty. The least we can do is make damn sure that the liberty they are defending is worthy of their efforts, their courage, and their sacrifice. It's time for us to mount an equally courageous, equally determined, fight to restore our nation's liberty here on the home front.
The Founding Fathers are, regrettably, long gone and they're never coming back. But, we can borrow a page from their playbook and seize the moment in the same politically incorrect spirit. We can tell the newest incarnation of King Barry 'The Red', and the clowns on Capitol Hill, to restore a properly Constitutional government, or else. We can demand that our Elected Tormentors get back to the limited functions defined by our Founding Fathers.
If all else fails, we can find a 21st century Thomas Jefferson and get him started on that 21st century Declaration of Independence. There is nothing wrong with the Founding Fathers' original concept; it's the long term execution that got us where we are.
If at first, you don't succeed.
|
JUNE 2011
|
Hambo's Primer on The American Dream
With Elected Tormentors, from both political clans turning 'it' into the American Nightmare, , I decided to dust off this rant about 'it'- A.K.A. the American Dream.
The American Dream means different things to different people. In fact, by its very nature, the American Dream is, of necessity, defined by the dreamer. Each of us has his, her, hisher or its own dream, a dream that can't be...must never be...dictated by some outside entity. I can't tell you what to 'dream'. The Nanny State can't tell you what to dream. That pernicious pest 'the majority' can't tell you what to dream. Your preferred flavor of supernaturalism can't tell you what to dream. It's your American Dream, Sparky, and you're the one who must define it for yourself.
The essence of the American Dream is the unbridled liberty to make your own choices, set your own goals, and define your own criteria for 'success'. The American Dream gives you the freedom to conduct your life and exercise your liberty as you pursue your happiness. The American Dream is a highly personal thing and that's why it is derided as 'selfish'. Of course it's selfish and who said that being selfish is, invariably a bad thing? Like it or not, altruistic Sparky, a rational self interest is an inherently human trait. The American Dream is built upon this fact of existence.
In a larger sense, the American Dream involves creating a political and social environment wherein a sovereign individual has the inherent right to determine the course of his, her, hisher or its life, unimpeded by outside forces. The American Dream is, to borrow a familiar phrase, the freedom "to be all that you can be". But, it's more than that. The American Dream doesn't demand that you reach for the stars when you determine the course of your life. The American Dream is the freedom to become as MUCH, or as LITTLE as you want.
For some, an American Dream might be an utterly altruistic life that seeks to make the world a better place by helping others. For others, it might mean banding together with like minded sovereign individuals to create something meaningful to each of you (a new invention, a product, an outpost of capitalism, or simply a book). For certain rugged American individuals, the American Dream means striving to test your limits in some specific endeavor. Your dream could be as simple as being the first member of your family to get a college degree. Maybe your dream is to get married, buy a home and raise a family. The nature and scope of your personal American Dream is only limited by your imagination.
The essential point about the American dream is that, by the nature of your inalienable individual birthright, it's your call. It's up to you to determine how to utilize your inalienable right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. You are free to make this monumental, life-defining choice, without the permission of the Nanny State, the tyrannical majority, or some flavor of supernaturalism. The Nanny State, the 'majority' and the true believers need to butt out because nobody asked them to make this call. In this land conceived in liberty, the momentous decision to define your personal version of the American Dream is all yours. You can dream as big and as grand as you want, but how well you do is dictated by the amount of energy, talent and intellect you have at your disposal.
The American Dream involves giving an individual the liberty to make his own choices about the course his life will take. But, since it's your personal choice, your individual American Dream, it comes with certain baggage. In your pursuit of your American Dream, you must be free from outside coercion. By the same token, the American Dream does not allow you to coerce others into handing you that American Dream on a silver platter. You are free to enlist others who choose to join your quest, but you can't force them into it. The dark underbelly of the American Dream is that it's your intellect, your energy, and your talent that seal the deal. If you expect to reap the rewards when you realize that American Dream, you need to do the heavy lifting.
There's one more thing you need to know, need to accept, about the American Dream. No matter how you define your American Dream, you're going to be second-guessed, criticized, and, in some cases, vilified. Depending on the nature of your dream, you'll be impugned as "selfish", "materialistic", "hedonistic", "arrogant", and of course "doomed to failure". You'll need to develop a tough hide if you expect to see your personal version of the American Dream all the way to that finish line. You must learn to ignore the naysayers, the critics and the parasites who can't wait to steal a piece of your success. Nothing worth having comes easy, Sparky.
There have always been barriers, traps and unexpected consequences lurking between an American and his dream. Back in the day, many of the barriers were dictated by an untamed environment and the prevailing level of technology. In the 21st century, the Nanny State shoves its greedy mitt into your pocket at regular intervals. If, by sheer force of willpower and talent, you achieve your dream, the Nanny State will do its level best to crush you with bureaucracy, regulations, taxes, intrusive laws and assorted other obscenities. Does that mean the American Dream isn't worth the effort? Nobody can make that call but you, Sparky. If you've got the right stuff, you'll shrug off the Nanny State nitwits, the naysayers and all the other pests who want to keep you from achieving that dream.
The bottom line about the American Dream is this: success is not guaranteed and there are more barriers in your way than you want, need or deserve. All this land conceived in liberty gives you is the opportunity. But, when you cross that finish line and achieve that American Dream, you are entitled to gloat and mete out the relevant 'neener, neener, neener'. Once you're done with that, don't rest on your laurels. Set a new goal, and start striving for that next American Dream, because there's no limit on how many American Dreams you can have in your lifetime.
Are we all up to speed on the American Dream now, Sparky?
Suffocating Invention & Inspiration
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts [06/19/11]
Western Culture is, according to the Jihadikazes and those unrepentant cultural Marxists in academia, the source of all that is evil with the world. The list of Western Culture's alleged sins includes everything from the untimely demise of noble New World cultures that perpetrated such delightful things as cannibalism and human sacrifice to Global Warming. Blah, blah, blah.
Curiously, Western Culture, with all its glorious contributions to human knowledge, has also invented the means if its own demise: The Nanny State. If the Nanny State existed 'back in the day', the world would be a much different place:
Thomas Edison - his many essential inventions - would be doomed before he began by an alphabet soup of pettifogging bureaucratic pinheads that would quickly snuff out any shred of creativity.
Lewis and Clark would give up before they began their epic journey, the instant the EPA's mandatory environmental impact report bull crap reached critical mass.
Henry Ford's revolutionary contribution to mass production, the moving assembly line, would never get started, due to a deluge of OSHA complaints.
The Erie Canal, a stunning feat of engineering, would be shut down by a tree hugger lawsuit that would thwart 'progress' to save the only breeding population of the turd-shaped butt lizard.
Charles Lindbergh would never pass all those mandatory Nanny State safety regulations, so his plane would run out of fuel idling on the runway
Do you really think the Nanny State would allow the Wright Brothers to build, fly and promote a contraption that dangerous?
Would the NO NAD's who have the Nanny State by the short and curly follicles let Thomas Jefferson get away with something as egregiously sexist as "All men are created equal"?
Would Columbus still have his zeal for discovery after the Nanny State's diversity bonkers bureaucrats got done making sure that his crew was properly diverse and his craft was suitably outfitted with wheelchair ramps and other disability-friendly refinements?
We are who - and what - we are because a lot of rugged individuals defied conventional wisdom and, in many cases, staked their very lives on an 'insane' idea. Those days, sadly, are over because the Nanny State drives a stake through the beating heart of the inherently human impulse to ask "what if".
The Nanny State is a menace that, deliberately suffocates 'risk', but the price is very high since they, invariably, confiscate the ensuing rewards. Western Culture is being throttled by an out of control bureaucracy. The timeless challenge of "that can't be done" which drove so many visionary individuals to inspiring feats has been transformed by the Nanny State's "you can't do that because we won't let you".
As long as we tolerate the continuation of the Nanny State, we are our own worst enemy.
Have We the People Lost Sight Of The Big Picture?
Source: Hambo's Hammer [06/07/11]
It doesn't matter which part of this once great nation you call home, sooner or later, the realization will hit you right between the eyes. The timing and strength of that painful reality check depends, in large part, on how closely you follow the news of the day. Depending on your ability to filter out unpleasant elements of objective reality, you might avoid that painful moment of clarity for a long time. Eventually, even if you're willfully myopic, you'll feel the blinders fall away and that's when it will hit you.
This isn't My America.
At first glance, it looks familiar. The names of the streets, cities, counties and states seem correct. All the landmarks look familiar. On the surface, it looks like MY America, but the facade breaks down when I take closer look. The more I look around, the more convinced I am, that I'm not where I belong.
Every day, the local fishwrap gives me more proof that I'm not in the right place. The News Nitwits bombard me with reports that are utterly alien to that legendary land conceived in liberty. Is this a parallel reality? Am I in the Twilight Zone? Am I trapped in a nightmare? It could be any one of them. It could be something else. I do know one thing about this place.
This isn't MY America.
In Ancient Rome, Nero fiddled while Rome burned. This faux America has a Messianic leader who plays golf while the nation he was elected to lead sinks beneath an ocean of red ink.
This isn't MY America.
In Texas and Arizona, wild fires burn out of control. When Texas asked for fire-fighting assistance from Uncle Sam, the Obama Regime looked at the electoral map, then performed the requisite calculation: Texas = Red State = send the fire fighting assistance requested by Texas to Mexico, instead. Federal disaster support is denied when your state is the WRONG color on the Red Shed's political map?
This isn't MY America.
In government cess-schools from sea to shining sea, grade school age inmates are indoctrinated to adopt a North Korean style devotion (obeisance) to America's 'Dear Leader', by Obamunist Educrats. Grade school tykes sing HYMNS of praise to a Marxist God named Obama?
This isn't MY America.
An Arkansas middle school wore its political colors - Commie Red - on its sleeve, in the school year book. Proving that indoctrination, not education, was their stock in trade, the Educrats included a 'worst people in history list which excluded Stalin, Mao, Ghenghis Khan, and Ivan the Terrible, but found room for George W. Bush and Dick "Darth" Cheney in the top five. Marxist Moonbat indoctrination at an Arkansas middle school?
This isn't MY America.
Our warriors on the front line in our war against Jihadikazes are ordered to interrupt their combat missions because they must attend sensitivity training. Sensitivity training on the front lines of a war? A politically correct war where 'style' supercedes 'substance'?
This isn't MY America.
The Pentagon has implemented a program which, in essence, makes race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation the paramount consideration, when it comes to promotions. To put it bluntly, in 2011, the following individuals would be automatically disqualified from consideration, because they are TOO WHITE: George Washington, Nathaniel Greene, Daniel Morgan, John Paul Jones, Andrew Jackson, Robert E. Lee, Ulysses S. Grant, Stonewall Jackson, David Farragut, William Sherman, John Pershing, Dwight Eisenhower, Lewis B "Chesty" Puller, George Patton, Chester Nimitz, Douglas MacArthur, Matthew Ridgeway, Creighton Abrams, and Norman Schwarzkopf. Politically correct promotions in our armed forces?
This isn't MY America.
At airports throughout this Faux America, a gang of federal terrorists - the TSA - brazenly violates the 4th Amendment of the Constitution, by physically assaulting law-abiding air travelers, while deliberately ignoring the air travelers most likely to be a Jihadikaze. A government entity which deliberately roughs up, intimidates, law abiding individuals?
This isn't MY America.
The usual suspects give lip service to Freedom of Speech, especially around July 4th, but their words ring hollow. In this faux America, Freedom of Speech is attacks by groups with an agenda. Islamikazes muzzle speech that they don't like with threats of violence. Recognized victim group criminalize certain thoughts, with a vile concept called 'hate speech'. Invoking a mythical right which protects them from being offended, hypersensitive cretins from all points of the political spectrum use the coercive power of the Nanny State to muzzle 'offending' speech. During the critical phases of any Election Cycle, wide swaths of speech are muzzled by campaign finance laws whose only purpose is to assure the re-election of incumbents. Intimidation, thought crimes, a right not to be offended, incumbent protecting speech restrictions?
This isn't MY America.
A television show proclaimed "the truth is out there". It's out there, but you won't find it in a fishwrap, or on a newscast. In this faux America 'who, what, when, where, why' are long gone and so is any pretense at objectivity. Instead, you have alleged journalists who are, in fact, propagandists for the Demoncrat Party and/or publicists for The One. One-sided commentary masquerading as 'the truth'?
This isn't MY America.
I tried, without success, to chalk this up to my inherent pessimism. The idea is still in play, but only as a contributing factor. Why the change? I keep hearing other sovereign individuals verbalizing the same conclusion.
"America has changed. It's not the country I know and love."
"I don't recognize America anymore. Nothing is the way it should be."
"This isn't America anymore. It's all changed...all wrong."
"This isn't MY America anymore."
MY America wasn't perfect, but it was loaded with potenial to become Reagan's 'shining city on the hill', if We the People got serious about making things right.
Maybe it's time to put MY America on a milk carton. Maybe it's time to put everyone on alert, telling them: If you spot MY America roaming around aimlessly, please grab it by the arm and tell it to phone home.
Whatever happened to that place called 'America'?
Source: Hambo's Archives
Given the direction our nation is headed, I feel like we've lost some vital part of what makes us who, what, we are. For the lack of a better word, I call it 'America', in this piece from my personal archives. This rant only identifies what we've lost.
In my current state of mind, I won't even pretend to tell how we'll ever get it back. We are, I'm afraid, in the 'things have got to get a lot worse' phase of an eventual, albeit a long way off, return to what we once were, that shining city on the hill.
I can tell you one thing, that's etched in stone. There's no room for that place called America in the brave new world that's being imposed on us by George Soros and his shill, a Marxist Messiah named Barack Hussein Obama.
America was a nation that one of its presidents called a 'shining city on a hill', a nation that showed the world what sovereign individuals working together, voluntarily, could accomplish.
It was a marvelous place that encouraged an individual to strive to achieve the maximum degree of success.
It was a land conceived in liberty where each individual was afforded the opportunity to go as high and as far as his talents, energy. and intelligence would take him.
It was a nation where an individual's great achievement and success were celebrated and cited as an example of what could be accomplished when a person focused all their energy, intellect and talent on a single goal.
It was a land where inalienable individual liberty reigned supreme and the government's primary function was to maximize each individual's birthright of unimpeded freedom.
It was the first nation that deliberately imposed limits on its own national government with a constitution that clearly defined the handful of legitimate functions the national government was allowed to perform.
It was a land that invited the free exchange of ideas, all ideas - noble and profane - a land whose inhabitants welcomed the vigorous debate that ensued.
It was a land where an individual had the inalienable right to decide how the fruits of his life's work would be distributed after his death.
It was a land where a man's rightful property could not be stolen by the government and handed over to another individual.
It was a nation whose inhabitants elevated self reliance, and individual accountability, to virtues.
It was a nation with a notoriously robust sense of humor populated by individuals who were famous for cracking a joke no matter how dire the situation.
It was a land where an immigrant arrived on its shores knowing that success wasn't guaranteed, but the opportunity to make something of yourself was available to anyone willing to put in the hard work.
It was a land where each newcomer added the best of himself to the land he now called home in exchange for the right to call himself an American.
It was a unique place, a nation the likes of which had never been seen before and hasn't been seen since.
What ever happened to that place called America?
If you spot America wandering aimlessly in the uncharted wastelands, tell it to phone home, because We the People are trying to bring it back where it belongs, as that shining city on the hill. |
MAY 2011
|
Exploring American Greatness
Source: Top Story Archive
Why has American Greatness fallen on hard times and how do we restore it to its former glory?
This week, the Free State of PIG dabbles in national introspection, with America's Greatness occupying center stage. We're going to confront American Greatness. We're going to discuss what it is, and what it isn't. We'll also discuss why American Greatness is so diminished in this first decade of the 21st century. We think the decline in American Greatness is why Americans seem inexplicably determined to bulldoze that 'shining city on a hill' and replace it with a cesspool of class envy and tyranny.
Michael Medved's favorite tag line includes a phrase singling out America as "the greatest nation on God's green Earth". There is no question that America's Greatness - real or imagined - is why so much of the world views America with a mixture of hatred, envy and grudging admiration. Around the world, many people would like nothing better than destroy us, but, failing that, they would really, really, like to live here.
The dirty little secret about American Greatness is the fact that so many Americans hate our greatness. Steeped in 'America sucks' from kindergarten through grad school, their stated goal in life is to destroy American Greatness, and make this nation conceived in liberty as impoverished, as full of despair, as terminally crappy, as garden spots like North Korea, or the infamous Ruskie gulag.
The easiest way to start pinning down what American Greatness is, involves stating categorically, what it isn't. American Greatness exists in spite of, not because of, Elected Tormentors at every level of government. Their ideal isn't the rugged American individual or the fabled Minuteman, it's the back alley mugger whose livelihood is stealing.
American Greatness exists in spite of, not because of, a horde of chronically needy parasites, who are no better than a rampaging mob of looters. They're indistinguishable from the rat bastard who throws a brick through a store's front window and runs off with a television set.
American Greatness exists in spite of, not because of, the chronically-oppressed, perpetually caterwauling 'victims', whose only claim to 'infamy' is being born with politically-advantageous immutable traits (race/ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation).
American Greatness exists in spite of, not because of, the border jumping scumbag invaders, who expect to be rewarded, thanked, for inflicting their diseases, their squalor, and their ethnically-cleansing gangs on us.
American Greatness exists in spite of, not because of, the Jihadikazes hiding in our midst. Their American Dream of a USA tyrannized by sharia-wielding mullahs is, in reality, a sovereign individual's nightmare.
Now that we've excluded, looters, muggers, Jihadikazes, border jumpers, professional whiners, and neo-Marxist scumbags, it's time to turn our attention to the individuals who exemplify American Greatness.
