How Progtards protect their fatally flawed sacred cows from painful truths..
A no-fly zone is a territory or an area over which aircraft are not permitted to fly. Such zones are usually set up in a military context, somewhat like a demilitarized zone in the sky, and usually prohibit military aircraft of a belligerent power from operating in the region.
If your life is littered with Progtards, you know, too well, that they are the embodiment of the old saying: they can dish it out, but they can't take it. In fact, if you try to say anything, they'll silence you. For them, a 'dialogue' involves them ranting their moonbat gibberish while you listen to it. They don't want to hear the truth, about anything, because they can't handle it. If that truth thing got out in the public sphere, it might catch on, and we can't allow that.
Self-appointed masters of the public discourse, they do their best to keep dangerous notions like freedom of speech, limited government, inalienable individual liberty and individual accountability from 'the masses'. Of all the dangerous truths, the most dangerous of all is the truth about their cherished - and fatally flawed - icons. From noxious notions like Global Warming and Secondhand Smoke to Lefty luminaries like Shrillary and Barry, the one thing the Progtards won't allow is some hooligan shouting "the Emperor has no clothes".
What, if anything does this have to do with No Fly Zones? Good question.
This rant reached critical mass, when some Shrillary supporters - HRC Super Volunteers - began constructing what we'll call a Rhetorical No Fly Zone - over Bubba's bisexual bride. This Rhetorical No Fly Zone seeks to shield Shrillary from her own past, present and future antics. Borrowing a page from the Obamunist playbook, Shrilllary's Shriekers are using the kind of Rhetorical No Fly Zone tactics that keep The One from being responsible for his own actions. The One's minions use it with the utmost skill to keep those pesky POTUS chickens from coming home to roost in the Red Shed's fabled Oval Office.
The Rhetorical No Fly Zone - henceforth RNFZ - which shields Obama is depressingly simple, conceptually.
Anyone who dares to question The One's actions is racist.
If you disagree about 'rule by imperial decree', you're a racist.
If you disagree about any of his policies, you're racist.
If you question his work ethic as POTUS, you're a racist.
If you mention his Jihad against Israel, you're a racist.
If you cite the ways he violates the Constitution, you're a racist.
If you delineate all the actions he's taken on behalf of Islam inspired terrorism, you're a racist.
If you discuss how utterly unsuited, unqualified, he is for his POTUS position, you're a racist.
If you use his middle name, that's racism, too.
Anyone who points out The One's lies, damn lies, and his habit of contradicting himself are deemed racist.
Why are such things, and countless others racist? Because they get too real about The One who is our first black president.
During our sojourn in this particular circle of hell, the size of Obama's RNFZ has expanded geometrically until it encompasses everything. It can't be avoided and when the MSM piles it on, this RNFZ bullshit can be quite intimidating.
In Shrillary's instance, her Shriekers started modestly. Citing 'first female POTUS', Shrillary's Shriekers constructed a small, unimpressive RNFZ out of a dozen words that the MSM - all of us - are forbidden to use when describing Shrillary:
Polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, inevitable, entitled, over confident, secretive, "will do anything to win", "represents the past", "out of touch".
Curiously missing are "Benghazi", "Whitewater", "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy", "What difference does it make?", "personal e-mail server", plus comments about her tongue candy - Huma. I guess that makes these topics fair game.
There's nothing new about a political hack who does whatever it takes to distance himself, herself, hisherself or itself from responsibility for their own actions. That's as old as politics itself. Congenital assholes like UpChuck Schumer hit an opponent/critic with a pre-emptive out pouring of invective which borders on character assassination. For those not as gifted when it comes to vitriol, other methods are used, the most popular of which is the pay for play Spin Doctor. Among other things, a Spin Doctor makes an ideal scapegoat, when things get out of hand. If the 'scandal' won't go away unless someone falls on their sword, the Spin Doctor is made to order. I think it's part of their job description.
Senator Elizabeth 'Fauxcahontis' Warren is another lefty whom the Progtards have fitted with a No Fly Zone for her factually-flawed contention that she's part Siberian-American:
"No, as I said, these are my family stories. I have lived in a family that has talked about Native Americans, talked about tribes since I had been a little girl," she said. "I still have a picture on my mantel and it is a picture my mother had before that - a picture of my grandfather. And my Aunt Bea has walked by that picture at least a 1,000 times remarked that he - her father, my Papaw -- had high cheek bones like all of the Indians do. Because that is how she saw it and your mother got those same great cheek bones and I didn't. She that thought was the bad deal she had gotten in life." (CBS Affiliate)
For bringing that up, I'm - TA DA - a sexist. Shame on me. I suppose that mentioning how devoid she is of any meaningful leadership experience is sexist, too. There I go again.
Cowering in the deep shadows of Junk Science, are two prime examples of pay for play lab coated hooliganism. Each is shielded by its own RNFZ. The first is based on the gold standard of data manipulation and what amounts to scientific fraud. I refer to our old friend Secondhand smoke, which includes its bastard child, Thirdhand Smoke.