American Greatness can produce moments of inspiring courage, during extreme circumstances, as exemplified by the heroism shown on September 11, 2001. We saw American Greatness in action, when members of the NYPD and NYFD entered the dangerously unstable Twin Towers to save the lives of those trapped inside. American Greatness was showcased by the courage of the brave passengers on United Flight 93, who gave their lives to prevent another attack. They etched their Americn Greatness in our minds, by bringing the airliner down near Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
American Greatness is a dedicated law enforcement officer, and true American, Joe Arpaio. After a distinguished, 32 year, federal law enforcement, career which made him the head of DEA for Arizona, Joe set his sights on the post he still holds, Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona. In 1992, this frisky, 60 years young, pup was elected sheriff for the first time. In 2008, after 16 years on the job, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, now a vigorous young lad of 76, just won his fifth, four-year, term as sheriff.
American Greatness is embodied by inspirational men like Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams. Rejecting their assigned victimhood labels, shrugging off the taunts of "Uncle Tom", "boot licker" and "house slave", they refuse to be suffocated by a group identity. Instead, boldly defying the Ethnocrat asshats, they dare to conduct their lives as that American classic, the individual.
American Greatness is that farmer, salesman, coal miner, trucker, or byte wrangler who puts his daily life on hold, then dons a uniform and ventures forth to defend this nation from its sworn enemies. They put their lives on the line...they go in harm's way, to defend the right of those so-called Americans back home, who view American Greatness as a cardinal sin.
A more common form of American Greatness is the kind we encounter every day, but don't recognize. It might be that pimple-faced, perpetually smirking, 12 year old down the street, who makes you feel like an idiot when he fixes, in 5 minutes, the computer problem you've been fighting for 2 weeks. Try to ignore that 'you're still a moron' look, because that pimple-faced pest might very well be the next Steve Jobs, or Bill Gates.
American Greatness is that rugged individual who carves out his own, modest, outpost of capitalism through his hard work, long hours, and grim determination. He's not planning to become a full of himself slacker like a Kennedy or a Rockefeller, who is coasting through life on the borrowed greatness of a room temperature ancestor. This rugged individual only wants Uncle Sam to get out of his way, so he can test himself in the marketplace, and, if it all goes well, leave his family a little better off in the process.
American Greatness is a rank and file American who dares to pin back the Dumbo ears on a presidential candidate, by asking this mantra spewing meathead a pointed question. Despite the fact that the candidate showed up in his neighborhood, on his front lawn, Joe the Plumber had his life turned upside down, inside out, by Messiah Barry's minions. Shrugging it all off, Joe the Plumber kept speaking out. In the process, he showed that he, John Q. Public, had a better grip on the Founding Fathers' dream for America, than all the self-aggrandizing gasbags on Capitol Hill.
American Greatness is that rank and file American, who puts in 16 hours a day on two jobs so his son or daughter can be the first member of his family to get a college degree. The only reward he seeks is giving his children a leg up on the ladder of success.
American Greatness is that anachronism, the sovereign individual, who has the nads to tell the Nanny State to take their liberty-infringing safety net and shove it. It's the willingness to tell that persistent pest, Uncle Sam, "Back off, punk, I can live my life without your constant interference."
American Greatness is everything that our home-grown neo-Marxists, and their Dumbo-eared Messiah, hate about sovereign individuals. At its core, American Greatness is about daring to defy the Korrectniks. American Greatness is telling the parasites (in and out of government) "not on my dime", and "never with my consent". American Greatness is the willingness to fail, repeatedly, on the road to success. American Greatness is taking responsibility for your own actions. American Greatness is daring to celebrate your successes and having the guts to admit - and learn from - your mistakes.
Now that we've illustrated what American Greatness is, and what it isn't, it's time to answer the relevant question: Why are the Obamunists, Korrectniks and Elected Tormentors so determined to eradicate it? Why? Because they know that American Greatness and rugged individualism are joined at the hip. They know that you can't get rid of that pest American Greatness without eradicating individualism, from sea to shining sea.
As long as Americans dare to be individuals, they will continue to resist the Siren Song of neo-Marxist tyranny. As long as Americans dare to be individuals, who strive on their own initiative for greatness, it will be impossible to turn them into faceless, nameless, slaves of the all-powerful Nanny State.
Unfortunately, the Korrectniks, the neo-Marxists, have been very successful in undermining American Greatness and rugged American individualism. For more than two decades, they have been programming the clueless to reject their individualism and replace it with a group identity. They sweetened the deal by giving perks to group think minions, and imposing penalties on recalcitrant individuals. Those clucking "American Greatness sucks" chickens came home to roost in an election that made an unrepentant, Joe Stalin class, Marxist the president of this once great nation.
The enemies of American Greatness won't stop until every stubborn individual holdout is tracked down and fitted with slave of the Nanny State chains.
If you want to revive American Greatness, you must start by daring to proclaim: I am, first and foremost, an American, a sovereign American individual. I am not a victim. I am not a class envy-riddled parasite. I am the author of my own life. As the master of my own fate, my destiny is in my hands. I don't need to be coddled, protected or babied by the Nanny State, so back the hell off, Sparky.
The fate of American Greatness is in your hands, PIGsters.
The Truth Is Out There
Source: Top Story Archives
[This week, Bubba crawled out from under his rock and pulled a suffocating Orwellian stinker from his butt.
(Politico) — Bill Clinton doesn't like all the misinformation and rumors floating on the Internet. And he thinks the United Nations or the U.S. government should create an agency to do something about it.
"It would be a legitimate thing to do," Clinton said in an interview airing Friday on CNBC.
The agency, Clinton said, would "have to be totally transparent about where the money came from" and would have to be "independent" because "if it's a government agency in a traditional sense, it would have no credibility whatever, particularly with a lot of the people who are most active on the internet."
Faced with this 21st century version of Orwell's Ministry of Truth, I decided to run this classic FSOP rant up the flagpole. Why? It, too deals with 'the truth', and related topics.]
When you're called to testify in court, you swear to 'tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth'. That's all well and good, but, in this first decade of the 21st century, the 'truth' in general, and 'the whole truth', in particular, have fallen on hard times. Never very popular, telling the truth now qualifies as that bane of Brit civility: antisocial behavior.
The truth has fallen on such hard times that many of us wouldn't recognize it if it fell on us. In fact, the level of discourse in America has become so convoluted that, when someone does dispense the truth, we're convinced it's a dastardly lie.
The problems with the digging out the truth (AKA objective reality) are twofold. First, and foremost, few people have any real enthusiasm for 'the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth'. Objective reality is a major pain in the butt. Many of us simply turn our back on it, then give it the finger, by believing whatever we damn please. It's easier to pointedly ignore those 'inconvenient truths'.
The second problem with digging out the truth involves trying to find it. Despite living in the so-called information age, where spiffy electronic gizmos keep you in constant contact with the entire world, the truth is in short supply. Everyplace you look, you're confronted by spin-doctored half-truths, self-serving whoppers, and unmitigated bullshit. Thanks to blizzard of conflicting data on the Internet, and a MSM with its own truth-defying agenda, it takes a lot of hard work to separate the nuggets of truth from the Mt. Everest size pile of bull crap that continues to assault us.
Today, the Free State of PIG will do its level best to dispel some of the lies - momentous and minuscule alike. We'll begin our exploration of lies, with one, life-saving, lie that every dude should commit to memory. It's one of a select group of lies (white lies), which can shield you from painful domestic discord.
You're getting ready for an evening out with your significant, female, other and it's all going along smoothly, until she hits you with it. Posing in her outfit of the moment, she asks: "Does this make me look fat?" (She might have a Kim Kardashian fixation and ask, "Does this make my butt look like the southern end of a northbound hippo?) No matter how she phrases it, you're instantly on the hot seat. What should you do? LIE, because the TRUTH will turn you into a crime statistic.
Now that we've cited one time when 'the truth won't set you free', the Free State of PIG will serve up some of the most noxious lies, which get on our last raw nerve.
LIE: The government can spend us into prosperity.
Truth: The amount of prosperity a nation has is inversely proportional to the size of government. The bigger the government gets, the less prosperity you have. Why? The government doesn't create anything. All it does is make it harder (impossible, in many cases) for sovereign individuals to create their own prosperity through hard work, long hours and ingenuity.
Remember, the government only gets money in one of two ways. It can print it up, in which case your money is worth much, much, less, thus diminishing your prosperity. Or, it can take money from those who earned it and give it to those who didn't. This too, diminishes prosperity.
LIE: Wealth is a static commodity.
Truth: Wealth is not a pie with fixed dimensions. Allowing one person to prosper, does not, automatically, mean that someone else is destined to suffer. Wealth is dynamic and is, often, created from a simple idea.
The computer industry is a prime example. The introduction of the personal computer set off an on-going chain reaction of wealth creation. Computers need a variety of electronic circuitry (such as memory chips) to operate, a fact which spawned the thriving semiconductor sector of our economy. Computers need an operating system, a fact which made Bill Gates a billionaire and Microsoft one of the largest companies in the world. An operating system is useless without programs to perform essential tasks, a fact that created more wealth, with the creation of the thriving software industry. Computer users needed to exchange information, a fact which led to the creation of the Internet, where companies like Amazon and Google created more wealth.
Granted, at any instant in time, the proverbial 'pie' is a fixed size. But, in the next instant, it has grown much bigger.
LIE: Fairness - an equality of results - is the natural order of things.
Truth: Life is, by it's very nature, unfair. The natural order of things is an unequal distribution of skills, attributes, and intellect.
Life is not, however, unjust. One set of, non-negotiable, natural, laws controls all of objective reality, including everyone, everything, contained therein.
LIE: There is something inherently evil about giving 'the rich' a tax cut.
Truth: Tax cuts, by their very nature, must go to those who paid taxes in the first place. 'The rich' (especially the top 5 to 10 percent) pay the lion's share of the taxes. That's why, quite properly, they get the most benefit from a tax cut.
Giving a 'tax cut' to one of the 40% of wage earners who paid no taxes isn't a tax cut. It's a welfare check, which is being laundered through the IRS.
LIE: Eradicating failure via a social safety net is a worthwhile government function.
Truth: Failure plays a vital role in each individual's intellectual, psychological, development. It is an essential part of our individual learning curve/character development. It's called reaping what you sow. It's called being responsible for your own actions and it is - was - a key component in the rugged individualism which sets Americans apart.
Social promotions, classes where just showing up for school earns you a 60 score (out of a possible 100), youth sports where nobody keeps score and everyone is declared a winner, do more harm than good. They leave the coddled individual unprepared for objective reality's nasty surprises. Worst of all, they render the coddled individual egregiously susceptible to the Siren Song of a cradle to grave Nanny State.
LIE: Global Warming is man-made.
Truth: Solar cycles and other natural processes - prolonged outbursts of volcanic activity, for example - were heating, and cooling, the earth long before mankind arrived on the scene. Mankind had nothing to do with the eons when the entire earth was covered with a sheet of ice. Mankind had nothing to do with the prolonged hot spell which spawned the dinosaurs. Mankind is just along for the ride, while Mother Earth continues to do what she has always done. The only thing we accomplish with this Global Warming hysteria is to give militant neo-Marxists a new excuse to exterminate capitalism, and the prosperity it brings. Global Warming - as espoused by that insane bastard in the Fat Cave - is the gold standard for junk science.
Everywhere we turn, somebody is trying to foist off fertilizer as 'the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth'. The Smoke Nazis give objective reality the one-finger salute, when they tell us that the smoke from a cancer stick is more dangerous, to a bystander, than it is to the clown who is inhaling it directly into his lungs. The Fat Nazis assure us that exterminating transfats will transform us all into lean, mean, fighting machines. The bailout buttheads insist that giving trillions of dollars to companies which already pissed away all their own money is the highest form of fiscal responsibility. The Korrectniks stand reality on its head, when they make a desperado rat bastard's thoughts (hate crimes) more important than his, her, hisher or its criminal act.
It's time to jettison the bull crap, half truths and blatant bullshit. It's time to stand up and tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
• The Jihadikazes were not 'oppressed' by a militant Uncle Sam into acting out their 'rage'. Long before Uncle Sam was a gleam in the Founding Father's eye, they were on a murderous rampage in parts of Europe.
• Michael Moore and Messiah Al Gore are propaganda punks who never saw an element of American capitalism they didn't want to eradicate.
• Border Jumping scumbags aren't tragic economic refugees seeking a better life. They are invaders who are infesting our cities with their squalor, their ethnically cleansing gang bangers, and their diseases. They extract much more from America than they contribute.
The 'X Files' insists that "The truth is out there". That's true enough, but it's up to you to do the heavy lifting, when it comes finding, defending, and promoting it. You won't get the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth from the News Nitwits. You won't get it from your Elected Tormentors. You won't get it from your favorite boom box babbler. You won't get it from the Obamunist 'truth squad' whose only job is to eradicate any inconvenient Messiah Barry related facts.
And what, you ask, about the Free State of PIG? Do we claim to serve up 'the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth'? Not really. We give it the old college try, but we never claimed to be paragons of objective reality. We call them as we see them, but, unlike most of the liars, damn liars and statistics wranglers mentioned in this rant, we're willing to own up to our factual errors and set the record straight.
The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? It's something worth striving for, but the odds of getting it are daunting. The only things less popular than 'the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth' are the oft-maligned "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness". Here in the Free State of PIG, we're determined to defend both of these vilified tenets.
The truth is out there, but it's up to you to find it, PIGster Mulder Sparky.
[Before Bubba puts Uncle Sam and/or the Black Helicopter Club in charge of a cyberspace Ministry of Truth, he might want to pull his head out of his ass. He needs to get real, because most of the whoppers I cited in this rant, are perpetrated by, and/or endorsed by, Uncle Sam and the Black Helicopter Club.]
Guest Commentary
Source: This prose by IMAO's Frank J landed in our e-mail 'In' box.
Don't Worry: Osama Was Shot in Accordance with Islamic Tradition
Frank J. Fleming knows the very first thing that went through your mind when you heard of bin Laden's death: were all the religious niceties observed?
I know what was probably the first thing to go through your mind when you heard the news that Osama bin Laden had been killed: Was his dead body handled properly according to Islamic tradition? Well, on behalf of the U.S. government, I am happy to tell you that yes, it absolutely was.
I think in these situations, the most important thing to us is showing religious respect. We didn't like how Osama was responsible for murdering thousands of innocent men, women, and children, but that was just one aspect of the man. Another aspect was that he was a Muslim — and that was a good part of him that we greatly respect. Because Islam is a great religion. Really great. Personally, I don't practice it, but others do, and they really seem to like it. So, while we didn't like the terrorist side of Osama, I think everyone understands that we still need to celebrate the Muslim side of him and give it the respect it deserves.
So that's why everyone involved was very careful to handle his dead body in accordance with Islamic tradition… as best they could. I mean, there were a few minor bumps along the way, like when the body kinda sorta got dragged off by wild dogs. That happens. No one is perfect, not even the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)). And you have to understand that dogs are just animals, and a big difference between animals and people is the ability to show respect for Islamic traditions. Anyway, those dogs were chased immediately, the body was retrieved, and the canines involved were given a stern talking to.
Unfortunately, while everyone was preoccupied with yelling "Bad dog!" a cat jumped up on the body. And if you've ever owned a cat, you know they're mischievous little creatures. That's part of their charm. Anyway, the cat ate one of his eyeballs. So, not great there on respecting the body according to Islamic tradition, but accidents happen. And while everyone was trying to get the eyeball back, a raccoon started chewing on the body — which is really weird, because they're not even indigenous to the region. But the raccoon was chased off in accordance with Islamic tradition. Well, I mean, the Qur'an doesn't specifically mention chasing off animals trying to chew on a dead body, but it's heavily implied that you should.
So, at this point, I wouldn't say the body had been disrespected, but it obviously was not an auspicious start. Like if there were an Olympic event for treating a dead body in accordance with Islamic tradition, the U.S. would probably have been out of the running for the gold at that point. And then we probably could forget about the silver when a point was deducted for letting the body roll down a hill (I'm assuming an Olympic event for treating a dead body in accordance with Islamic tradition would be scored similarly to gymnastics).
Still, everyone was psyched to recover from those mishaps and rally for the bronze (I'm speaking metaphorically; there aren't actually medals for this sort of thing). The body got to the ship without further mishap, and then the ship went out to sea for a nice, respectful-to-Islam burial. Can you think of anything more respectful than a water burial? You can't; I mean, it's out there in nature with all the water… very nice. And the body was wrapped in a clean white sheet — again, really respectful. Someone could have said, "Hey, since we're just going to throw it in the ocean, let's go ahead and use a dirty sheet." But we used a clean sheet, because respect for Osama's religion was that important. And after Osama was nicely wrapped up, he was chucked into the sea with a hearty shout of, "Yay, Allah!" in accordance with Islamic tradition. And then a jig was danced in accordance with Irish tradition.
Still, I know some of you are concerned about when the Navy SEALs raided Osama's compound, whether he was then shot in the face in accordance with Islamic tradition. Well, don't worry; he absolutely was. The very last thing anyone wanted was for Osama to think while he was being killed, "They're doing this to me because I'm Muslim!" Because, again, that would definitely not be true. So great care was taken, and he was shot in the face in a religiously respectful way.
For instance, none of the Navy SEALs in the raid were eating a pork sandwich as they did it. And none of them had on them any depictions of Muhammad (PBUH). Also, the raid was done between prayer times — not during! And when Osama was shot in the face, he was facing westward. I'm not sure that's actually religiously important, but if it is, then, yes, he was doing that. And when he was shot, the traditional Muslim expression of "Allahu Akbar!" was shouted — except it was an English translation, so it was something like, "Thank you, Jesus!"
Of course, not everyone interprets the Qur'an the same way, so Osama was also shot in accordance with a few other traditions to make sure all bases were covered. So he was shot eleven times total. But there was a little hitch — he didn't actually die from the gunshots. It kind of caught everyone off guard, and they were a bit stumped on what religiously respectful thing to do next. But then a quick thinking SEAL grabbed a Qur'an and beat Osama to death with it.
Okay, maybe that wasn't the best idea in the history of respecting religions, but you can understand the sentiment. How comforting for Osama was it that the last thing he saw was his own holy book? Still, it's understandable how some would see that as the opposite of being respectful, so the U.S. government would like to say to the friends and family of Osama — those who haven't been killed or captured — a heartfelt "Oopsie." And we assure you, the Qur'an was cleaned off, and an imam looked it over to make sure it was not permanently harmed. So no worries there.
Still, it's a great time for America, and it was was nice to see all those people cheering in the streets Sunday night when they heard the news that Osama had been treated in a way that respected his religion. Because that's what is important in this modern world, and we work very hard on respecting the culture of those we have to kill for pragmatic reasons. And it's hard, because people can really take it the wrong way when you storm their compounds and start shooting them. They may think, "Are Americans doing this because they look down on our religion and culture?" And no one wants that; we want to hurt people, not feelings.
That's why all hellfire missiles now have written on the front of them, "This shouldn't be construed as a negative view of your religion." And the battle cry of the United States Marines has been changed to "THIS IS WITH THE UTMOST RESPECT!" It's terrifying when men armed with assault rifles yell it while firing at you … but at the same time, it's a little comforting.
Again, I have to emphasize that America has no problem with Islam — just with terrorists — many of whom happen to be Muslim … and we think it's great they've chosen such a lovely religion with such a storied culture. That's not a problem for us… It's just the murdering. That's our only beef.
And that's why everyone involved in hunting terrorists these days is well-trained in being respectful to those they're gunning down. And we can only hope that the last thing that went through Osama's head was the thought, "Wow, these Americans killing me sure are respectful of my religious views."
Well, the last thing before the bullet, that is. The certified halal bullet.
|
APRIL 2011
|
How do I get out of 'HERE'?
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts
Somewhere along the line, America got detached from objective reality and ended up 'here'. 'Here' has its random nifty moments, but, by and large 'here' sucks. The more you look around, the more you realize that 'here' is a hopelessly irrational place where the laws of logic work in reverse, where the illogical, the 'anything but that', becomes an idea whose time has come.
'Here' is the place where an untested, smooth talking empty suit has ascended to the Oval Office, a notoriously stressful job where rookie mistakes are intolerably disastrous.
'Here' is the place where, after nearly 2 ½ years on the job, the empty suit in the Oval Office hasn't found time to meet with his own cabinet.
'Here' is the place where the empty suit in the Oval Office spends all his time campaigning for a job he already holds and spends none of his time doing the job he has held down for more than 2 years.
'Here' is the place where the empty suit in the Oval Office bypasses Congress, ignores the U.S. Constitution, and rules by decree, using a combination of executive orders, signing statements, and instructions to his job for life toadies in the federal bureaucracy.
'Here' is the place criticizing the neo-Marxist policies of the Obama Regime earns the critic a 'racist' label from all the president's men.
'Here' is a place where proven energy sources like nuclear power and domestic oil reserves are kept off line, while the Nanny State pours Porkulus dollar$ down alternative energy ratholes whose only source of income is government largess.
'Here' is a place where oinking trillion dollar Legicrap turds which do little more than pay off Demoncrat supporters are sold as an economic rescue plan.
'Here' is a place where the Elephant Clan, which was given a mandate in November 2010 to cut the Nanny State down to size, is up to their old 'Big Government Business as Usual' tricks.
'Here' is a place where the Elephant Clan spends all its time currying favor with the MSM which hates them and none of their time pleasing the sovereign individuals who elected them.
'Here' is a place where political correctness makes America's gatekeepers in Homeland Stupidity ignore Islamikazes, because screening them is Islamophobic profiling.
'Here' is a place where job for life asshattery makes Homeland Stupidity leave our porous southern border wide open, because all those Border Jumping Scumbag Invaders are future Demoncrat voters.
'Here' is a place where tykes are manhandled by TSA lowlifes who get a perverse thrill out of pissing off We the People.
'Here' is a place where, in the name of restoring the 'American Dream' entire segments of the economy are nationalized, while other businesses are impoverished with punishing taxes, restrictions and regulations.
'Here' is a place where Nanny State nitwits think the road to recovery goes through the money printing room of the U.S. Mint.
'Here' is a place where Elected Tormentors shout 'transparency' from the rooftops, while abusing their authority by keeping We the People in the dark.
'Here' is a place where in the name of free speech and letting everyone be heard, dissenting voices must be muzzled.
'Here' is place where the primary criteria for a position in Messiah Barry's administration is "cheated on my taxes".
'Here' is a place where alleged journalists have more in common with that Commie rag Pravda, than the hard-charging journalists of the pre-electronic media era.
'Here' is a place where the MSM Barack Suckers are indistinguishable from The One's personal spokeshole, the Red Shed Press Secretary.
'Here' is the place where the fools who ran up trillions of dollars in red ink are given the keys to the treasury and a green light to empty the wallets of the blithering idiots who keep re-electing them.
'Here' is a place where the biggest, stinkiest pile of junk science blames the Earth's eons old natural heating and cooling cycles on human activity, then proposes Draconian changes that, by the purveyors own admission, won't make one iota of difference.
'Here' is a place where, while food prices are skyrocketing, the fools running this lunatic asylum pay some farmers not to grow crops and pay others to divert key crops from the food chain so they can pour them down a biofuels rathole.
'Here is a place where achievement is punished with ruinous taxes while failure is subsidized with the achiever's hard earned money.
'Here' is the only place I've ever been where the national motto is "They've got to be kidding."
If I stay 'here' much longer, I'm going to snap. You'll know when it happens. How? Old Betsy, Hambo, a boatload of ammo, a high place with a clear field of fire.
Fatal Flaws?
Source: Shallow Hambo Thoughts [04/22/11]
One of the most memorable lines from Martin Luther King, Jr.'s 'I Have A Dream' speech is, ironically, more venerated by 'whitey' than it is by the Melanin-Enriched. I refer, as if you haven't guessed, to this memorable prose:
"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."
Normally, whenever a scribbler builds a rant around that quote the topic under discussion is race. If you think we are going down that road, get over it. We've been there, done that, and we'll do it again, but not today. Instead, I am going to take a look at "the content of their character".
By and large, whenever this subject - 'character' - crops up, it involves a public official, or some other person in a position of authority, whose flawed character has created a newsworthy scandal. It also arises, whenever an election cycle reaches critical mass, and we're forced to punch a chad for the lesser of two evils.
All of that is still in play, but it isn't the primary focus of this rant. Given the sorry condition of this once great nation...given the precarious status of our inalienable individual liberty, I think it's time for some self evaluation. It's time to assess the American Character of that grinning fool in our mirror, We the People Sparky. It's time to confront our own character flaws, then evaluate the role they play in America's sorry condition.
If as KFI's John & Ken proclaim, our government - local, state, and federal - is infested with 'liars, thieves, and whores', I wonder what that says about us. These liars, thieves and whores didn't find their job in government at the bottom of a Cracker Jacks box. If they're an Elected Tormentor, We the People put them in that position. If they're a bureaucrat, We the People punched a chad for the scumbag(s) who created their job for life position at the public trough.
'Liars, thieves, and whores' begs the question, "What are the descriptors that apply to rank and file Americans."
In this Obamunist Error, the American Character isn't a pretty sight. Self-reliance, voluntary cooperation between sovereign individual, individual accountability, the work ethic, and pulling yourself up by the bootstraps are on the wane, as rugged American individuals become the USA's newest endangered species. In too many cases, the American Character is tainted, by gullibility, envy, sloth, lies, thievery, dependency, self deception, and thuggish intimidation.
To illustrate what I view as a degradation of the American Character, I will discuss some of these character flaws in greater detail.
Gullibility: The healthy skepticism which was a vital part of the American Character has fallen into disfavor. When our Elected Tormentors, accompanied by a suitable fanfare, proclaim their devotion to fiscal discipline, this character flaw makes too many otherwise intelligent individuals believe them. Willfully myopic, gullible Americans ignore the tsunami of red ink poised to sweep over this land conceived in liberty. Instead, we swallow the budgetary bull crap, which, magically, transforms a slight decrease in the GROWTH of Nanny State spending into a Draconian budget cut.
When we're told that America has every scrap of energy producing fossil fuels in full production, too many of us believe it.
When we're assured that our porous borders are fully protected to an unprecedented degree, too many of us believe it.
Dependency: The inherent need to be self-sufficient has been government-schooled out of a depressingly large percentage of Americans. Why? Self-sufficiency means each individual is responsible for the conduct of their own life. For the properly-indoctrinated, government-schooled idiot with self esteem, making all your own decisions is much too hard. Why bother, when the Nanny State is willing to seize control of your life and micromanage it from the cradle to the grave.
Big Nanny State Daddy will 'protect' you from games you shouldn't play on the school playground. Big Nanny State Daddy will 'protect' you, by dictating what you should, and shouldn't, eat. Big Nanny State Daddy will take care of your loser ass, by providing food, shelter, free health care, and pay you for not working. Big Nanny State Daddy will, in short, attempt to remove 'failure' from a 'cooperative' person's life, but the price is high, since the process also removes 'success'.
Coercion/Intimidation: As envisioned by the Founding Fathers, America's national government's actions were strictly limited, by the U.S. Constitution. That fostered an environment where success often required cooperation - sovereign individuals teaming up, voluntarily, to achieve a mutually-beneficial purpose. It also made for the kind of friendly rivalry between competitors that leads to innovation and efficiency, both of which provide a customer with a better product at a lower cost.
When the Nanny State broke out of its Constitutional cage, and grew into the bloated behemoth it is today, it did what all overgrown asshats do, it started throwing its weight around. That bully boy side of Uncle Sam attracted the attention of certain businessmen, who didn't have the patience to compete in the marketplace. Instead, they 'rented' access to the Nanny State's monopoly on the use of force, then used Nanny State power to give them a competitive advantage. Why bust your ass to beat your competitor, when you can buy a Nanny State minion to 'regulate' your business rival out of the market? This obscenity is called 'crony capitalism' and it's what Ayn Rand meant when she stated that "Government regulation is corrupt and corrupting."
Envy: In a bygone era, America's sovereign individuals greeted an achiever's success with a measure of respect for a the ingenuity and hard word it involved. In many cases, an achiever's success would inspire others to strive for their own personal brass ring. You start with an idea, apply some hard work and long hours. When you do it right, you join the ranks of the achievers.
In this Obamunist Error, achievement, success, and a willingness to reap the rewards for your hard work, are viewed with jealousy, distrust, and hatred. Success is a cardinal sin that must be punished severely. If the achievement is academic, the punishment is denying one of our best and brightest a slot in a top university where he, she, heshe or it can flourish. If the achievement is in the business arena, the punishment is the outright theft of the achiever's rightful property, after which the spoils will be divided between the Nanny State 'collector' and the parasite who isn't bothered by receiving stolen goods.
Are America's sovereign individuals destined for history's scrap heap, and a brief footnote in some history book with a readership in the single digits? I hope not, but the possibility is too, too real.
Am I painting ALL Americans with this broad brush? Hardly. I am, however, confronting the reality that more than four decades of government cess-school indoctrination, cultural Marxism, and Political Korrectness have slowly, inexorably, eroded the American character. I'm also warning that the flaws become more widespread, more discernable, with each new generation.
Is this degradation of the American character a serious problem for America and its future? It played a significant role in putting an America hating, capitalism despising Marxist in the Oval Office, so what do you think, just say no to Obama 2.0 in 2012, Sparky?
Our character is under attack and we aren't all that we once were. We are, I hope not so far gone that we can make things right again.
Hambo the Optimist? Holy crap, do I need a drink.
Another Guest Commentary From Old Frank
Source: Old Frank, via PIGster BroIN
Dear Friends and Colleagues:
Ordinary Americans, roused from their collective slumber by the hubbub raised by their Tea Party neighbors, have finally figured out that government spending is totally out of control and that it has picked up breakneck speed in racing toward the abyss of no return. In the House, Rep. Paul Ryan has offered up a deficit cutting plan that – of course – includes holding spending in check. Tonight, the chief purveyor of our collective impoverishment, is going to present a "plan" of his own. Early leaks suggest that the president's address will be short on details and long on talk, no numbers -- Democrats don't really do numbers – and it will call for "balance" in the form of higher taxes on the "wealthy."
Balance has been determined to be a less socialism-associated term than "fairness." But one can be certain that "balance" in this context will have the identical deleterious effect on your wallet and bank account and won't do terribly much to control spending. Don't be fooled. Raising taxes does NOT and will not raise government revenues. The only way to cut the deficit is to drastically reduce spending. The "mean spirited" and "crippling" cuts that the administration, the Democrat-controlled senate, and their acolytes in the press decried as a government shut-down neared toward the end of last week, were in truth a pin-prick – they represent only HALF of the amount BORROWED by our government during the entire week -- $38 billion was lopped off, as $66 billion was being BORROWED—WITH INTEREST!!
Any plan that doesn't cut spending and CAP it too is unserious. Any tax increase will be immediately spent otherwise on all sorts of "worthy" programs. But numbers don't lie – politicians do, however, and they do it for a living.
Let's see how the near-worthless media portray tonight's address. I'll bet as I write this, they are getting their instructions from the White House on how to do their "stories."
Old Frank
Guest Commentary
Source: Email Inbox
Dear Friends and Colleagues:
[Recently], a great brouhaha erupted over Rep Peter King's (R, NY) hearings into the practice and causes of radicalization of Islamic-American youth here in the USA. The Democrats and the usual suspects in the mainstream media protested that even bringing up this subject amounted to "racism," "profiling," and interference with the "freedom of religion" aspects of the First Amendment. The Democrat members of Rep King's committee all from the same sheet music – ad nauseum – each time they got the mike. The next day, the liberal press played up only the crocodile tears of Rep Elison (D, NY), the only Muslim member of the congress. A couple of the Democrats were totally reprehensible in suggesting that the King hearings should be looking at all sorts of radicalism – especially the Ku Klux Klan, American Nazis, and the like rather than singling out Muslim terrorism. This was truly ironic -- Too bad Senator Harry Byrd [D, WVA] died last year. They might have called upon him to give first-hand accounts about how much fun he had as Grand Kleagle of the Klan in his earlier days. Harry proved that the Democrat party certainly had a BIG tent – everything from Klansmen to Soviet spies.
But anyone watching the hearings on C-SPAN (as I did) found compelling testimony as to the extent of radicalization within the American Muslim community and the intimidation that peaceful American citizen Muslims face when they try to expose, question, or remedy those efforts. These facts were conveniently -- and purposefully "overlooked" by the media reports of the hearing.
Now, to further "burnish" its creds with the "Muslim community"(AKA vote scrounging and money gathering) and be seen as a "reasonable" counter-voice to such ugly Republicans as Congressman King, a Senate committee under its chairman, Dick Durbin (D, IL) is holding "hearings" to "expose" the "persecution" of Muslims here in the US by us ugly Americans (that's you and me, in case you didn't get it). But, last night on Bret Baer's news hour on Fox News Channel, we learned that just a couple of weeks ago, Chairman Durbin had a photo op with a group of self-anointed spokesmen for American Muslims. The group included several well-known and active supporters of Muslim terrorist organizations – as identified by US security officials (FBI, CIA, Homeland Security, etc.) It turns out that Fox News found that the group is a big contributor to Durbin's campaign coffers and other funding mechanisms. It used to be that when one consorted with known criminals or terrorists, they were at minimum "embarrassed;" but, now some hold "hearings." I searched in vain for any mainstream media notice of the Fox News Channel report in today's papers and news broadcasts. Surprise, surprise … no reference. One can only surmised that real reporting has become too stressful.
Contrast what's being done here. Americans and the American heartland have under attack by Muslim terrorists – foreign and domestic – for more than 30 years and in the past decade the attacks have been devastatingly successful (never forget "9-11" and the cheering, tear-stained faces of the "Muslim Street" upon learning of the murderous mayhem that their co-religionists had wrought). In the aftermath of 9-11 we found that many American and Western born Muslims had joined the ranks of the Jihadists and that more continue to become radicalized day after day. So, to look into this is somehow "racist" or "profiling?" In the immediate aftermath of 9-11, Muslim Americans braced for a backlash. None came. Americans don't act that way. We recognized that our neighbors didn't commit those atrocious acts and were most likely abhorred them. In the decade since, there have been virtually NO acts of false "retribution" against our Muslim communities. But nonetheless, within those communities there bubbles a fringe element of hatred and radicalization – and some of it spills from the Mosques themselves!! And meanwhile a whole industry of Muslim apologists has been formed – with oil money from the Saudis, and the rest of the Persian Gulf producers – to continually admonish us about non-existent or imagined "prejudice" and "profiling." Apparently, their money has even bought at least one senator from Illinois who now "distinguishes" himself by holding "hearings" into our collective (but nonexistent) bad deeds.
Two questions (and I'll bet you know the answers to both): One, why hasn't the story of Durbin's ties to members of radical Muslim organizations and his calls for "hearings" gotten legs? And two, why do the Prog-Lib-Democrats so hate Fox News Channel?
Old Frank |
Dangerous Democracy Delusions
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts [03/27/11]
Two, seemingly unrelated, Beltway Bozo brainfarts are in the process of combining into a critical mass. Once the ensuing chain reaction runs its course, it will destroy Israel, and make this land conceived in liberty an easier target for our Jihadikaze enemies.
One brainfart has been with us for at least a decade, probably much longer. It went ‘viral’ in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attack on America, when nobody had the balls to state the obvious: Islam which motivates our enemies is, by it’s very nature, incompatible, with our individual liberty. Unfortunately, everyone inside the beltway, agreed, when President Georg W. Bush stated emphatically, that ‘we are not at war with Islam’. What he never stated...what the Beltway Bozos have never admitted, is the incontrovertible fact that Islam, driven by significant portion of its adherents, is at war with us. It's at war with our inalienable individual liberty.
The people in positions of power, especially those put there by the Obama Regime, refuse to confront the critical role that Islam plays in our ongoing war with Jihadikaze rat bastards. In 2011, this willful myopia means that the people who should be paying attention to our homegrown Jihadikazes - Islamikazes like the Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the Fort Hood murderer - are too busy trying to blame these home front attacks on a crappy childhood, rampant Islamophobia among We the People, and/or some undiagnosed mental breakdown. They blame these home front attacks on anything/everything except the real cause: Islam. Because of this willful myopia, we are fighting a war with our eyes closed, against an enemy whom we’re not allowed to name. It’s the express lane to our defeat and, ultimately, our destruction.