When it became clear that 'the public' was not suitably alarmed over the deleterious effects of firsthand smoke on smokers, the Smoke Nazis pulled a real stinker out of their butts. The name of this gem is secondhand smoke and it - allegedly - a BIGGER health risk than firsthand smoke. Why? Because, thanks to the numbers games played by Smoke Nazis, secondhand smoke is more deadly than firsthand smoke, PLUS, its primary victims are non-smokers who strayed too close to a smoker.
Secondhand smoke is still alive and well, as shown by the increasing popularity of smoking bans in public places. The problem, for Smoke Nazis, is that they haven't found a way to ban smoking in ALL private places. They made inroads in apartment buildings, and in some places, banned smoking in cars, when there's a child along for the ride. Despite that, there's no leverage available that might allow Smoke Nazis to stick their foot inside the door of a smoker's home sweet home. That's seems destined to change. How? You're going to be thrilled.
The new kid on the Smoke Nazi block is - TA DA - thirdhand smoke. That's right THIRDHAND SMOKE. What is it? According to the Smoke Nazis, it's the smoke 'contamination' which lingers long after a cancer stick is extinguished. It's the 'particulate matter' left over from tobacco smoke which sticks to clothes, hair, body parts, furniture, and everything else exposed to tobacco smoke. Big fun, but it gets better because, according to lab coated Smoke Nazi zealots, thirdhand smoke is a dire threat to - you gotta know what's coming - THE CHILDREN.
There's no nifty 'ism' for this one, so you'll need to take solace in 'shill for big tobacco' and/or 'capitalist exploiter'.
The second Junk Science stinker is, as if you can't guess, 'Global Warming'. The inconvenient truth that this RNFZ protects is this: the computer models on which this whopperthon is based have been proven, by REAL climate experts, to be fatally flawed. The dire predictions based on them, aren't even close to being real. Furthermore there's that 17 year long stretch, from the late 1990s to the present during which no warming was measured, according to satellite data.
In case you wondered denigrating Global Warming hysteria makes me denier and a sworn enemy of Mother Earth. I'm so ashamed.
The most rapidly expanding RNFZ belongs to Islam. In addition to shielding Islam's inherent violence and inability to peacefully coexist with anybody, it also safeguards a seemingly endless list of things that are forbidden by Islam for its adherents. The following list that I found in cyberspace is a good place to start.
Forbidden for women and men:
Talking too much
Praying behind a woman
Not removing hair from certain body parts at least every 40 days…or every Thursday or every Friday (depending on which hadiths make the most sense to you)
Talking to the "opposite" gender (except immediate family members), unless absolutely necessary
Being alone with the "opposite" gender (except immediate family members), unless absolutely necessary
Lusting after the "opposite" gender
Being homosexual (gay, lesbian)
Being neither woman nor man, being queer
Wearing the clothes of the "opposite" gender
Chatting/talking to/with the opposite gender on the Internet
Eating any non-zabeeha/halaal meat (including in the West)
Eating shrimp and most other sea foods
Listening to music
Indulging in any musical activities
Being Sunni (according to the non-Sunnis)
Being Shi' (according to the non-Shi's)
Being Ismaili (according to the non-Ismailis)
Being Ahmadi (according to the non-Ahmadis)
Being Wahhabi (according to the non-Wahhabis)
[… you get the point]
[… you get the point]
Putting a khaal (like the Afghans and some Middle Easterners do) on your forehead or anywhere on the face
Preferring your ethnicity to your religion (Islam)
Eating foods with gelatin
Eating with a spoon or fork (rather than with hands)
All forms of art
Taking photos, keeping photos in the home
Having a dog inside the home
Saying the word "khanzeer" (pig) [your prayers won't be accepted for 40 days afterwards]
Watching TV (unless it's some educational and Islamic program)
(And most probably your other favorite candies and chips – let's pray to God that ferrero rocher isn't among them, though)
Being vegan and/or vegetarian (especially if you're a woman! Since you might upset your husband and in-laws)
There's a lot more, but you get the idea. If these are banned for Islamists, then you're insulting Islam every time you violate one or more of them, especially if an Islamikaze is present. How can I live with myself, after bringing up, all that Islamophobic stuff?
"Future Citizens" - you'll know them as Disease-Ridden Border Jumping Scumbag Invaders - have a relatively new RNFZ. In theory their RNFZ banishes such topics as: the diseases they reintroduce into America, the crime they bring with them, their moocher status - free schooling, free healthcare, freebies from the Nanny State - plusthe squalor the perpetrate, to name a few.
In case you wondered, mentioning such things makes me - hangs head in shame - a Xenophobe and a racist.
Does your local lefty pain in ass have his, her, hisher or its RNFZ? Probably, but it won't be as impressive as the ones I cited. Don't take it too hard. He, she, heshe or it is just getting started. Speaking of getting started, when are you going to get working on yours? Enquiring minds want to know.