By itself, our 'Islam is the enemy of our liberty' blind spot dooms us to an eventual defeat. That defeat looms larger, these days, due to the second brainfart, which has reached epidemic proportions, within both of our political clans. The name of this brainfart is reflected in the title for this rant: Dangerous Democracy Delusions. We hear it from The One. We hear it from the fossil he defeated in the 2008 general election. We hear it from the Elected Tormentors who spend too much time in the Washington D. C. Twilight Zone and too little time in objective reality. We hear it from MSM Barack suckers. We hear it too often and I, for one, am sick of it.
I’ll f-ing explode if I hear Barry, the MSM Barack suckers, Juan McCain, or anyone else, gush about resurgence of Democracy in North Africa and other parts of the Islamikaze world. Today (Sunday March 27, 2011) McCain betrayed his profound ignorance, with this statement:
"This is a moment of historic proportions, and this will give us a moment of opportunity to help with the spread of democracy."
Is Juan on crack? Has he self-medicated his brain into neutral? Is it even remotely possible that he doesn’t know the difference between Democracy and Individual Liberty? Does this fool really equate Democracy and Individual Liberty, when truth is that they’re worlds apart:
"The importance of the distinction between freedom and democracy cannot be overstated. Democracy is living by permission of others, constantly subject to their whims, simply because they are the majority. It matters not whether the master is a government acting as the agent for the majority, or a lawless, un-ruly mob. Either way, the subject is a slave. It mustn’t be forgotten that it wasn’t freedom that killed the great philosopher, Socrates, but democracy." (Free World Trading Company)
In places like Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Syria, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Libya, Democracy means deposing one kind of tyranny - the tyranny of an autocrat - and putting another kind of tyranny - the liberty nuking tyranny of Sharia - in its place. The spread of Democracy, in these Islamikaze infested, Sharia-venerating, nations is not a cause for celebration. Instead, it’s a cause for concern. McCain’s beloved ‘Democracy’ revival is the resurgence of mob rule and this mob is more likely to venerate Ayatollah Khomeini than Thomas Jefferson.
McCain, et al, aren’t the only ones suffering from these Dangerous Democracy Delusions. It’s the prevailing - until recently - editorial policy at the New York Times. This week, the realization that mob rule is invariably ugly took the NYT Moonbats by surprise. Belatedly, they took a close look at the people who will fill the power vacuum that was created by Mubarak’s departure from the scene. During the uprising and afterwards - until Libya took center stage - rational adults warned that the Muslim Brotherhood would be the new rulers of Egypt. That, everyone with a functioning synapse knew, would mean an Egyptian society that bears an uncomfortable resemblance to Iran and Saudi Arabia. The only ones who couldn't, wouldn't, see it worked at the Times.
This week, the New York Times, looked at the results of the Egyptian elections, and said ‘Yup, it certainly looks like the Muslim Brotherhood won the elections. Who would have seen THAT one coming?' Of course, they’re still in Sharia denial, concerning Egypt, but, eventually, even those NYT will smell the Sharia coffee. Unhappily, the NYT isn’t the alone, when it comes to deliberately ignoring the truth about events in the Middle East.
Unwilling to learn from the events in Egypt, the usual suspects - MSM and Elected Tormentors alike - willfully ignored the fun facts about the ‘Democracy seekers’ in Libya. The primary fun fact is that, like the Democracy seekers in other Islamikaze nations, the Libyan insurgents are in cahoots with Osama bin Laden and his al-qaeda Jihadikazes. It means that The One has our men and women in uniform aiding and abetting Jihadikazes who spent quality time, trying to kill American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.
If you think these al-qaeda affiliates are ‘over it’ now and gung ho for Uncle Sam and liberty, wake up! In the early days of the rebellion in Libya, the ‘Democracy seekers’ rewarded Osama and his pals, by giving them a lot of the weaponry Libya’s reigning tyrant amassed in his armories. That means, while the USAF keeps the rat bastards safe, in Libya, the Democracy seekers are repaying us, by sending weapons to Afghanistan, where they will be used against our men and women on the front lines.
I don’t expect much from Juan McCain, but, since he spouted off about this ‘moment of historic proportions’ he should pull his head out of his ass and try to get it right. The inconvenient truth about the ‘Democracy’ sweeping the Islamikaze world is downright ugly, because, when the dust settles, and the last tyrant is evicted, there will be an unbroken string of ‘little Irans’ in North Africa. Our friends, the Israelis will find themselves with ‘little Irans’ on all sides. It would be nice if Juan McCain tried to wrap his mind around THAT, before he started flapping his gums about this tidal wave of Democracy that is sweeping across the Islamikaze world.
I wonder if this RINO fossil will have the nads to, probably long after it’s all said and done, admit that, while it’s spiffy that all the tyrants are gone, it’s not spiffy that one kind of tyranny was supplanted by another. I wonder if he’ll have the guts to admit that the willful refusal to name our enemy played a critical role in transforming the Middle East into series of 7th century outposts of tyranny, all of which use Iran as their role model. The answer to all of the above - assuming, of course, that he even admits the truth to himself - is probably not.
With or without The One ensconced in the Oval Office, Uncle Sam would be hard pressed to control the flow of events that are transforming the Islamikaze world. On that score, we are, unhappily, in a lose-lose situation, where all our options suck. That doesn’t mean there’s nothing that needs to be done. We could, and should, do what we can to prepare for this radicalized, terminally hostile Islamikaze world that’s headed our way. We could, and should, for example, strengthen our ties with Israel, a country which might be, our last, best, hope to neutralize the destructive power of all the ‘little Irans’ that are popping up in their immediate neighborhood. Finally, we could, should, and must limit the power of these ‘little Irans’ by unshackling our domestic energy reserves, taking the ‘oil weapon’ out of the enemy’s hands.
Will The One, Juan McCain, and/or our other Democracy Deluded Elected Tormentors wake up before it’s too late? Not of their own free will, but, they might get with the program, if We the People assert our authority and demand that they wake up, before it’s too late. The next move is ours, We the People Sparky, and the time to make it is NOW.
Parting shot: I'm not opposed, in theory, or in practice, to letting Libyans, Syrians, etc. name their own poison. If, when they determine their nation's fate, they trade autocratic tyranny for Sharia-based tyranny, so be it. I'm not saying that Uncle Sam should try use his military to stop them. I am saying that the willfully myopic meatheads inside the beltway need to open their eyes and see the world for what it is, instead of leaving their eyes shut and assuming the world is the way that they want it to be. Wake up and smell the coffee? You better believe it, Sparky.
Guest Commentary
Source: Hambo’s E-Mail
Old Frank Asks: Am I Alone
Am I alone, foolish, uncaring, mean-spirited, or simply confused? I keep reading in the New York Times and the Washington Post, and in watching reports on ABC, CBS, and NBC that I must be one of the above because I DO believe that Congressman King’s hearings on the causes of radicalization of homegrown Muslim youth are a good idea. But the media tell me that King’s hearings constitute racial profiling and that the “radicalization” of other (unspecified) groups should also be on the agenda. Hmmmm. I must have missed which of those other groups have been murdering us here and abroad while proclaiming Allahu Akbar.
I also believed that President Bush and his team did their best to protect us and adopted the least worse of possible alternatives, to keep the worst of the worst in humanitarian, indeterminate confinement at Guantanamo. But, I must have been wrong on that count too because the same media kept telling me that it was un-American and cruel to keep those poor folks cooped up. Meanwhile prestigious, leftist law firms from the Big Apple and D.C. kept sending their “brightest” down to Guantanamo to represent those murderous thugs – pro bono. And then the media informed me that I should welcome “hope and change” that would include the closing of Guantanamo and the speedy trial of all of those poor folks being held there. But, day before yesterday -- ooops -- the “hope and change” bunch came to the realization (rather late actually) that there really isn’t (and wasn’t) any other way to treat with the Guantanamo detainees, but the exact same way the Bush bunch had done. A similar thing happened with the “dreadful” Patriot Act. Hmmmm. Looking in from the outside and criticizing wildly without a firm grip on the facts gets the media’s total support to get one elected. But, they can’t help them govern once in office.
Meanwhile, as the world’s remaining superpower squanders its prestige as it dithers on whether to impose a no-fly zone, the Libyan tyrant’s killing machines lay waste to his countrymen who want to free themselves from his 40 year cruel and wasteful dictatorship. The “hope and change” bunch wish us to believe that gaining air superiority over Libya by taking out its anti-aircraft systems is a daunting task. That is total baloney! We have an AOB (air order of battle) that tells us precisely the full panoply of radar frequencies that the Libyan systems employ. We have pods on our fighters that read those signals as soon as they light up and we launch counter missiles that home in precisely on the anti-aircaft installations. We’ve been doing that since Vietnam. And our capability has increased by leaps and bounds since then. We did it in the Gulf War and again in taking out Saddam’s air force a decade or so later. In addition, we now have stealth bombers and fighters that don’t even present enough of a radar cross-section or infra-red signature to permit detection and tracking by enemy radars and IR sensors. But, we are also told that we and the Brits must “wait” for UN approval in order to act. I guess we don’t want to “go it alone” like those ‘ugly’ Bushies did. Good luck with getting the UN on board. And, if they ever do approve action, it will most likely be too late to save the lives of the Libyan freedom fighters – who are begging for our help. But since the media tell me that “hope and change” are doing all they can, I guess that I must be alone, foolish, uncaring, mean-spirited, or simply confused on this issue too. Likewise with the rest of the “Bush lied” nonsense, that happens to be now, albeit tardily, recognized to have been the verity of verities. Apologies anyone?
Return Engagement
Source: Top Story Archive
[This week’s commentary is a timely trip down memory lane. I selected it, because it’s a one of my favorites.]
Calendar Clutter.
Marching to the beat of a different drummer, PIG gets real about holidays and other recurring blights.
Too soon, it will be St. Patrick’s Day. Once again, we will have our sanity assaulted by a bunch of inane nitwits, most of whom aren’t Irish, couldn’t find Ireland on a globe if their life depended on it, and have a pathological hatred for green every other day of the year.
Green beer? Leprechauns? Stupid looking hats? Family, friends, co-workers and strangers nagging you about the lack of green in your attire? A frontal assault on your sanity by musical terrorists who bellow out "Danny Boy" every 3 minutes? Is this the best Ireland, the Irish, have to offer? Give me a break.
We get the part about national/ethnic pride running amok. We get the fact that, for one day of the year, it’s cool to be Irish. We get the fact that, after you cut through all the crap, St. Patrick’s Day has nothing to do with snakes, or holy rollers who chased them from the storied isle. For most of us, St. Patrick’s Day is an excuse to get blasted and slur our speech with a faux Irish accent. Ireland, the Irish, deserve better, and quite frankly, so do we. Besides, we already set aside a date on the calendar to get blasted, New Year’s Eve.
We have nothing against St. Patrick’s Day, per se, but we do have ‘issues’ with some of the asinine holidays that clutter up our calendar. Just for fun, we’re going to take a look at some of these recurring speed bumps on our calendar that give us a pain:
We have a day dedicated to a winged runt who terrorizes unsuspecting individuals with his bow and arrows. We think Cupid needs to be ordered to take a long overdue timeout. The only ‘up side’ to this February blight is the fact that some womyn kick Cupid to the curb and devote the day to venerating their nads. I have nothing against these V-Day (Vagina Day) Harpies, aside from the fact that those most likely to celebrate their nads are the ones least likely to share that joy with you, horny as a ten-peckered owl, Sparky.
We have a day dedicated to a directionally challenged Italian - Christopher Columbus - a day that allows the Italians - and Italian wanna bes - to be as annoying as the Irish, and Irish wanna bes, are on St. Patrick’s Day. If there’s a legitimate source of Italian pride, it’s not a man who didn’t know where he was going, didn’t know where he landed, and never accepted the fact that he’d visited ‘the New World’ instead of the Far East. If Italians want to celebrate someone who gives us the warmies for Italians, it should be someone like Sophia Loren or Giada De Laurentiis.
America lumps together the good, the bad, and the ugly, with a generic, one-size-fits,-all "Presidents Day" that opines ‘all Oval Office denizens are created equal’. What a steaming load. Jimmy the Meek, a man who was terrified by a swimming rodent, is one POTUS I’d like to forget. America needs to get real, by honoring the best presidents on their birthday and dumping the losers like a bad habit.
In Colonized parts of America, a faux Mexican holiday - Cinco de Mayo - stains the May calendar. It’s a day venerated by swilling insect-packing adult beverages and doing your best to get Montezuma’s revenge by downing impressive quantities of suitably ethnic eats. Why do we celebrate it? I haven’t got a clue and neither do the folks who live in Mexico, where there’s no such thing as a Cinco de Mayo holiday.
One of the most politically correct days on the calendar is "Administrative Professionals Day". Back in the day, before "secretary" was deemed ‘demeaning’ by the NO-NADs, it was Secretaries Day, which occurred sometime during - TA DA - Secretaries Week. Everything was spiffy, until womyn got their panties in a wad over it and rammed through this change which did not thrill the socks off those office professionals who took great pride in being a ‘secretary’.
Even Mother Earth has her own day, Earth Day, but we hear rumblings that it will be completely transformed to venerate Earth’s foremost - self proclaimed - champion, Messiah Al Gore. Instead of honoring Mother Earth on April 22nd, Messiah Al’s disciples want to change it to March 31st, the day when Messiah Al first stained humanity's skivvies. Move over, Easter.
In these diversity bonkers times, some elements of the Caterwauling Coalition have kicked it up a notch by devoting an entire month to themselves. In addition to the familiar ones - Black History Month, Women’s History Month, and Gay Pride Month - other groups have staked a claim on entire months of the calendar. There’s a Hispanic Pride Month (there’s also a Latino Pride Month), plus that new kid on the block, one devoted to Islamikazes: Islamic Pride Month. Islamic pride? Bite me.
We have days devoted to severely lost Italians, a winged runt, an Irish saint who was - gasp - not Irish (he’s Welsh), a rainbow coalition of the properly-hyphenated and a bogus Mexican holiday, so there is, obviously, work to be done, to make things right. As usual, we have some notions about resolving this deplorable situation.
Channeling our elusive sensitive side, your devoted PIG staff wonders why so many of these blights on our calendar are ‘exclusive’ rather than ‘inclusive’. We think there’s room for improvement. Let’s take, for example, everyone’s favorite, directionally-challenged Italian, Christopher Columbus. If we can dedicate a day to him, why not give that intrepid Polish explorer, Boris The Navigator, equal time?
Boris set forth from Poland looking for a suitable shortcut to Paris, but, due to the fact he was got his east mixed up with his west, Boris ended up in Siberia. Determined to put an end to those vicious jibes about Boris "Wrong Way" Kowalski, Boris set sail for his native Poland and blundered into Alaska, adding a new name to his collection "Klondike Kowalski". We like Boris’s ‘never say die’ spirit and think he deserves his own day on our calendar. At least Boris, unlike Columbus, had the good sense to know where he was when he got there.
We have a Mothers Day, a Fathers Day (AKA ugly tie day) and a Grandparents Day. Thanks to out of control Elected Tormentors, we have 365 days that are "for the children". What we don’t have...what we need, in the worst way, is a Rational Adults Day, to honor those besieged individuals who make what’s left of America work.
We think it’s time to salute those humanitarians who, on a daily basis, give oppressors the will to carry on, when faced with unrelenting caterwauling from the properly-hyphenated. How? PIG wants to spearhead the campaign to make National Sweater Puppy Day a permanent fixture on our calendar. If the womyn can have a day dedicated to their nads, horndogs demand equal time via a National Sweater Puppy Day, with Pam Anderson has our poster wench.
Speaking of oppressors, isn’t it time to dedicate a day to those DWM (dead white males) who inspire, entertain and inform us? Why don’t we celebrate a William Shakespeare Day? Why isn’t a man who gave us the facts on the true nature of the universe honored with a Nicolaus Copernicus Day? Why don’t we honor one of the greatest minds in human history with an Albert Einstein Day? Why don't we devote a day to a great American writer with a Mark Twain Day? Why? Why? Why?
If dead white males aren’t your style, what about some alive and still kicking white males? PIG thinks we need to expand our cultural festivities by honoring our favorite rock band with an AC/DC Appreciation Day. Speaking of inspirational rockers, we REALLY think there needs to be a Motor City Madman Day honoring our top Oval Office choice, Ted "Cat Scratch Fever" Nugent.
PIG also thinks it’s time to get real. From start to finish, our year is littered with days dedicated to supernaturalism. We have no problem with Easter, Yom Kippur, Kwanza, Christmas and assorted other religious observances. We do, however, believe that there’s a pressing need for ‘the rest of the story’. An Objective Reality Day would do the job nicely, since it counterbalances supernaturalist holidays and Messiah Al’s ‘Earth Day’ in one fell swoop.
Last, but far from least, PIG dares to suggest that we set aside at least one day - a whole month would be better - dedicated to political incorrectness. On this day - we think PIG Heritage Day has a nice ring to it - all those annoying P.C. niceties get kicked to the curb and everyone is ‘empowered’ to be as real as they want, need or dare to be.
In other words, on that day - March 1st, our birthday, would be ideal - everyone, from sea to shining sea, would be an honorary PIG staffer. PIG snouts and curly tails are optional, but the PIG Heritage Day kegger and melee would be MANDATORY. Are we that full of ourselves and ‘it’? You better believe it, Sparky.
By now, depending on your pedigree, you’re simmering nicely. If that’s the case, this gloating smirk - GRIN - is for you.
Go ahead, stuck in a rut Sparky, have a happy St. Patrick’s Day.
We promise that we won’t hold it against you.
Guest Commentary
Source: PIG’s E-Mail Inbox
Why Koch Industries Is Speaking Out
By CHARLES G. KOCH
Years of tremendous overspending by federal, state and local governments have brought us face-to-face with an economic crisis. Federal spending will total at least $3.8 trillion this year—double what it was 10 years ago. And unlike in 2001, when there was a small federal surplus, this year's projected budget deficit is more than $1.6 trillion.
Several trillions more in debt have been accumulated by state and local governments. States are looking at a combined total of more than $130 billion in budget shortfalls this year. Next year, they will be in even worse shape as most so-called stimulus payments end.
For many years, I, my family and our company have contributed to a variety of intellectual and political causes working to solve these problems. Because of our activism, we've been vilified by various groups. Despite this criticism, we're determined to keep contributing and standing up for those politicians, like Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who are taking these challenges seriously.
Both Democrats and Republicans have done a poor job of managing our finances. They've raised debt ceilings, floated bond issues, and delayed tough decisions.
Senior Economics Writer Stephen Moore critiques Washington's pending budget deal.
In spite of looming bankruptcy, President Obama and many in Congress have tiptoed around the issue of overspending by suggesting relatively minor cuts in mostly discretionary items. There have been few serious proposals for necessary cuts in military and entitlement programs, even though these account for about three-fourths of all federal spending.
Yes, some House leaders have suggested cutting spending to 2008 levels. But getting back to a balanced budget would mean a return to at least 2003 spending levels—and would still leave us with the problem of paying off our enormous debts.
Federal data indicate how urgently we need reform: The unfunded liabilities of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid already exceed $106 trillion. That's well over $300,000 for every man, woman and child in America (and exceeds the combined value of every U.S. bank account, stock certificate, building and piece of personal or public property).
The Congressional Budget Office has warned that the interest on our federal debt is "poised to skyrocket." Even Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is sounding alarms. Yet the White House insists that substantial spending cuts would hurt the economy and increase unemployment.
Plenty of compelling examples indicate just the opposite. When Canada recently reduced its federal spending to 11.3% of GDP from 17.5% eight years earlier, the economy rebounded and unemployment dropped. By comparison, our federal spending is 25% of GDP.
Government spending on business only aggravates the problem. Too many businesses have successfully lobbied for special favors and treatment by seeking mandates for their products, subsidies (in the form of cash payments from the government), and regulations or tariffs to keep more efficient competitors at bay.
Crony capitalism is much easier than competing in an open market. But it erodes our overall standard of living and stifles entrepreneurs by rewarding the politically favored rather than those who provide what consumers want.
The purpose of business is to efficiently convert resources into products and services that make people's lives better. Businesses that fail to do so should be allowed to go bankrupt rather than be bailed out.
But what about jobs that are lost when businesses go under? It's important to remember that not all jobs are the same. In business, real jobs profitably produce goods and services that people value more highly than their alternatives. Subsidizing inefficient jobs is costly, wastes resources, and weakens our economy.
Because every other company in a given industry is accepting market-distorting programs, Koch companies have had little option but to do so as well, simply to remain competitive and help sustain our 50,000 U.S.-based jobs. However, even when such policies benefit us, we only support the policies that enhance true economic freedom.
For example, because of government mandates, our refining business is essentially obligated to be in the ethanol business. We believe that ethanol—and every other product in the marketplace—should be required to compete on its own merits, without mandates, subsidies or protective tariffs. Such policies only increase the prices of those products, taxes and the cost of many other goods and services.
Our elected officials would do well to remember that the most prosperous countries are those that allow consumers—not governments—to direct the use of resources. Allowing the government to pick winners and losers hurts almost everyone, especially our poorest citizens.
Recent studies show that the poorest 10% of the population living in countries with the greatest economic freedom have 10 times the per capita income of the poorest citizens in countries with the least economic freedom. In other words, society as a whole benefits from greater economic freedom.
Even though it affects our business, as a matter of principle our company has been outspoken in defense of economic freedom. This country would be much better off if every company would do the same. Instead, we see far too many businesses that paint their tails white and run with the antelope.
I am confident that businesses like ours will hire more people and invest in more equipment when our country's financial future looks more promising. Laying the groundwork for smaller, smarter government, especially at the federal level, is going to be tough. But it is essential for getting us back on the path to long-term prosperity.
Organized Tyranny
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts [02/25/11]
[Here’s a triple dose of Hambo prose on the Madison Meltdown, and related matters.]
No Place At The Table
When public employee unions negotiate a contract with the relevant Elected Tormentors, there’s one key player missing: We the People. We're not invited because we're not going to play their game, by their rules.
In theory, both the Elected Tormentors and the public employee unions work for We the People.
In theory, We the People are represented by the Elected Tormentors.
In practice, our only role is opening up our wallet and handing over what we’re coerced into paying.
Confused? Don’t worry about it, I’ll give you the disgusting details:
* We the People have money extorted from us, when the Nanny State invokes its coercive power to impose taxes.
* The Elected Tormentors curry favor with public employee unions by giving them insane salaries, benefits (lavish health care and retirement packages), paid for with looted tax dollars.
* The public employee unions lock in their perks, by using money extorted from the taxpayers to buy - via campaign contributions, plus 'issue' advertisements - union-coddling Elected Tormentors who will steal more taxpayer money to give to their union bosses.
If you do the math, you arrive at an infuriating conclusion. It’s the public employee unions, not the Elected Tormentors, or the chad punching taxpayer, who runs your town, township, county and/or state. They tell the Elected Tormentors what they want, then ORDER We the People to pay for it.
Bottom line: When it comes to public employee unions, We the People don’t have a place at the table. That might not bother you, but it majorly pisses me off.
Fleebaggers
For the record, ‘fleebaggers’ is the name that some clever bloggers pinned on those Demoncrats who go into exile to avoid a painful - you’re not in the majority, Libertard Sparky - reality check. Normally, such dereliction of one’s sworn duty is frowned upon. Normally. But, it’s a different story in the bizarre region of the Twilight Zone inhabited by the ‘progressives’, Commies, Socialists, and Libertards. For Moonbats, running away to another state is - TA DA - courageous.
I keep wondering how long these Fleebaggers from Wisconsin and Indiana can willfully, for the hell of it, stay away, before some rational adult declares the office vacant. If I blew off work for a week or longer, for no good reason, I’d be an unemployment statistic.
If there isn’t already some ‘vacancy’ tripwire, for Elected Tormentors who refuse to do the work the voters hired them to do, there should be. We the People need to get going on that one.
Madison Melee
If you want a preview of the next American Civil War, spend some quality time in Madison, where the likely combatants are already skirmishing. It’s just a matter of time, before the shooting starts and the union sludge knows it. That’s why, in Madison, the forces of organized tyranny (labor unions, especially the public employee unions) are testing their readiness for the coming battle with America’s rational adult taxpayers.
In Madison, and elsewhere, the public employee unions make their attitude painfully clear. They don’t give a rat’s ass if they bankrupt a city, a county, a state, and/or the entire nation. They don’t give a rat’s ass if they impoverish every hard-working fool whose taxes pay for the public employees’ lavish retirement. They don’t give a rat’s ass about anything, except stealing as much of John and Jane Q. Taxpayer’s money as they can, then using it to buy Elected Tormentors who will steal a lot more and give it to these job for life parasites.
It’s only a matter of time before the sovereign individuals who reshaped American politics by creating the Tea Party movement get tired of paying for these parasites who treat us like crap. Any day now, sovereign individuals will be fed up with infuriatingly expensive teachers who spend all their time brainwashing Little Johnny and Little Moonbeam into mind-numbed ATM machines who can’t read, write or do math. When the time comes, We the People will get up off our knees, and declare "Enough is enough". Pushed too far, We the People will square off against the organized tyranny assholes and ‘get bloody’ as that Congresspunk told the union thug rabble, Massachusetts.
Eventually, and we seem to be hurtling toward a point of no return at breakneck speed, the battle of incompatible ideas, will evolve into another kind of battle. This can only end one way. The organized tyranny hammerheads and the sovereign individuals will face each other across a field of battle, where the conflict between liberty and tyranny will be resolved the way it always is: with blood.
The Second American Civil War is headed our way, and if you want to scout the enemy, you’ll find him, her, himher and it in the streets of Madison, in Columbus (Ohio), and Indianapolis (Indiana). In bygone days, I believed the coming American Civil War could be avoided. I’m no longer as certain about that as I was.
Guest Commentary
Source: Our E-Mail [02/18/11]
Transformation of America
Scribbler: Unknown
The Fundamental Transformation of America When Obama wrote a book and said he was mentored as a youth by Frank, (Frank Marshall Davis) an avowed Communist, people said it didn't matter.
When it was discovered that his grandparents, were strong socialists who sent Obama's mother to a socialist school where she was introduced to Frank Marshall Davis. He was later introduced to young Barrack Hussein Obama People said it didn't matter.
When people found out that Barrack Hussein Obama was enrolled as a Muslim child in school and his father and stepfather were both Muslims, people said it didn't matter.
When he wrote in another book he authored "I will stand with them (Muslims) should the political winds shift in an ugly direction" people said it didn't matter.
When he admittedly, in his book, said he chose Marxist friends and professors in college-- people said it didn't matter.
When he traveled to Pakistan , after college on an unknown national passport, people said it didn't matter.
When he sought the endorsement of the Marxist Party in 1996 as he ran for the Illinois Senate, people said it didn't matter.
When he sat in a Chicago Church for twenty years and listened to a preacher spew hatred for America and preach black liberation theology, people said it didn't matter.
When an independent Washington organization, that tracks Senate voting records, gave him the distinctive title as the "most liberal senator," people said it didn't matter.
When the Palestinians in Gaza set up a fund raising telethon to raise money for his election campaign, people said it didn't matter.
When his voting record supported gun control, people said it didn't matter.
When he refused to disclose who donated money to his election campaign, as other candidates had done, people said it didn't matter.
When he received endorsements from people like Louis Farrakhan and Mummar Kadaffi and Hugo Chavez, people said it didn't matter.
When it was pointed out that he was a total newcomer and had absolutely no experience at anything except community organizing, people said it didn't matter.
When he chose friends and acquaintances such as Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn who were revolutionary radicals, people said it didn't matter.
When his voting record in the Illinois senate and in the U.S. Senate came into question, people said it didn't matter.
When he refused to wear a flag, lapel pin, and did so only after a public outcry, people said it didn't matter.
When people started treating him as a Messiah and children in schools were taught to sing his praises, people said it didn't matter.
When he stood with his hands over his groin area for the playing of the National Anthem and Pledge of Allegiance, people said it didn't matter.
When he surrounded himself in the White house with advisors who were pro-gun control, pro- abortion, pro-homosexual marriage and wanting to curtail freedom of speech to silence the opposition people said it didn't matter..
When he aired his views on abortion, homosexuality and a host of other issues, people said it didn't matter.
When he said he favors sex education in Kindergarten, including homosexual indoctrination, people said it didn't matter.
When his personal background was either scrubbed or hidden and nothing could be found about him, people said it didn't matter.
When the place of his birth was called into question, and he refused to produce a birth certificate, people said it didn't matter.
When he had an association in Chicago with Tony Rezco--a man of questionable character and who is now in prison and had helped Obama to a sweet deal on the purchase of his home-- people said it didn't matter.
When it became known that George Soros, a multi-billionaire Marxist, spent a ton of money to get him elected, people said it didn't matter.
When he started appointing White House Czars that were radicals, revolutionaries, and even avowed Marxist/Communist, people said it didn't matter.
When he stood before the Nation and told us that his intentions were to "fundamentally transform this Nation" into something else, people said it didn't matter.
When it became known that he had trained ACORN workers in Chicago and served as an attorney for ACORN, people said it didn't matter.
When he appointed cabinet members and several advisors who were tax cheats and socialists, people said it didn't matter.
When he appointed a Science Czar, John Holdren, who believes in forced abortions, mass sterilizations and seizing babies from teen mothers, people said it didn't matter.
When he appointed Cass Sunstein as Regulatory Czar who believes in "Explicit Consent," harvesting human organs without family consent, and allowing animals to be represented in court, while banning all hunting, people said it didn't matter.
When he appointed Kevin Jennings, a homosexual, and organizer of a group called gay, lesbian, straight, education network as Safe School Czar and it became known that he had a history of bad advice to teenagers, people said it didn't matter.
When he appointed Mark Lloyd, as Diversity Czar, who believes in curtailing free speech; taking from one and giving to another to spread the wealth; who supports Hugo Chavez, people said it didn't matter.
When Valerie Jarrett was selected as Obama's Senior White House Advisor and she is an avowed Socialist, people said it didn't matter.
When Anita Dunn, White House Communications Director said Mao Tse Tung was her favorite philosopher-- and the person she turned to most for inspiration, people said it didn't matter.
When he appointed Carol Browner as Global Warming Czar, and her being a well known socialist working on Cap and trade as the nations largest tax, people said it didn't matter.
When he appointed Van Jones, an ex-con and avowed Communist as Green Energy Czar, who since had to resign when this was made known, people said it didn't matter.
When Tom Daschle, Obama's pick for health and human services secretary could not be confirmed, because he was a tax cheat, people said it didn't matter..
When as President of the United States , he bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , people said it didn't matter.
When he traveled around the world criticizing America and never once talking of her greatness, people said it didn't matter.
When his actions concerning the Middle-East seemed to support the Palestinians over Israel , our long time ally, people said it didn't matter.
When he took American tax dollars to resettle thousands of Palestinians from Gaza to the United States, people said it didn't matter.
When he upset the Europeans by removing plans for a missile defense system against the Russians, people said it didn't matter.
When he played politics in Afghanistan by not sending troops early-on when the Field Commanders said they were necessary to win, people said it didn't matter.
When he started spending us into a debt that was so big we could not pay it off, people said it didn't matter.
When he took a huge spending bill under the guise of stimulus and used it to pay off organizations, unions, and individuals that got him elected, people said it didn't matter.
When he took over insurance companies, car companies, banks, etc., people said it didn't matter.
When he took away student loans from the banks and put it through the government, people said it didn't matter.
When he designed plans to take over the health care system and put it under government control, people said it didn't matter.
When he claimed he was a Christian during the election and tapes were later made public that showed Obama speaking to a Muslim group and 'stating' that he was raised a Muslim; was educated as a Muslim; and that he is still a Muslim-- people said it didn't matter.
When he set into motion a plan to take over the control of all energy in the United States through Cap and Trade, people said it didn't matter.
When he finally completed his transformation of America into a Socialist State , people finally woke up--- but it was too late. Add these up one by one and you get a phenomenal score that points to the fact that Barrack Hussein Obama is determined to turn America into a Marxist-Socialist society.
All of the items in the preceding paragraphs have been put into place. All can be documented very easily. Before you disavow this do an internet search. The last paragraph alone is not yet cast in stone. You and I will write that paragraph. Will it read as above or will it be a more happy ending for most of America ?
If you are an Obama Supporter don't be angry with me because I think Barrack Hussein Obama is a socialist. Far too many facts support he is indeed a Socialist. If you seek the truth you will be richer for it. Don't just belittle the opposition.. Search for the truth. Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Constitutionalists, Libertarians all need to pull together or watch the demise of a free democratic society. Pray for Americans to seek the truth and take action for it will keep us FREE. Our biggest enemy is not China , Russia , North Korea , and Iran our biggest enemies are the progressive politicians in Washington DC, and the Muslim infiltration that is flooding into this country. The government will not help, so we need to do it ourselves.
Hambo’s Rant of the Week
Source: Hambo’s Hammer
"Baby Talk"
The news cycle is one relentless bit of ‘joy’ after another and it’s enough to make a rational adult take his, her, hisher or its mind off the basics.
This great experiment in individual liberty is in trouble, big trouble, but the underlying cause isn’t one of the usual suspects.
Yes, the Ruskies are feeling their oats and Putin is a seriously evil piece of shit.
Yes, Mahmoud al-Gilligan is thisclose to nuking the beanies off Israel, and we’re next on his ‘hit’ list.
Yes, Hugo "Skipper" Chavez is doing his best to bring the Ruskie armed forces into our own back yard.
Yes, the Tiny Tyrant - aided and abetted by his basement boy successor - has finally snapped, abrogated the armistice that ended the Korean War, fast-tracked his nuclear weapons program, and seems poised to restart the Korean War.
Yes, Osama and his merry band of murdering bastards are doing their best to seize control of Pakistan, so he can hit us again, with some liberated Pakistani nukes.
Yes, while Islamikaze nations like Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Yemen are poised to go down like dominos, our top spymaster is so myopic, he thinks the Jihadikazes in the Muslim Brotherhood - prime movers in the on-going uprisings - are just harmless, secular, fuzzballs who like to hear themselves talk.
Yes, the Chinese, who own a large percentage of our debt, are working day and night to destroy this nation conceived in liberty, economically and militarily.
Yes, the economy is in the crapper, a paying job is on the endangered species list, and the Nanny State Nitwits are making things worse, by pissing away your tax dollars on red ink nightmares that will keep We the People in debt, until our Sun burns out.
Yes, the Obama Regime is deliberately trying to enslave us, with Executive Orders, business crippling regulations, and stealthy, bureaucratic, assaults on our freedom of speech.
Yes, the resurgent pachyderm herd on Capitol Hill, which promised to take a meat axe to the bloated federal budget, is ‘trimming’ federal spending with cuticle clippers.
Yes, the same Marxist class warriors who never saw a business they didn’t want to shut down, are cheering on the Red Shed’s Marxist Messiah, while he props up - then seizes control of - one industry after another.
Yes, the hard core lefties - Commie union thugs, socialists, technology hating Greeniacs, & anarchists - are ready, willing, and eager to stage an Egypt-style rebellion right here in the USA.
Yes, America dwelling Islamikazes are giving aid and comfort to our Jihadikaze enemies, while they impose Sharia, an element at a time, right under our noses.
Yes, the Obama Regime’s assault on achievers and rewarding of parasites continues unabated.
Yes, the world is full of armed and dangerous asshats who want us dead.
All of the foregoing things are, regrettably, true, but none of them are the enemy who will bring us down.
We the People - not all of us, but enough of us - are the ones who are undermining this noble experiment in individual liberty. Too many of ‘We the People’ find liberty much too stressful, so they are begging, pleading and scheming to let an egregiously pumped up Nanny State baby them. We saw that play out in the General Election on November 4, 2008.
Too many of ‘We the People’ are sucked in by the political din about class envy that makes them want to impoverish the achievers - the EVIL rich. Dreaming of their cut of the spoils, these class warriors want to give the proceeds of this Nanny State mugging to the chronically needy parasites. Earning money for yourself is too hard, the looters whine. I want my Big Bad Daddy to steal what I need then give me everything I want, without all that nasty work. That’s the essence of Messiah Barry’s popularity.
Too many of ‘We the People’ cheer when Nanny State nitwits save chronic losers from themselves, by infringing on the rights of food wrangling capitalists. Too many of ‘We the People’ don’t understand that a wide load’s self-destructive eating habits are NOT any of the Nanny State’s damn business. It might make these sickeningly smug do-gooders feel good to FORCE food wranglers to post nutritional information, but it won’t get the job done. At most, it might make some nagged to death lard ass order a diet coke with his THIRD heart attack on a bun. I don’t want everybody to decide what’s good to eat, the lard ass babies whine. I want my Big Bad Daddy to make all the bad food just go away.
Too damn many of ‘We the People’ think it’s Uncle Sam’s job to ‘balance’ the viewpoints presented on the ‘airwaves’. Those questioned in a Rasmussen poll showed a shocking enthusiasm for flushing the First Amendment down the crapper. A staggering 47 percent believed the government should require stations to "balance" the political viewpoint expressed over the airwaves. This impulse to silence speech that ‘We the People’ don’t want to hear isn’t confined to the airwaves. At least 31 percent opined that Uncle Sam should be empowered to apply this fairness doctrine muzzle in cyberspace. That’s right, blog punk Sparky. They want to shut you, all of us, up, too. They say things that make me feel bad, the babies whine, I want my Big Bad Daddy to make them all just shut up.
Too damn many of ‘We the People’ are willing to blame ‘evil’, ‘greedy’, capitalists for the spiraling energy prices. ‘We the People’ are eager to complain about $4 a gallon gas, but we’re annoyingly silent when it comes to a Red Shed energy policy which systematically, deliberately, shuts down all access to our domestic energy resources. ‘We the People’ need to stop whining about the symptom - high energy prices - and focus on the root cause - the artificial limiting of our energy supply by the Obama Regime.
I want ‘We the People’ to pull their heads out of their butts. I want ‘We the People’ to stop whining for Big Bad Daddy. I want ‘We the People’ to remember the real meaning of ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’.
* It’s your life, ‘We the People’ Sparky, but you’re the only one who can LIVE it.
* It’s your liberty, ‘We the People’ Sparky, but you’re the one who must exercise, and vigorously defend, it.
* It’s your happiness, ‘We the People’ Sparky, but you’re the one who has to pursue it.
It’s not the government’s job to hand you life, liberty and happiness on a silver platter. It’s the government’s job to keep everyone the hell out of your way, while YOU take care of that pressing life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness business.
Stop being a bunch of crybabies, America. Don’t make me come over there.
America's No-fault Society
Source: Pagan Scribbler Rhetorical Rampage
Due to the losers, users, and pontificating punks who gravitate to positions of power in the Great American Nanny State, this land conceived in liberty is saddled with a relentlessly increasing mass of societal dead weight. The rugged individuals who built this great nation have been overwhelmed by legions of pampered pests who thrive in what I call America’s No Fault Society.
The following celebrity justice examples are the kind of items that triggered my trip down this pagan scribbler road:
Example: A former child star turned drunken, drug addicted, slut jumps in somebody else’s car without permission, and engages in a high speed pursuit of another car through the streets of Los Angeles. When she's finally caught, she's differently-sober and is found with cocaine in her pockets.
Due to the fact that she's a former child star, the prosecutors drop all the felony charges and give her a wrist slap for some misdemeanor offenses. At most, she'll spend 24 hours in a graybar, pay a fine, make some 'appearances' at a community service endeavor for 10 hours, and sleep through some mandatory rehab sessions.
[Since her initial header in to the justice system, Lilo has demonstrated that, for her, they haven’t built a Graybar, or rehab center, strong enough to hold her.]
When all is said and done, Lindsey Lohan will have proven that she had it right when she said, "I'm Lindsey Lohan and I can do anything I want." Lindsey knows, and the justice system has proved, that, for her, there is no piper to pay, no adverse consequences to face, no matter what she does. She's the poster slut of America's No Fault Society.
Example: A reality show star, whose only claim to fame is a famous show business father, gets roaring drunk and goes motoring down the freeway, driving in the WRONG DIRECTION. Eventually, she simply stops her car on the freeway and sits there.
Although the requisite court sentenced her to some graybar time, she barely had time to unpack her gear because her entire graybar gig lasted a daunting - I am not making this up - 82 MINUTES.
When all is said and done, Nicole Richie has demonstrated that even if your notoriety is being the daughter of a star, there is no piper to pay, not adverse consequences to face, no matter what she does.
The ‘no fault’ mindset is also in play, on a couple of headline grabbing stories which involved a lone gunman who mowed down numerous individuals, many of whom were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Example: You’re 22-year-old basement boy who is severely, clinically, bonkers. During a chance encounter with a local politician, Gabrielle Giffords, you feel ‘insulted’ when she doesn’t respond to your demented ravings. After letting your hostility fester into hatred, for 3 years, you arm yourself with a Glock. Armed and dangerous, you take your firepower to a Gabrielle Giffords ‘meet and greet’ at a local supermarket, where you gun down 19 people, including Congresswench Giffords. Six of your victims die, and Gabrielle Giffords is left with serious brain damage from the bullet you fired into it.
Despite basement boy’s unquestionable guilt, the ‘no fault’ excuse makers rush to Jared Loughner’s defense, by blaming his murderous rampage on Sarah Palin and her crosshairs graphic. Far from finished, they also blame El Rushbo, Glenn Beck, and assorted other VRWC babblers, whose lack of civility compelled Jared to pull the trigger on that infamous January day. According to this ‘no fault’ nitwitdom, Jared isn’t a crazy bastard with a gun; he’s a victim of VRWC rhetoric. Under prevailing ‘no fault’ rules, We the People probably owe him an apology. Will he pay the piper? Will he face consequences? The answer to both is ‘maybe’, BUT, in this ‘no fault’ era, the price he pays, the consequences he faces, will NOT be as harsh as his rampage deserves.
Example: You’re an American Mecca Maniac who is a Major in the U.S. Army. On November 5, 2009, you set aside your assigned work as a shrink, at Fort Hood, Texas, to deal with a more pressing issue. At 13: 34 hours, you head for an on-base medical facility called the Soldier Readiness Center, where you shout "Allah akbar", while you start gunning down your fellow soldiers. By the time some bullets end your rampage, you’ve killed 13 individuals and wounded 29 others.
Major Nidal Malik Hasan’s guilt is beyond dispute. Predictably, that doesn’t stop the ‘no fault’ fatheads from blaming an obvious act of terrorism on job related stress which was caused by rampant American Islamophobia. According to the ‘no fault’ mantra, this murdering bastard was oppressed into his murderous rampage. Will he pay the piper? Will he face consequences? The answer to both is, once again, ‘maybe’, BUT, in this ‘no fault’ era, the price he pays, the consequences he faces, will NOT be as harsh as his rampage deserves.
The following examples show how this ‘no fault’ brainfart has expanded into other segments of American society:
Example: You're a chronically needy, disease ridden, denizen of a country that makes a tidy sum by exporting its poverty. You succumb to the Siren song wafting across the border and invade a neighboring country, uninvited. You work for a capitalist who pays you slave wages, under the table. You drop one or more anchor babies who will suck up goods and services that are paid for by the American taxpayer. You are, despite all the bloviating about 'doing jobs that Americans won't do', a parasite who is in America illegally.
Eventually, when you and your border jumping home boys and girls achieve critical mass, you are given amnesty and put on the fast track to citizenship. Despite your negative impact on the USA, you are rewarded and given all the proof you need, that there is no piper you need to pay, no adverse consequences for your actions, no matter what you do. On the contrary, you've been rewarded for invading a sovereign nation and ripping off its taxpayers.
Example: You're an inmate in one of America's government cess-schools. You can't read. You wouldn't recognize simple addition if it fell on you and your writing skills are limited to scrawling your name which you invariably misspell. Your only meaningful accomplishment is contributing to the head count that entitles the cess-school to tap into taxpayer funded Nanny State coffers.
Despite your utter and complete inability to read, write or compute, you're a happy camper because you know that none of it matters. You're going to get that high school diploma anyway, because you're the icon of public Edcrap in America, an idiot with self-esteem. Your teachers managed to teach you that one 'essential' lesson: for you there's no piper to pay, no adverse consequences for your actions, no matter what you do (or don't do).
Example: You're a state Legicrat in the no longer 'golden' state. You squander the taxpayers’ money on asinine bull crap that appeals to your deep pocketed campaign contributors, knowing full well that you're shafting John and Jane Q. Public. Your spending spree created a financial black hole that has an insatiable appetite for dead presidents, and your 'best' solution involves borrowing billions of dollars more. Your neo-Marxist antics chase businesses and rational adults out of the state in ever increasing numbers. If anyone starts asking the wrong questions, you've covered your tracks through accounting sheet trickery to paper over that fiscal black hole.
Despite your miserable performance, you're sitting pretty because, thanks to a self-serving redistricting scheme, every seat in the state legislature is a safe seat. You've successfully rigged the game to exempt yourself from voter outrage. You have proven, conclusively, that, no matter how deleterious your actions are, when it comes to inalienable individual liberty, there's no piper to pay, no adverse consequences for your liberty-nuking actions, no matter how egregiously you stick it to the taxpayer.
Example: Your butt looks like the southern exposure of a northbound hippo and you need a supercomputer to add up your daily calorie intake. When you plod out to the refrigerator, the shock waves set off seismometers on Jupiter. You're such a notorious wide load you've been banned from every 'all you can eat' outpost from sea to shining sea.
Despite your gastronomic excesses, you're feeling pretty smug because that trial lawyer piece of crap just added your overstuffed butt to that class action lawsuit against 'big food'. Enrichment looms on the horizon as soon as your shyster finishes fleecing those deep 'big food' pockets. Food Nazis and their irrational obsession with transfat, et al, have proven, conclusively, that it's not your fault. There's no piper to pay as long as trial lawyers and Food Nazis have your ample back, and, thanks to them, there are no adverse consequences for your actions. For your lard ass, the good news never stops because, there’s a 50-50 chance that you can stick the taxpayer with all your obesity-related medical bills.
It’s time for America’s rational adults to take charge. It’s time to tell these pampered pests that childhood is OVER. It’s time to tell them to grow the hell up. It’s time to dismantle the safety nets, cut these no fault umbilical cords and tell every-damn-body that henceforth they will be held fully accountable for their actions. No excuses, no exceptions.
Guest Commentary
Source: Some PIGster
[DISCLAIMER: We the PIGs won’t swear on a stack of pizza boxes that Colonel Bob Pappas exists. Furthermore, We the PIGs won’t swear on a stack of pizza boxes that, if Colonel Bob Pappas does exist, he wrote the following rant. We the PIGs will state, for the official record, that whoever wrote this rant, NAILED IT. It’s here because of what it says, not because of the person who ‘allegedly’ said it.]
Forwarded for your info. Col. Pappas speaks his mind.
Dear Mr. Vice President
by Colonel Bob Pappas, USMC, Retired
Thank you for your email below in which you enumerate yours and Obama's accomplishments;
Indeed you and Mr. Obama have kept your promises, you should be "d___m" proud because, "it's a big "f___k___g deal;" and we want to "thank" you;
Thanks for spreading "poverty" around;
Thanks for your personal, loyal and unwavering support of a demonstrably mentally ill, narcissist;
Thanks for your integrity in not insisting that BHO be Constitutionally qualified for the job;
Thanks for massive militarily budget cuts; we need to cut the military industrial complex down to size;
Thanks for BHO's apology tour;
Thanks for for not closing the border with Mexico and keeping the doors open so that illegal immigrants can take US jobs;
Thanks for providing health care, educational benefits, unemployment benefits and housing for illegal immigrants; I enjoy paying the added taxes that are required;
Thanks for trying to make illegal immigrants citizens so you can garner their votes;
Thanks for denigrating, marginalizing and destroying your own country; it makes us all soooo proud and it feels oh, soooo good!
Thanks for alienating our friends and embracing our enemies; Churchill was indeed a "vile" ally during WWII;
Thanks for implementing Hitler's genetic research projects, we knew all along he was right;
Thanks for intentionally crushing the strongest economy in the world;
Thanks for devaluing my earnings; keep running those printing presses;
Thanks for increasing the cost of gasoline by 100% in two years; really helps me and the poor get around a lot easier than when the price was lower;
Thanks for 17% real unemployment;
Thanks for crushing the value of my home; its worth about half of what it was when you took office; I'm sure that has helped the poor too;
Thanks for increasing the national debt in two years more than all other Administrations combined in the history of the country;
Thanks for blaming G.W. Bush for everything; Right On! Always knew that the Skull and Cross Bones Society was not to be trusted, but ACORN is;
Thanks for imposing onerous taxes via the back door;
Thanks for closing Guantanamo; Oh? You didn't?
Thanks for moving terrorist trials to New York where they can grandstand and taking them out of the hands of the incompetent military;
Thanks for relieving McCrystal, he deserved it for supporting you and carrying out your insane rules of engagement;
Thanks for watching while Iraq descends into chaos; great that you kept your word on withdrawal, no matter the consequences;
Thanks for the increasing American casualties in Afghanistan, gotta spread the casualties around, ya know;
Thanks for embracing Islam while eschewing Christianity;
Thanks for Obama's religious head fake, going to church;
Thanks for the Administrations "rebranding" efforts; albeit a snake is a snake;
Thanks for the most corrupt "stimulus" administration in history;
Thanks for supporting BHO's lack of personal transparency;
Thanks for "bringing the U.S. down a notch or two;" U.S. "imperialist" objectives just had to be reined in;
Thanks for divulging U.S. interrogation techniques;
Thanks for "shutting down" "rendition;"
Thanks for imposing your version of healthy relationships, perverted sex upon the Armed Forces;
Thanks for not making perverted sex mandatory for members of the Armed Forces;
Thanks for opening the door, via repeal of DADT for the oxymoron of "perverted sex marriage;"
Thanks for backdooring legislation and end - running the Congress through regulation and Executive Orders;
Thanks for trying to force all workers to join unions; that would definitely make the US more competitive in the Global economy;
Thanks for keeping the "hated" Patriot Act in place;
Thanks for keeping Bush's "tax cuts for the rich;"
Thanks for the massive payoffs to Wall Street , Union thugs and public service unions;
Thanks for stabbing Israel in the back;
Thanks for embarcing one of the most vile governments with arguably the worst human rights record in the history the world at the recent State Dinner; it makes us proud;
Thanks for politicizing every facet of government;
Thanks for telling us what we can eat, how we should live and what life vocation we should pursue;
Thanks for sharing via Obama your vast knowledge of world events, economics, international relations; that's always comedy hour, and it's good for a laugh;
Thanks for destroying the finest health care system in the world; doing so really helps Obama's relatives in Kenya and the poor here in America;
Thanks for the foolishness, the racism, the hatred, the divisiveness you and Barrack Hussein Obama have generated and fostered; it's sooo good for America;
Thanks for your support of Obama's million dollar vacations, hitting the political jackpot and living the good life that comes from the bottomless well of gold at taxpayer expense;
Thanks for killing the goose that laid the golden egg, the free market economy with yours and Obama's onerous regulations; (seriously-not that some are not needed)
These were yours and Obama's promises: to totally change America, to totally change the economic system, and to totally change the world;
Congratulations Mr. Vice President, you, BHO, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, George Soros and your other anti-American allies have succeeded where no other country could!
These things noted, you have at the least succeeded in training BHO to wear a flag of the US on his lapel, that is , unless on the back side thereof there are engraved, crossed fingers.
Ah, yes! Americans look forward to crushing you in 2012, as in 2010! We can hardly wait, unless a chance for impeachment comes forth!
All the while I thought your name was just plain "Joe" but now that we know you better, a name would be Benedict, as in Arnold!
Is there such a thing as a Seditious President and Vice President?
Semper Fidelis
Guest Commentary
Source: Some PIGster
[We don’t know who wrote this, and that’s a shame. Reputedly, it appeared in the Charleston (West Virginia?) Daily Mail. Whoever wrote it nailed it, in PIG-worthy style.]
I do not want civil discourse
For a decade, from the election of Bush 43 forward, the Left has lied and cheated as it tried to return to power. Al Gore made a mockery out of the American electoral system by being a spoilsport over Florida, which Bush indeed won by 537 votes. Dan Rather forged a document to try to derail Bush’s re-election. Twice Democrats stole U.S. senators from the Republicans. After voting to support the war to get by the 2002 election, many Democrats quickly soured on the war. The profane protests were cheered by liberals who misattributed “dissent is the highest form of patriotism”to Thomas Jefferson; the words belong to the late historian Howard Zinn.
Once in power, liberals were the opposite of gracious.
For two years now, I have been called ignorant, racist, angry and violent by the left. The very foul-mouthed protesters of Bush dare to now label my words as “hate speech.”
Last week, the left quickly blamed the right for the national tragedy of a shooting spree by a madman who never watched
Fox News, never listened to Rush Limbaugh and likely did not know who Sarah Palin is.
Fortunately, the American public rejected out of hand that idiotic notion that the right was responsible.
Rather than apologize, the left wants to change the tone of the political debate.
The left suddenly wants civil discourse.
Bite me.
The left wants to play games of semantics.
Bite me.
The left wants us to be civil — after being so uncivil for a decade.
Bite me.
There is grown-up work to do now. Liberals ran up the federal credit card, destroyed the American medical system and undermined the rule of law — which is the foundation of capitalism — with a bunch of unconstitutional fiats from the president and his bureaucracy.
The economy is a mess. The president “inherited” a 7.6% unemployment rate. It’s now 9.4% — after we spent a record $787 billion on a stimulus.
I was not consulted on that stimulus. I had a very good argument against it. I said the money supply was too large and printing more money would fail. I said let the economic downturn run its course.
Lefties were too busy celebrating the 2008 election to listen.
When people protested lefties made vulgar remarks about tea-bagging and giggled.
So screw you and your civil discourse.
I don’t want to hear it.
I have been screamed at for 10 years.
It’s my turn now. I am not going to scream back. But I refuse to allow anyone to dictate what I say or how I say it. I refuse to allow the same foul-mouthed, foul-spirited foul people who dumped on me to now try to tell me what I may or may not say.
My free speech matters more than the feelings of anyone on the left. You don’t like what I say? Tough.
I will not allow people to label my words Hate Speech or try to lecture me on civility. I saw the lefty signs. The left’s definition of civil discourse is surreal.
We have a terribly unfit president who has expanded government control beyond not only what is constitutional but what is healthy for our freedom.
Indeed, this call for civil discourse is itself a direct threat to my free speech.
So screw you.
You don’t like my words? You don’t like my tone? You feel threatened?
Too bad.
No.
Actually, that is what I want. I want the lefties to feel bad. I want them to feel hurt. I want them to cry to their mommies.
That way the field will be cleared so we grown-ups can fix the nation and the economy. If you can’t put up with a little excrement, get the hell out of the barn.
Guest Commentary
Source: Old Frank [01/13/11]
Citizens Really Need to Read Some American History
Dear Friends and Colleagues:
A lot (far too much actually) has been made of vigorous political discourse that is now often characterized as “hate” speech. The complainers seem to long for a golden age, some earlier time in American history, when all was sweetness and light. However, in truth -- with the possible exception of the period from December 7, 1941 through early August 1945 – no such golden age ever existed.
There are many excellent biographies of our national leaders that should be required reading. These books clearly show that even from the earliest days of our republic, our political leaders have been mercilessly caricatured, libled, and vilified by their opponents. Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, and even the near-sainted father of our country, George Washington himself, were targets of vitriol, distortions, rumors, and outright lies. In fact, Thomas Jefferson (who was Washington’s Secretary of State at the time) wrote some of the most damaging and libelous tirades against his boss, using a variety of aliases. President Jackson was viciously attacked in print and on the stump. Abe Lincoln was called an “Ape” and “ugly” and even the wives of presidents were subjected to strident criticism and continual sniping. It’s all there for any citizen to read about, if they even cared to become better informed. It wasn’t pretty then and it isn’t pretty now; but, every politician knows that it comes with the territory. As Harry Truman famously remarked, ‘..If you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.”
In the final analysis, political criticism is neither new nor more volatile today than it was throughout the whole of the 222 years of our republic. To ascribe murderous acts of a lone madman to an atmosphere of charged and vigorous political debate is nonsense. And to tie the latest murderous rampage by a deranged 22 year old Arizonan to the second amendment is even more foolish. Recall please that throughout the same history referred above, the second amendment was in force and that every frontier homestead had firearms to protect against Indian raids, wild animals, and for hunting game. Voters at the time drank whiskey and brawled on election day, but they hardly ever shot the politicians they disagreed with. The father of the nine year old victim of this recent tragedy said it best, noting that we live in a country where a deranged person can do irreparable harm to others, but he wouldn’t have it any other way.
Old Frank
Hambo Rant of the Week
Source: Hambo’s Hammer [01/12/11]
An American Riddle
Do you recognize us? Perhaps a few hints will prod your dormant gray cells:
* We fill a need felt by millions of Americans.
* We’re here in large numbers, throughout the USA, and you know it.
* You do your best to find us, and manage to catch a few, but most of us elude you.
* Millions more are either on the way or soon will be, but try as you might, you can’t stop them.
* You attempt to stop us at the source, but international cooperation is half-hearted at best, because our presence in the USA benefits numerous foreign economies.
* Some hacks and assorted ‘activists’ propose that you give up your decades long fight and legitimize us.
* Legalizing us would greatly benefit your economy, allowing us to donate tax money to offset our drain on public coffers.
* Legalizing us would cut down on crime directly associated with us and decrease the collateral damage done to innocent bystanders.
* We’re frequently discussed on Vast right-wingnut talk radio.
Do you know who we are yet? You probably think you do, but there’s a 50-50 chance that you’re wrong. Need another hint? Okay...
* You might think we’re illegal aliens since all of the hints apply to them, too, but you’re wrong.
For the correct answer, read the next item...
Quixotean Quests
Uncle Sam’s minions always deem meaningful immigration law enforcement so impossible that it’s not worth the effort. ‘How can we find and deport 20 million illegals?’ ‘How can we effectively guard our vast borders?’ It’s impossible, they insist, so instead, we’ll legalize border jumpers...legalize border jumping. Bold new concept.
It’s curious - and then some - that this lost cause excuse is perpetrated by the same hacks who persist in a decades long Federal Quixotean Quest to snuff out the illegal drug trade. The least these hacks can do is conduct the War On Illegal Immigration with the same damn-the-torpedoes zeal that they prosecute the War On Illegal Drugs.
If it’s impossible to stop illegals from crossing our borders, it’s 1000 times harder to keep out easily disguised drugs. Why is the War On Drugs fought so frantically and the War On Illegal Immigration isn’t?
If sheer numbers - of alleged humans - comprise the ultimate criteria for an unconditional War on Illegal Immigration surrender, why do the Feds persist in the Drug War when the illegal drug trade involves millions of Americans, from sea to shining sea?
If American consumer need is an essential factor justifying legalizing border jumping, how do the Fed drug Nazis rationalize their Drug War when millions of American drug consumers take great risks - physical and financial risks - to buy their illicit fix?
If legalizing border jumpers is validated by the way it strengthens our national economy, then they must favor legalizing drugs, too, on the same basis. A legalized drug trade would add billions to our GNP, so why don’t we hear the Lapdog or his minions sending up a drug legalization trial balloon?
If in feverish hack minds the War on Drugs - a losing battle, big damn time - is worth the effort and expense, then so is the War on Illegal Immigration. Allegedly, legalizing our border jumpers gives Uncle Sam greater control, cuts illegal immigration-related crime, and enhances American security. Perhaps...But, legalizing ‘illegal’ drugs would accomplish these things, too, to a much greater extent.
As long as hacks tilt the Drug War windmill, American taxpayers must demand equal Federal zeal in the fight to secure our borders. By their own actions in the Drug War, the Feds tacitly admit that ‘unwinnable’ is not a valid excuse. What we need to do is turn the DEA goon squads loose on America’s illegal aliens. It’s not fair to let drug dealers hog all this fun.
Assorted Pieces of Hambo’s Mind
Source: Hambo’s Hammer [01/08/11]
Item: PC
(A regular reader sent us a missive which proclaimed that the libertard moonbats have NOT cornered the market when it comes to perpetrating Political Correctness. He is, as many of you know, preaching to the choir, but I didn’t mind. It gave me an excuse to vent on right-wingnut political correctness. The following prose is the pertinent portion of my response.)
When I cut through all the crap and get to the bare facts, I conclude that political correctness is built upon the erroneous contention that an individual has an inherent right not to be offended. It's a brain fart that is NOT limited to those on the political left. In fact, when it comes to invoking this mythical 'right' that shields an individual from being offended, the right-wingnuts invoke it at least as much - probably more - than those on the left. Their mantra goes something like this:
"You can't say that, because I don't want to hear it."
"You can't show/do that, because I don't want to see it."
"You can't write that, because I don't want to read it."
"You can't teach that (Evolution, for example), because I don't what to know it."
"You can't pair off with him, her, himher, or it, because it offends my suffocating supernaturalism."
If there's a distinction between right-wingnut Korrectness and lefty moonbat Korrectness it's this:
By invoking political correctness, the lefty is saying, in essence: SHUT UP, MORON!
By invoking political correctness, the righty is saying, in essence: REPENT SINNER.
By rejecting these attempts to dictate elements of my life, I am saying: BITE ME!
Item: Labels
If your political philosophy defies conventional labels, you're obviously doing something right. I have an aversion to labels, since it allows others to dismiss and/or pigeonhole you as "oh, you're one of THEM". By rejecting a conventional label you force whomever to deal with you, the individual. Among other things, it makes someone put in the quality time to learn what you believe and why you believe it. I call those encounters "bestowing enlightenment".
Item: The murdering rat bastard in Tucson
By now, you’re all familiar with the events, so I’ll forego a repetition of the details. What interested me, was/is/shall continue to be the blame game.
A few decades ago, the fickle finger of media blame would cite:
* Society as a whole.
* America’s gun culture.
* A crappy childhood.
The bottom line is usually a steaming load that his murder spree is, in reality, a cry for help.
Fast forward to the present and we have a new set of culprits:
* Sarah Palin, because she had a cross hair graphic on her cyberspace speed bump which targeted Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords’ district.
* The Tea Party patriots. There’s no connection, yet, but that doesn’t keep them from trying to find one.
* The Pima County Sheriff impugned unnamed, vitriolic, individuals - Fox News, Rush, and the VRWC boom box hosts, no doubt - who whipped We the People up in to a table pounding frenzy. The shooter - an atheist, and an anarchist - was manipulated into acting out his rage.
Then, or now, the verdict is always the same: everybody else is to blame for the shooter’s murder spree except for the shooter. He, she, heshe, or it is - TA DA - a VICTIM.
Item: ‘Level Playing Field’
I was in my Paganmobile, with the radio on just for some noise, when Medved blundered into one of my hot buttons: "level playing field". As usual, he got on my last raw nerve, but that seems to be Medved’s primary purpose in life.
Medved obsessed on the fact that life, by it’s very nature, is ‘unfair’. He’s preaching to the choir, on that score, since that fact of existence is enshrined in our PIG Doctrine. Life’s inherent unfairness begins with the random - chaotic - distribution of physical attributes, skills, and intellectual capacity. Some are blessed that way, while others are merely mortal. Life’s inherent unfairness is amplified by the ‘luck of the draw’ nature of the environment into which each of us is born. Does all that mean some are fast tracked for ‘success’ while others are in the slow boat to nowhere? Not necessarily.
What, if anything, does life’s inherent unfairness have to do with a level playing field? It’s not as much as you think, nor are they as inexorably linked as Medved implied.
The leveling of the playing field, involves an equality of opportunity, not an equality of results (AKA ‘fairness’). That means making the Nanny State’s social engineers butt the hell out, because the only way for the playing field to get leveled involves removing all the artificial barriers. With the barriers gone, and the Nanny State out of the picture, each individual has the opportunity to go as far, and as high, as his, her, hisher, or its energy and intellect will take them.
When the playing field is ‘leveled’ by the removal of all barriers, the ‘beneficiaries’ of life’s inherent unfairness aren’t automatically guaranteed success, nor are those to whom life dealt a tough hand, doomed to failure. It’s not what you were issued at birth, or what kind of environment that awaits you when you’re born. Success is driven by what you do with it: your motivation, your work ethic, your character.
I’ll let you explain all this to Medved.
Item: The Cross in San Diego
Once again, I had the radio on for noise, when the host strayed into a pagan hot button. Eventually, after the requisite pummeling of activist judges, the VRWC host painted a bull’s-eye on the atheist who initiated the legal action. I get that, up to a point, because, based on the articles I perused, the prime mover sounds like that pernicious pest, the evangelizing atheist.
Full of smugly sanctimonious, holy roller, fervor, the VRWC host plunged into righteous rhetoric which was replete with annoyingly erroneous assertions. I won’t bore you with a rundown. Instead, I’ll simply deploy a few elements of objective reality which relate, more or less, to this topic.
* The Cross crisis boils down to property rights. Since it’s on public land, each member of that ‘public’ has a right to sound off on how the Nanny State is spending their money. I call this the ‘not on my dime’ factor.
* There is no religious litmus test for American citizenship. That’s the kind of crap that makes Islamikaze nations around the world notorious outposts of tyranny.
* Contrary to what this VRWC vixen spewed, ALL atheists are NOT Libertards, Demoncrats, or any other flavor of Rabid Lefty Moonbat. Many of them are unrepentant sovereign individuals whose politics is solidly on the RIGHT wing of the political spectrum.
* Contrary to what this VRWC vixen spewed, ALL Cross Cultists are NOT conservatives. In fact, many of them are - GASP - hard core lefties.
I get the ‘not on my dime’ argument. I’m down with it, on an endless variety of subjects. Maybe that’s why I’m inclined to give the Cross in San Diego - along with other similar deployments of the cross - a pass, when it comes to ‘not on my dime’.
When it comes to these memorials on public land that are marked with a cross, I tend to view them in a ‘non religious’ context. To me, the cross on these memorials - including those roadside crosses - is a ‘generic’, ‘cultural’ icon which tells me: someone died and we’d like you to take a brief moment out of your life to acknowledge, and honor, them.
When I cut to the chase, these cross memorials, and the legal wrangling that envelops them, aren’t about "we’re a Christian nation". They’re not about "those damn atheists aren’t REAL Americans". They’re not about some chronically offended asshat who thinks he, she, heshe, or it has a right that protects him, her, himher, or it from being offended. They’re not about church vs state. They’re about showing a little respect for someone - warrior(s) in this case - who died. I’d explain that to the VRWC vixen, but she’s a hammerhead who thinks everything is a nail that needs to be pounded into submission. So be it.
A PIGish Report Card
Source: Hambo’s Hammer
In January 2010 we served up a Top Story that was part wish list ("What We’d Like To See") and part prognostication ("What We Expected To See"). Today, just for the hell of it, I’ll boldly go where few others dare to go. I’m going to assess the outcome of our wishes and prognostications.
Item 1:
What We’d Like to See: Chris ‘The Tingler’ Matthews wearing his corset and garterbelt outfit, when he’s perp walked out of the Red Shed, after trying to consummate his unrequited ‘Take Me Barry’ lust.
What We Expect to See: More televised heavy breathing and pathetic pining, by this pimple on humanity’s butt.
Outcome: No corset. No ‘Chris Matthews arrested for stalking Barack Obama’. Lots of leg tingling and heavy breathing. We nailed this one.
Item 2:
What We’d Like to See: The Elephant Clan growing a spine and a robust pair of balls, then taking the fight to the Demoncrat Marxists like our life, liberty and property depended on it.
What We Expect to See: A group of spineless weasels who think that ‘we told you they suck more than we do’ will get ‘er done, again.
Outcome: We don’t detect any growth in the nether regions of the Elephant Clan and the spines are on backorder. The only reason they retook the House is because the Tea Party came along and changed the political landscape. BUT, there were brief glimmers, so I'll give them credit for 'slightly' exceeding our expectations.
Item 3:
What We’d Like to See: A mid-term election wherein We the People reassert our properly-Constitutional control over our own government.
What We Expect to See: The most infamous outburst of Demoncrat-inspired voter fraud in American history.
Outcome: The voter fraud wasn’t as blatant, or as widespread as 2008, and it didn’t impact the outcome. Harry Reid won, by blatantly breaking the election rules, but I don’t count that as fraud, just old fashioned corruption. By and large, thanks to the Tea Party Movement, we got, in large part, what we wished, a revival of We the People.
Item 4:
What We’d Like to See: A News Nitwit moment of clarity, wherein they, belatedly, admit that Dumbo-eared ‘Emperor’ is fraud who ‘has no clothes’, when it comes to meaningful POTUS qualifications.
What We Expect to See: Unrelenting media fawning over the most putrid piece of political shit who ever occupied the Red Shed’s Oval Office.
Outcome: For a brief period, right after the mid-terms, some of the media had a moment of clarity, during which they questioned The One. By the end of the year, thanks to the pachyderm punks’ pathetic performance during the Lame Duck session, the media was fawning all over Prompter Punk, hailing him as ‘the comeback kid’. Expectations met.
Item 5:
What We’d Like to See: A profoundly sincere apology from the punks running the Hysteria Channel (the so-called ‘History’ Channel) for insulting our intelligence with those steaming ‘Mayan Doomsday - December 21, 2012' loads, plus all that recycled Nostradamus sez bullshit.
What We Expect to See: A heavily armed Professor of Piety - PIGster J - going publically postal, now that this blight on the cable television dial has stomped on his last raw nerve with their 2012 Doomsday assault on his sanity.
Outcome: The Hysteria Channel is still pumping out the same sludge, but, to our profound disappointment, PIGster J, didn’t have a memorable, headline grabbing meltdown. We the PIGs got shut out on both ends of this one.
Item 6:
What We’d Like to See: Laugh-inducing images of a tragic San Fran Nan whose face shattered during a globally-warmed blizzard.
What We Expect to See: That infuriating Botox Bitch sneer, each time the 111th Congress poops out each new Marxist Legicrap turd.
Outcome: We nailed this one with our expectations, because Botox Bitch sneered her way through all of 2010, even after she lost her House majority. Sometimes being right really SUCKS.
Item 7:
What We’d Like to See: The Capitol Hill Clown Posse facing the fact that our nation needs to be defended from border jumping scumbag invaders. We want to see them realize that repeating past mistakes with ANOTHER amnesty is a horrendously bad idea.
What We Expect to See: The Obamunist Demoncrats expanding their parasite-infested 'voter base’ with a universal amnesty that confers instant citizenship on the chronically needy, disease-spreading, crime-infested invaders who are turning this nation that was conceived in liberty into a third world cess pool.
Outcome: We nailed it with our expectations. As expected, the Demoncrats tried to ram though Amnesty Light - the DREAM Act - during the Lame Duck debacle. It failed, narrowly, because some Demoncrats voted against it, hoping it would shield them from voter retribution in the 2012 election.
Item 8:
What We’d Like to See: Elected Tormentors who cut the crap and start downsizing government to match those functions clearly defined in the United States Constitution.
What We Expect to See: An endless series of fetid, 111th Congress, Nanny State bloating, frontal assaults on our inalienable individual liberty by Marxist, Elected Tormentor traitors.
Outcome: We expected runaway Nanny State growth, but we never anticipated anything as ruinous to our nation as THIS.
Item 9:
What We’d Like to See: A belated, but essential, admission by EVERYONE, that we are at war with a liberty-nuking flavor of political Islam.
What We Expect to See: A myopic, increasingly weakened, Uncle Sam who seems determined to make war on We the People, by pinning a ‘terrorist’ label on Tea Party Patriots and returning warriors.
Outcome: As far as I can tell, Barry’s Regime thinks we’re having an unfortunate squabble with some inexplicably cranky individuals who really just need a hug. So far, The One has bowed to Islamikaze leaders, refused to call Jihadikazes terrorists, and endorsed the building of a Mecca Maniac Victory Shrine/Terror Temple on Ground Zero in NYC. We nailed the part about Tea Party participants being vilified as ‘terrorists’.
Item 10:
What We’d Like to See: A mud wrestling match between Sarah Palin and Megan McCain with a string bikini clad Michelle Malkin serving as referee.
What We Expect to See: Three new ‘faces’ on our 2011 ‘Hotties Who Hit Us With A Restraining Order’ calendar.
Outcome: No mud wrestling match. No restraining order. Fear not, we’re carrying this one over for 2011's list.
There you have it, PIGsters. We did much better on our ‘expect to see’ than we did on our ‘like to see’ list. So be it. We’ll run up a new list in a couple weeks, so stay tuned.
A Hambo Rant Twofer
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts [12/24/10]
Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell
Now that the lame duck lunatics voted to dump don’t ask, don’t tell like a bad habit, I’m forced to wonder what, if anything, it means. My initial impression is that the law of unintended consequences is working overtime, on this one.
The most obvious unintended consequence is one that’s well documented. Highly motivated, commendably patriotic, individuals with all ‘the right stuff’ to be outstanding warriors are being kicked out for a seemingly irrelevant (GLAAD BAAGism) reason, robbing us of their badly needed skills. I must ask myself if the highly touted ‘good’ - unit cohesion - outweighs the bad - losing some exceptional warriors. I can’t answer that one. That answer has to come from the warriors who will be impacted by this social engineering.
Now that DADT is being phased out, I’m forced to ask the same question. Will the good, welcoming everyone with the right stuff - the requisite skills - in our military, outweigh the bad - a whole new set of unintended consequences.
In the brave new world without DADT, the most likely unintended consequence will involve some GLAAD BAAG whipping out the ‘Homophobe’ card, whenever things don’t go his, her, hisher, or its way. Will a tidal wave of political correctness destroy our military? I fear that the answer is ‘yes’.
Number One On My Wish List
[This is only a couple months old, but it’s a perfect ‘Tis the Season’ item. Why? Because it explains the number one item on my wish list. Don’t waste my time telling me about your iPhone, your 4G connection and all that crap. I want a telecommunications device that’s equipped with those two essential functions: "Smack ‘em" and "Smoke ‘em".
I predict that this cutting edge technology would, singlehandedly pull America’s economy out of the crapper. Why? Everyone will want it.
Given all that, do you still wonder why I’m running this one past you, again? I didn’t think so.]
Today, I’m going to serve up an item which has lingered on my wish list for much too long. What is it? You’re going to be thrilled.
Wish List Item: A "Smack ‘em" function on my phone, because there are times when you want to reach through the phone and SMACK the asshat on the other end of the call.
A "smack ‘em" function? You bet. There’s a pressing need for this goodie, and I can prove it.
* After you squander precious minutes of your life working your way through the "press ‘1' for" automated answering maze, you finally blunder into a living, breathing, human being. You’re so punch drunk from the automated answering system ordeal, you aren’t as alert as you need to be, in this situation. With your guard down, you agree - DUMBASS - to be put on hold. By the time you blurt out that "D’OH", it’s too late, and you’re in elevator music hell. But, if you had a "smack ‘em" function, you could administer a bitch slap on your tormentor, with the simple press of a switch. If you’re on your toes, you’ll "smack ‘em" the minute they answer, moving you to the front of the line, for as long as you need to stay there.
* Your friend, relative, acquaintance, or sniveling sibling, starts blubbering, the instant you answer the phone. Been there? Heard it? Don’t want to go down that long, torturous road again? No problem, "smack ‘em".
* When that telemarketing twerp calls you during dinner, or at the critical moment in your favorite boob tube show, don’t put up with their bull crap, "smack ‘em".
* Is your ex fond of calling you up and spewing a venomous trip down memory lane? Why put up with it one moment longer? Why wait for him, her, himher, or it, to call you? Instead, phone the pest up and "smack ‘em".
* Did some humor challenged Harpy take out a restraining order on you that bans you from Hooters, until the sun burns out? Don’t sit there feeling sorry for yourself, call the bitch up and "smack ‘em".
* Is your hippie neighbor blowing out your ear drums with his god-awful music? Don’t waste your time calling the cops, when you can call that music lover and "smack ‘em"
* Are you going postal listening to that blithering fool that your favorite boom box talk show host has as a guest? Don’t grit your teeth, don’t switch the station, just get the rat bastard on the phone and "smack ‘em".
* When your so-called best friend calls long distance COLLECT to gloat, after his favorite team beat your favorite team, you no longer need to imagine the joy of having this exchange of views in person, where you could respond with some chin music. With this goodie, no matter how far apart you are, you can sooth the agony of defeat the instant that you "smack ‘em".
Once you give this some serious thought, you’ll realize how essential it is to add "smack ‘em" to your phone. Hell, a technological advance of this caliber could revitalize the American economy.
Since I have been thinking about it longer than any of you, I have come up with a couple necessary enhancements that will take "smack ‘em" to the next level. The first is a targeting mechanism that would allow you to pin a bull’s-eye on the bellowing cell idiot in the restaurant, or that road warrior cell idiot in front of you who is driving 40 mph SLOWER, than everyone else on the expressway. Without this enhancement, you’re SOL, because you don’t have their number. BUT, with a targeting mechanism, you could put the cell idiot in the crosshairs and "smack ‘em".
The second enhancement is a very special case which targets those telecommunications terrorists, robocallers. For them, a simple "smack ‘em" isn’t enough. Besides, you can’t be certain they’re anywhere near the implement of technological terror when you get the robocall. What to do? For this situation, I envision a fleet of Predator drones armed with hellfire missiles. For a nominal fee, you can buy ‘time’ on the drone fleet. With that done, you can sit back and wait for some robocall asshat to press his, her, hisher, or its luck by calling you. When that happens, you hit the "SMOKE ‘EM" switch which will initiate a call trace, then deploy the nearest predator to take out the robocalling facility.
"Smack ‘em" and "smoke ‘em" are my idea of ‘reaching out to touch someone’. I’m just sayin’.
Hambo’s Christmas Survival Guide
Source: Pagan Scribbler Shallow Thoughts [12/17/10]
Tis the season, PIGsters and it’s time for this table pounding pagan to chill out and share some essential, suitably festive, wisdom with you. Am I up to the challenge? I have a feeling we’ll find out the answer to that one together.
The best way to start out is to share some of Hambo’s Rules of Christmas Engagement:
1) When cut to the appropriate dimensions, fruitcake makes a dynamite hockey puck. In fact, you’ll soon discover that it’s vastly superior to the real thing.
2) It’s not the thought, it’s the gift that counts, but you’re required to smile anyway. You’re obligated to grit your teeth and thank the clueless cretin who gave you another god-awful tie that you wouldn’t wear on a bet.
3) Regifting is cool, but make damn sure you keep track of who gave you the damn thing in the first place. Return to sender is spiffy, when you’re dealing with errant mail, but nobody’s idea of a good time if you accidentally give the damn thing back to the one who gave it to you.
4) I know you’re going to pig out and so do you, so why torture yourself with all those guilt-induced delusions about the diet you’re going to start the first thing next year? If you need an excuse, tell, whomever, that you’re PIGing out to honor a certain infamous speed bump in cyberspace.
5) If the hostess fires one of those "try some of that, it’s a new recipe" shots across your bow, wait for someone else to try it first. It’s better to be a witness at their inquest than to be the guest of honor at yours.
6) While attending the office Christmas party, make sure you know the full name of the hottie you selected for that dirty dancing exhibition. One poor bastard made that mistake and learned the hard way - you’re so fired, bump and grind Sparky - that dirty dancing with the boss’s wife can be the fast track to the unemployment office.
7) Speaking of the office party, watch your mouth, if you know what’s good for you. Honesty might be the best policy in most situations, but a notable exception is the Office Christmas party. It’s not the time or place to ask your amply endowed co-worker if her sweater puppies are home grown or high tech. It’s not the time to tell those above you in the chain of command how far they’ve got their head up their ass even if - especially if - it’s too, too, true.
8) When it comes to gift giving, KISS is still the road to gift giving glory. Keeping it simple stupid means just saying no to any gift idea which will take more than 10 words to explain.
9) Don’t be intimidated by the Grinches. It’s Christmas time in this land of the not as free as we’re supposed to be. That means, hitting every Grinch you meet with that seasonally-correct ‘bite me’, AKA "Merry Christmas".
10) Last, but far from least, remember that these holiday gatherings are the ideal time and place to scout for your designated Obamunist scapegoat. You’re going to need at least one of those, when you need to vent over the Marxist Messiah’s latest frontal assault on your life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
Stay tuned to the Free State of PIG during this holiday season for more of Hambo’s compelling wisdom, and advice. You’re going to need all the help you can get to negotiate this Christmas Season minefield.
Christmas: A One-size-fits-all Holiday
Source: Pagan Scribbler Rant
[This rant originated as an e-mail response to a message from my friend, PIGster J. The essential fact you need about PIGster J. is that he is a devote Christian.
As a result of our divergent philosophies, PIGster J. and I have perpetrated many spirited - but invariably respectful - debates on a variety of theological subjects. In one instance, in addition to an exchange of views on atheist 'activism' , we veered off onto the subject of Christmas and its true meaning.
Here, to the best of my meager ability, are my views on this recurring hot-button issue.]
As far as I can tell, Christmas has evolved into a one-size-fits all holiday that has something for everybody. For PIGster J. and those who share his Christian philosophy, it is, essentially, a celebration of the birth of a savior. For Hambo, it is an excuse to decorate his top secret bunker with various items depicting that Jolly Old Elf of secular folklore. For capitalists, it's a time of year when, they hope, cash registers ring out the year with rousing profits. For Grinches, it's a time to throw brickbats at PIGster J., Hambo and the capitalists. Like I said, it has something for everybody.
Ideally, everybody should step back, and take several deep breaths. Ideally, we should each honor this one-size-fits all holiday in the manner that thrills us spitless and give other sovereign individuals the space to do the same. If my neighbor puts out his manger scene and honors the birth of a savior, that's his right. If another neighbor is working 16 hour days at his outpost of capitalism, raking in those profits, that's cool too. I won't paint a bull's-eye on their manger or cash register, but I would appreciate the same consideration about my veneration of a Jolly Old Elf.
If you put a gun to my head and demanded my opinion - as if anyone ever had to coerce an opinion from Hambo - I would opine that this one-size-fits-all approach to Christmas is utterly, classically, American. Nobody is coerced into accepting one manner of celebrating this holiday. Instead, each individual is allowed deal with it as he, she, heshe or it sees fit. For PIGster J., Jesus is the reason for the season. For Hambo, Christmas is a time of year when he, like many others, brighten up their neighborhood with twinkling multicolored strings of lights, a tree decorated with tinsel, lights and ornaments, plus depictions of Santa's jovial self. For capitalists, it's a time to reduce that inventory and fill their cash register by selling PIGster J. the decorative elements that flesh out his holiday, and selling more Santa stuff to Mrs. Hambo. These highly individual approaches to the same event are the essence of this great nation.
The upshot of all this is that, despite our different approaches to this one-size fits-all Christmas holiday...despite our various motives for celebrating it, we all end up with that same feeling of joy...that same smile on our face. To this pagan scribbler, the real Christmas miracle is the fact that, for diverse reasons, this one-size-fits-all holiday brings a lot of joy and happiness to everybody. Well, everybody but the Grinches and the less said about them, the better.
I congratulate PIGster J. on the birth of his savior with a heartfelt Merry Christmas. I congratulate the capitalists for their full to overflowing cash registers with an equally heartfelt Merry Christmas. All I ask in return is the same consideration for my Jolly Old Elf approach, but I won't get suicidal if you throw in a Merry Christmas.
To get things off on the right foot, here's a heartfelt Merry Christmas from Hambo for everybody, even those damn Grinches.
[PIGster J. is on board - within reason - with my notion of a one-size-fits-all Christmas, but he, quite rightly, points out that the 'right not to be offended' pinheads aren't willing to live and let live:
"Unfortunately, I’m seeing more and more indications (as I would guess you are, too) that the one size fits all holiday in which everyone is welcome to celebrate it how they wish is rapidly becoming a thing of the past, thanks to the “victims” out there who are forced to either see Santa (horrors!) and so they complain, or are forced to see those dastardly, subliminal Christmas lights and/or manger scenes, and so they complain. More’s the pity, says I."
More's the pity indeed. Damn Grinches!]
Why are America’s rugged individuals an endangered species?
Source: Top Story Archives
North America has a long, storied tradition, when it comes to trailblazers and those exceptional humans I call "rugged individuals". The "new world" was not user friendly in the least, but more than 10,000 years ago, in the waning days of an ice age, Siberian trailblazers gazed upon the land bridge across the Bering Straits and asked themselves "I wonder where that leads?". Refusing to shrug it off, these trailblazers started out on a dangerous journey into unknown territory to face its dangers head-on. Why did they risk it? Because it’s a primal human impulse to find out what’s around that next turn in the road, beyond that hill on the horizon, or across that dangerous stretch of ocean.
Millennia later, another influx of rugged, trailblazing individuals started out on their own dangerous journey in boats that were barely up to the challenge of a notoriously unforgiving stretch of ocean. They landed on the new world and began to populate its eastern shores with men and women who dared to dream of a bold, untried form of government. Shaped by the new continent they now inhabited, these liberty-seeking Americans stunned the world by beating the reigning world superpower- England - in a war that they weren’t supposed to win. Far from finished, they threw away the existing political playbook and dared to form a nation whose government was strictly, severely, explicitly, limited to those functions that maximized the liberty of each and every American citizen.
During the years that followed, this nation conceived in liberty continued to produce those trailblazing rugged individuals who, instinctively, carve out their own niche by forging their own, one-of-a-kind identity. They are easy to identify because they’re, invariably the kind of sovereign individual who can’t be tagged with a convenient, one-size-fits-all label, pigeonholed and quickly forgotten.
At the dawn of this nation conceived in liberty, Thomas Paine took up his pen and wrote inspirational words that bolstered the colonists’ fighting spirit during the darkest days of America’s revolutionary war. Later, he traveled to France and risked his life by defying its ruling elites. His unrelenting advocacy for inalienable individual liberty landed him in jail and nearly cost him his life. Just getting started, Paine took on the world’s most powerful lobby, the Christian Church, and fought it to a standstill with a book that’s still widely read "Age of Reason". That last battle alienated Paine from the American mainstream, but he never backed down, because "quit" is one word this rugged American individual didn’t have in his vocabulary.
Throughout America’s history, trailblazers - rugged individuals - emerged from the teeming masses, but, the sad fact is that, over the years, decades and centuries following our nation’s inception, America grew soft and produced fewer of these essential individuals as the years passed. For every Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, Mark Twain, Buddy Holly, George Patton or Ayn Rand there were thousands who sought the anonymous comfort that comes from being "another face in the crowd". I’d like to tell you that this trend is reversing itself, but I can’t.
"Back in the day" we would find an elected official like Teddy Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan or Barry Goldwater who was that ultra rare trailblazing rugged individual who defied the odds by winning an election. As much as I want to tell you that we still have some of these essential sovereign individuals around, I can't. In the 21st century, our liberty is being suffocated by a rising tide of dime-a-dozen Elected Tormentors who spout, with meaningless variations, the same liberty-zapping, Nanny State aggrandizing line.
America no longer produces the trailblazers we need and that’s more than a little troubling, because they are so essential to our nation’s survival. Today, America is teeming with pretenders who try to pose as trailblazers, but they lack that essential quality: the guts to face your critics in open battle, defeat them in the arena of ideas, then move ahead to face that next challenge. Instead, we have political punks like Jimmy Carter who writes an inflammatory book full of distortions, then refuses to accept a challenge to debate it in a public forum. We have a Malignant Narcissist named Barack Obama who has NEVER allowed his views, his qualifications, to be challenged in a open, no holds barred forum. All of The One’s public appearances are scripted, stage managed to a fault and completely controlled, especially those so-called interviews with fawning alleged journalists.
Now and then, one of those rare rugged individuals emerges where you least expect them. That’s certainly the case with author, lecturer and talk show host Tammy Bruce. After starting out as a card-carrying NO NAD, Tammy broke out of that suffocating mold and forged her own, unique identity. She doesn’t drink the pachyderm punk Kool-Aid and she won’t kowtow to the prevailing lefty loony tune agenda. Trailblazer Tammy’s views are utterly, uniquely Tammy.
A stark contrast to the News Nitwit horde, John Stossel is that rare exception, a rugged individual who refuses to censor himself to please his boob tube news bosses. John’s reports don’t contain a hint of Kool-Aid and they aren’t tainted by the merest trace of the approved lefty news spin. Trailblazer John is quite simply John, a man who defies conventional wisdom and refuses to accept a convenient label.
On a smaller, but no less important scale, Jon Basso, the man behind our favorite burger joint, The Heart Attack Grill, is one of those too damn rare, rugged American individuals. Defying the Fat Nazi horde and the Nanny State nitwits who aid and abet them, Jon blazed his own, restaurant industry trail at a time when most people - foolishly - believed all the great ideas had been road tested in the marketplace. Defying the Korrectniks, the Fat Nazis and the Nanny State clowns, Jon presses on with his plans to spread Heart Attack Grill franchises from sea to shining sea. He’s the classic trailblazing rugged American individual.
No list of modern trailblazers would be complete without mentioning a classic example of rugged individualism, Ted Nugent. Unlike the Libertard losers who play up to an adoring lefty media, Ted throws down the gauntlet with his enthusiasm for guns, hunting, individual liberty, and giving Korrectnik pinheads heartburn. There’s only one Ted and he is, we’re pleased to report, the embodiment of trailblazing rugged individualism.
Is there some magic way to repopulate America with this vanishing breed? Not really, but that doesn’t mean the situation is hopeless. You are the master of your own fate. Refuse to be pigeonholed. Dare to strike out on your own with some new, never been tried idea. Believe it or not, that’s how this speed bump in cyberspace got started. Two rugged individual wannabes decided to blaze a new trail with an your face, blatantly politically incorrect endeavor named PIG. We don’t claim to be Ted Nugent class trailblazing rugged individuals, but we’re working on it every damn day. If we can do it, why aren’t you? Don’t just sit there, start blazing your own trail.
|
| |
©
Copyright 1993-2012 PIG - The Politically Incorrect Gazette
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|